Reaves Denise K, Hoadley Katherine A, Fagan-Solis Katerina D, Jima Dereje D, Bereman Michael, Thorpe Lynnelle, Hicks Jyla, McDonald David, Troester Melissa A, Perou Charles M, Fleming Jodie M
Department of Biology, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Mol Cancer Res. 2017 Feb;15(2):165-178. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0085-T. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
Lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR) has been found in the plasma membrane and is believed to function in lipoprotein endocytosis and tight junctions. Given the impact of cellular metabolism and junction signaling pathways on tumor phenotypes and patient outcome, it is important to understand how LSR cellular localization mediates its functions. We conducted localization studies, evaluated DNA binding, and examined the effects of nuclear LSR in cells, xenografts, and clinical specimens. We found LSR within the membrane, cytoplasm, and the nucleus of breast cancer cells representing multiple intrinsic subtypes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) showed direct binding of LSR to DNA, and sequence analysis identified putative functional motifs and post-translational modifications of the LSR protein. While neither overexpression of transcript variants, nor pharmacologic manipulation of post-translational modification significantly altered localization, inhibition of nuclear export enhanced nuclear localization, suggesting a mechanism for nuclear retention. Coimmunoprecipitation and proximal ligation assays indicated LSR-pericentrin interactions, presenting potential mechanisms for nuclear-localized LSR. The clinical significance of LSR was evaluated using data from over 1,100 primary breast tumors, which showed high LSR levels in basal-like tumors and tumors from African-Americans. In tumors histosections, nuclear localization was significantly associated with poor outcomes. Finally, in vivo xenograft studies revealed that basal-like breast cancer cells that overexpress LSR exhibited both membrane and nuclear localization, and developed tumors with 100% penetrance, while control cells lacking LSR developed no tumors. These results show that nuclear LSR alters gene expression and may promote aggressive cancer phenotypes.
LSR functions in the promotion of aggressive breast cancer phenotypes and poor patient outcome via differential subcellular localization to alter cell signaling, bioenergetics, and gene expression. Mol Cancer Res; 15(2); 165-78. ©2016 AACR.
脂肪分解刺激脂蛋白受体(LSR)已在质膜中被发现,并被认为在脂蛋白内吞作用和紧密连接中发挥作用。鉴于细胞代谢和连接信号通路对肿瘤表型和患者预后的影响,了解LSR细胞定位如何介导其功能很重要。我们进行了定位研究,评估了DNA结合,并研究了细胞核LSR在细胞、异种移植和临床标本中的作用。我们在代表多种内在亚型的乳腺癌细胞的膜、细胞质和细胞核中发现了LSR。染色质免疫沉淀(ChIP)显示LSR与DNA直接结合,序列分析确定了LSR蛋白的推定功能基序和翻译后修饰。虽然转录变体的过表达和翻译后修饰的药物处理均未显著改变定位,但抑制核输出增强了核定位,提示了一种核保留机制。免疫共沉淀和邻近连接分析表明LSR与中心体蛋白相互作用,为细胞核定位的LSR提供了潜在机制。使用来自1100多个原发性乳腺肿瘤的数据评估了LSR的临床意义,结果显示基底样肿瘤和非裔美国人肿瘤中的LSR水平较高。在肿瘤组织切片中,核定位与不良预后显著相关。最后,体内异种移植研究表明,过表达LSR的基底样乳腺癌细胞同时表现出膜定位和核定位,并以100%的发生率形成肿瘤,而缺乏LSR的对照细胞未形成肿瘤。这些结果表明,细胞核LSR改变基因表达,并可能促进侵袭性癌症表型。
LSR通过不同的亚细胞定位来改变细胞信号传导、生物能量学和基因表达,从而促进侵袭性乳腺癌表型和不良患者预后。分子癌症研究;15(2);165 - 78。©2016美国癌症研究协会。