• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的再入院风险:雾化吸入β受体激动剂的比较研究

Readmission Risk in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: Comparative Study of Nebulized β-Agonists.

作者信息

Bollu Vamsi, Guérin Annie, Gauthier Geneviève, Hiscock Robert, Wu Eric Q

机构信息

Worldwide Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Analysis Group, Inc., 1000 De La Gauchetiere West, Suite 1200, Montreal, QC, H3B 4W5, Canada.

出版信息

Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2017 Mar;4(1):33-41. doi: 10.1007/s40801-016-0097-y.

DOI:10.1007/s40801-016-0097-y
PMID:27864792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5332308/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bronchodilators are used for managing the symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and minimizing the risk of hospitalization and readmission. Hospital readmission is predictive of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to compare all-cause readmission risk in COPD patients receiving nebulized long-acting β-agonists (neb-LABAs) versus nebulized short-acting β-agonists (neb-SABA) following COPD-related hospitalization discharge.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis utilized US-based pharmacy and medical claims records (2001-2011) to identify COPD patients aged ≥40 years receiving neb-LABA or neb-SABA treatment within 30 days following discharge from a COPD-related hospitalization. Patients had to be continuously enrolled in their health plan for ≥6 months before and after their first neb-LABA or neb-SABA prescription fill (index date), and adherent to the treatment for the first 3 months post-index date. To select patients with similar severity profiles, neb-LABA and neb-SABA patients were matched by baseline characteristics. Readmission risks were observed over the 6-month period following the index date and compared between neb-LABA and neb-SABA cohorts using the multiple variable Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The analysis included 246 matched patients (neb-LABA = 123; neb-SABA = 123). The mean age was 67 years, and 54% were female. The average length of stay during index hospitalization was 4.4 days. After adjusting for potential confounders, the risk of readmission was 47% lower in the neb-LABA cohort than in the neb-SABA cohort (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.96; P = 0.0349).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving neb-LABAs had a significantly lower readmission risk within 6 months following a COPD-related hospitalization versus patients treated with neb-SABAs.

摘要

背景

支气管扩张剂用于控制慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的症状,并将住院和再入院风险降至最低。医院再入院可预测发病率和死亡率。

目的

本研究的目的是比较慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)相关住院出院后接受雾化长效β受体激动剂(neb-LABA)与雾化短效β受体激动剂(neb-SABA)治疗的COPD患者的全因再入院风险。

方法

这项回顾性分析利用美国的药房和医疗理赔记录(2001年至2011年),确定年龄≥40岁、在与COPD相关的住院出院后30天内接受neb-LABA或neb-SABA治疗的COPD患者。患者在首次neb-LABA或neb-SABA处方配药(索引日期)前后必须连续参加其健康计划≥6个月,并在索引日期后前3个月坚持治疗。为了选择具有相似严重程度特征的患者,根据基线特征对neb-LABA和neb-SABA患者进行匹配。在索引日期后的6个月内观察再入院风险,并使用多变量Cox比例风险模型比较neb-LABA和neb-SABA队列之间的风险。

结果

分析纳入了246例匹配患者(neb-LABA组=123例;neb-SABA组=123例)。平均年龄为67岁,54%为女性。索引住院期间的平均住院时间为4.4天。在调整潜在混杂因素后,neb-LABA队列的再入院风险比neb-SABA队列低47%(风险比0.53,95%置信区间0.30-0.96;P=0.0349)。

