Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Madou Sin-Lau Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Sep;50(3):371-376. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
The clinical benefits of an antimicrobial de-escalation strategy were compared with those of a no-switch strategy in bacteremic patients. Adults with community-onset monomicrobial Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species and Proteus mirabilis bacteremia treated empirically using broad-spectrum beta-lactams, including third-generation cephalosporins (GCs), fourth-GC or carbapenems, were treated definitively with first- or second-GCs (de-escalation group), the same regimens as empirical antibiotics (no-switch group), or antibiotics with a broader-spectrum than empirical antibiotics (escalation group). The eligible 454 adults were categorized as the de-escalation (231 patients, 50.9%), no-switch (177, 39.0%), and escalation (46, 10.1%) groups. Patients with de-escalation therapy were more often female, had less critical illness and fatal comorbidity, and had a higher survival rate than patients in the other two groups. After propensity score matching in the de-escalation and no-switch groups, critical illness at onset (Pitt bacteremia score ≥ 4; 16.5% vs. 12.7%; P = 0.34) or day 3 (2.5% vs. 2.5%; P = 1.00), fatal comorbidity (16.5% vs. 21.5%; P = 0.25), time to defervescence (4.6 vs. 4.7 days; P = 0.89), hospital stays (11.5 vs. 10.3 days; P = 0.13) and 4-week crude mortality rate (4.4% vs. 4.4%; P = 1.00) were similar. However, lower antibiotic cost (mean: 212.1 vs. 395.6 US$, P <0.001) and fewer complications of bloodstream infections due to resistant pathogens (0% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.004) were observed in the de-escalation group. De-escalation to narrower-spectrum cephalosporins is safe and cost-effective for adults with community-onset EKP bacteremia stabilized by empirical broad-spectrum beta-lactams.
本研究旨在比较抗菌药物降阶梯策略与不换药策略在菌血症患者中的临床疗效。经验性使用包括第三代头孢菌素(GCs)在内的广谱β-内酰胺类药物治疗社区获得性单一微生物大肠埃希菌、克雷伯菌属和奇异变形杆菌菌血症的成年患者,根据治疗方案分为降阶梯组(231 例,50.9%)、不换药组(177 例,39.0%)和升阶梯组(46 例,10.1%)。降阶梯组患者女性更多,合并危重症和致死性合并症更少,生存率更高。在降阶梯组和不换药组进行倾向评分匹配后,两组患者在起始时(Pitt 菌血症评分≥4 分;16.5% vs. 12.7%;P=0.34)或第 3 天(2.5% vs. 2.5%;P=1.00)的危重症发生率、致死性合并症(16.5% vs. 21.5%;P=0.25)、退热时间(4.6 天 vs. 4.7 天;P=0.89)、住院时间(11.5 天 vs. 10.3 天;P=0.13)和 4 周粗死亡率(4.4% vs. 4.4%;P=1.00)相似。然而,降阶梯组抗生素费用(平均:212.1 美元 vs. 395.6 美元,P<0.001)和因耐药病原体引起的血流感染并发症(0% vs. 5.1%,P=0.004)更少。对于经验性使用广谱β-内酰胺类药物稳定的社区获得性 EKP 菌血症成人患者,降阶梯至窄谱头孢菌素类药物是安全且具有成本效益的。