CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 666303 Mengla, China.
Center of Plant Ecology, Core Botanical Gardens, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 666303 Mengla, China.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 10;118(32). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021148118.
Theory identifies factors that can undermine the evolutionary stability of mutualisms. However, theory's relevance to mutualism stability in nature is controversial. Detailed comparative studies of parasitic species that are embedded within otherwise mutualistic taxa (e.g., fig pollinator wasps) can identify factors that potentially promote or undermine mutualism stability. We describe results from behavioral, morphological, phylogenetic, and experimental studies of two functionally distinct, but closely related, wasp species associated with the monoecious host fig, , in Yunnan Province, China. One () is a competent pollinator exhibiting morphologies and behaviors consistent with observed seed production. The other ( sp.) lacks these traits, and dramatically reduces both female and male reproductive success of its host. Furthermore, observations and experiments indicate that individuals of this parasitic species exhibit greater relative fitness than the pollinators, in both indirect competition (individual wasps in separate fig inflorescences) and direct competition (wasps of both species within the same fig). Moreover, phylogenetic analyses suggest that these two species are sister taxa. By the strictest definition, the nonpollinating species represents a "cheater" that has descended from a beneficial pollinating mutualist. In sharp contrast to all 15 existing studies of actively pollinated figs and their wasps, the local exhibit no evidence for host sanctions that effectively reduce the relative fitness of wasps that do not pollinate. We suggest that the lack of sanctions in the local hosts promotes the loss of specialized morphologies and behaviors crucial for pollination and, thereby, the evolution of cheating.
理论确定了可能破坏互利共生进化稳定性的因素。然而,理论对自然界中互利共生稳定性的相关性仍存在争议。详细比较嵌入在其他互利共生类群中的寄生物种(例如榕果传粉蜂)的研究,可以确定潜在促进或破坏互利共生稳定性的因素。我们描述了在中国云南省,两种功能不同但密切相关的蜂种与雌雄同体的榕果宿主之间的行为、形态、系统发育和实验研究结果。一种()是一种有能力的传粉者,表现出与观察到的种子产量一致的形态和行为。另一种(sp.)则缺乏这些特征,极大地降低了其宿主的雌性和雄性生殖成功率。此外,观察和实验表明,与传粉者相比,这种寄生蜂种的个体具有更高的相对适合度,无论是在间接竞争(单独在榕果花序中的个体蜂)还是直接竞争(同一榕果中的两种蜂)中。此外,系统发育分析表明,这两个 物种是姐妹种。根据最严格的定义,非传粉物种代表了一个“骗子”,它是从有益的传粉互利共生体中进化而来的。与现有的 15 项关于主动传粉榕果及其传粉蜂的研究形成鲜明对比的是,当地的 种没有证据表明存在宿主制裁,这些制裁有效地降低了不进行传粉的蜂的相对适合度。我们认为,当地宿主缺乏制裁促进了对传粉至关重要的专门形态和行为的丧失,从而导致了欺骗的进化。