Lee Ching-Chi, Wang Jiun-Ling, Lee Chung-Hsun, Hsieh Chih-Chia, Hung Yuan-Pin, Hong Ming-Yuan, Tang Hung-Jen, Ko Wen-Chien
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Madou Sin-Lau Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jan 24;61(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02174-16. Print 2017 Feb.
Both fluoroquinolones (FQs) and third-generation cephalosporins (3rd-GCs) are commonly prescribed to treat bloodstream infections, but comparative efficacies between them were rarely studied. Demographics and clinical characteristics of 733 adults with polymicrobial or monomicrobial community-onset bacteremia empirically treated by an appropriate FQ (n = 87) or 3rd-GC (n = 646) were compared. A critical illness (respectively, 8.0% versus 19.0%; P = 0.01), an initial syndrome with severe sepsis (33.3% versus 50.3%; P = 0.003), or a fatal outcome at 28 days (4.6% versus 10.5%; P = 0.08) was less common in the FQ group. A total of 645 (88.0%) patients were febrile at initial presentation, and the FQ group with (FQ group versus 3rd-GC group, respectively, 7.6 days versus 12.0 days; P = 0.04) and without (3.8 days versus 5.4 days; P = 0.001) a critical illness had a shorter time to defervescence than the 3rd-GC group. By the propensity scores, 87 patients with appropriate FQ therapy were matched with 435 treated by 3rd-GC therapy at a ratio of 1:5, and there were no significant differences in terms of bacteremia severity, comorbidity severity, major comorbidities, causative microorganisms, and bacteremia sources between groups. Moreover, crude mortality rates at 28 days (FQ group versus 3rd-GC group, respectively, 4.6% versus 7.8%; P = 0.29) did not differ significantly. However, the time to defervescence was shorter in the FQ group (4.2 ± 3.6 versus 6.2 ± 7.6 days; P < 0.001). Conclusively in the adults with community-onset bacteremia, appropriate empirical FQ therapy was related to shorter time to defervescence than with 3rd-GC therapy, at least for those without a critical illness.
氟喹诺酮类药物(FQs)和第三代头孢菌素(3rd-GCs)都常用于治疗血流感染,但它们之间的相对疗效很少被研究。比较了733例接受适当氟喹诺酮类药物(n = 87)或第三代头孢菌素(n = 646)经验性治疗的多微生物或单微生物社区获得性菌血症成人的人口统计学和临床特征。在氟喹诺酮类药物组中,危重病(分别为8.0%对19.0%;P = 0.01)、初始综合征为严重脓毒症(33.3%对50.3%;P = 0.003)或28天内出现致命结局(4.6%对10.5%;P = 0.08)的情况较少见。共有645例(88.0%)患者在初次就诊时发热,有危重病的氟喹诺酮类药物组(氟喹诺酮类药物组对第三代头孢菌素组,分别为7.6天对12.0天;P = 0.04)和无危重病的氟喹诺酮类药物组(3.8天对5.4天;P = 0.001)退热时间均短于第三代头孢菌素组。根据倾向评分,87例接受适当氟喹诺酮类药物治疗的患者与以1:5比例接受第三代头孢菌素治疗的435例患者进行匹配,两组在菌血症严重程度、合并症严重程度、主要合并症、致病微生物和菌血症来源方面无显著差异。此外,28天的粗死亡率(氟喹诺酮类药物组对第三代头孢菌素组,分别为4.6%对7.8%;P = 0.29)无显著差异。然而,氟喹诺酮类药物组的退热时间较短(4.2±3.6天对6.2±7.6天;P < 0.001)。总之,在社区获得性菌血症成人中,适当的经验性氟喹诺酮类药物治疗与比第三代头孢菌素治疗更短的退热时间相关,至少对于那些无危重病的患者是这样。