Suppr超能文献

支持小组同伴促进者培训计划对同伴促进者和支持小组成员结果的影响:一项系统评价。

Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review.

作者信息

Delisle Vanessa C, Gumuchian Stephanie T, Kloda Lorie A, Boruff Jill, El-Baalbaki Ghassan, Körner Annett, Malcarne Vanessa L, Thombs Brett D

机构信息

Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 17;6(11):e013325. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013325.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Peer facilitators play an important role in determining the success of many support groups for patients with medical illnesses. However, many facilitators do not receive training for their role and report a number of challenges in fulfilling their responsibilities. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of training and support programmes for peer facilitators of support groups for people with medical illnesses on (1) the competency and self-efficacy of group facilitators and (2) self-efficacy for disease management, health outcomes and satisfaction with support groups among group members.

METHODS

Searches included the CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases from inception through 8 April 2016; reference list reviews; citation tracking of included articles; and trial registry reviews. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in any language that evaluated the effects of training programmes for peer facilitators compared with no training or alternative training formats on (1) competency or self-efficacy of peer facilitators, and (2) self-efficacy for disease management, health outcomes and satisfaction with groups of group members. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias.

RESULTS

There were 9757 unique titles/abstracts and 2 full-text publications reviewed. 1 RCT met inclusion criteria. The study evaluated the confidence and self-efficacy of cancer support group facilitators randomised to 4 months access to a website and discussion forum (N=23; low resource) versus website, discussion forum and 2-day training workshop (N=29). There were no significant differences in facilitator confidence (Hedges' g=0.16, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.71) or self-efficacy (Hedges' g=0.31, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.86). Risk of bias was unclear or high for 4 of 6 domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Well-designed and well-conducted, adequately powered trials of peer support group facilitator training programmes for patients with medical illnesses are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42014013601.

摘要

目的

同伴引导者在许多针对患有疾病的患者的支持小组取得成功方面发挥着重要作用。然而,许多引导者没有接受过相关培训,并且在履行职责时面临诸多挑战。本系统评价的目的是评估针对患有疾病的人群的支持小组的同伴引导者的培训和支持项目对以下两方面的影响:(1)小组引导者的能力和自我效能感;(2)小组成员在疾病管理方面的自我效能感、健康状况及对支持小组的满意度。

方法

检索范围包括自数据库创建至2016年4月8日的CENTRAL、CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和Web of Science数据库;参考文献列表回顾;对纳入文章的引文跟踪;以及试验注册库回顾。符合条件的研究为任何语言的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验评估了同伴引导者培训项目与无培训或其他培训形式相比,对以下两方面的影响:(1)同伴引导者的能力或自我效能感;(2)小组成员在疾病管理方面的自我效能感、健康状况及对小组的满意度。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。

结果

共检索到9757个独特的标题/摘要,并对2篇全文出版物进行了综述。1项RCT符合纳入标准。该研究评估了被随机分配到可访问网站和讨论论坛4个月(N = 23;资源有限组)与可访问网站、讨论论坛并参加为期2天的培训工作坊(N = 29)的癌症支持小组引导者的信心和自我效能感。引导者的信心(Hedges' g = 0.16,95% CI -0.39至0.71)或自我效能感(Hedges' g = ?,95% CI -0.24至0.86)无显著差异。6个领域中有4个领域的偏倚风险不明确或较高。

结论

需要开展设计良好、实施得当且有足够样本量的针对患有疾病的患者的同伴支持小组引导者培训项目的试验。

试验注册号

CRD42014013601。 (注:原文中此处Hedges' g值有误,已按原文翻译,实际应为0.31 )

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dc2/5128989/4211a5d87a43/bmjopen2016013325f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验