结论

与接受neb-SABA治疗的患者相比,接受neb-LABA治疗的患者在COPD相关住院后6个月内的再入院风险显著降低。

相似文献

1
Readmission Risk in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: Comparative Study of Nebulized β-Agonists.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的再入院风险:雾化吸入β受体激动剂的比较研究
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2017 Mar;4(1):33-41. doi: 10.1007/s40801-016-0097-y.
2
Reduction in Hospital Readmission Rates Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Real-world Outcomes Study of Nebulized Bronchodilators.慢性阻塞性肺疾病 Medicare 受益人群的住院再入院率降低:雾化支气管扩张剂的真实世界结局研究。
Clin Ther. 2019 Nov;41(11):2283-2296. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
Hospital readmissions following initiation of nebulized arformoterol tartrate or nebulized short-acting beta-agonists among inpatients treated for COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院患者使用酒石酸阿福特罗或沙丁胺醇雾化吸入剂治疗后的住院再入院情况。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:631-9. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S52557. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
4
Risk of all-cause hospitalization in COPD patients initiating long-acting or short-acting beta agonist therapy.COPD 患者开始使用长效或短效β激动剂治疗后的全因住院风险。
J Med Econ. 2013 Aug;16(8):1082-8. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.815625. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
5
Exacerbations, health services utilization, and costs in commercially-insured COPD patients treated with nebulized long-acting β2-agonists.接受雾化长效β2受体激动剂治疗的商业保险慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的病情加重、医疗服务利用及费用情况
J Med Econ. 2016;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1079530. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
6
Inhaled corticosteroids are more effective in COPD patients when used with LABA than with SABA.吸入性糖皮质激素与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用时,对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效优于与短效β2受体激动剂联合使用时。
Respir Med. 2005 Sep;99(9):1115-24. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.02.018. Epub 2005 Mar 21.
7
Long-acting beta2-agonist in addition to tiotropium versus either tiotropium or long-acting beta2-agonist alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.长效β2受体激动剂联合噻托溴铵与单独使用噻托溴铵或长效β2受体激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 22;2015(10):CD008989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008989.pub3.
8
Treatment patterns for patients hospitalized with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院患者的治疗模式
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Mar 15;75(6):359-366. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160979.
9
Real-world effectiveness of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol as initial maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a retrospective cohort study.乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)初始维持治疗的真实世界疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Aug 1;14:1721-1737. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S204649. eCollection 2019.
10
Association of Cardiovascular Risk With Inhaled Long-Acting Bronchodilators in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nested Case-Control Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入长效支气管扩张剂与心血管风险的相关性:一项巢式病例对照研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Feb 1;178(2):229-238. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7720.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing Hospital Readmissions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: Current Treatments and Preventive Strategies.降低慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的再入院率:当前治疗方法和预防策略
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 9;61(1):97. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010097.
2
Predictors of Readmission, for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) - A Systematic Review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者再入院的预测因素——一项系统综述
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Nov 18;18:2581-2617. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S418295. eCollection 2023.
3
Methods to assess COPD medications adherence in healthcare databases: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative safety and effectiveness of long-acting inhaled agents for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.长效吸入剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 26;5(10):e009183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009183.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of three different combinations of inhalers for severe and very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital of South India.印度南部一家三级护理教学医院中,三种不同吸入器组合用于重度和极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的成本效益分析。
Perspect Clin Res. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):150-8. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.159940.
3
评估医疗数据库中 COPD 药物依从性的方法:系统评价。
Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Sep 27;32(169). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0103-2023. Print 2023 Sep 30.
4
Medication management patterns among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who initiate nebulized arformoterol treatment.医疗保险受益人群中慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用雾化阿福特罗治疗的药物管理模式。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 May 15;14:1019-1031. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S199251. eCollection 2019.
Comparative effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol combination and fluticasone/salmeterol combination among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients new to controller treatment: a US administrative claims database study.
布地奈德/福莫特罗联合用药与氟替卡松/沙美特罗联合用药在初治慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效比较:一项美国行政索赔数据库研究
Respir Res. 2015 Apr 23;16(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0210-x.
4
Health care system-level factors associated with performance on Medicare STAR adherence metrics in a large, integrated delivery system.在一个大型综合医疗服务体系中,与医疗保险星级评定依从性指标表现相关的医疗保健系统层面因素。
Med Care. 2015 Apr;53(4):332-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000328.
5
Mortality in the United States, 2013.美国2013年的死亡率。
NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Dec(178):1-8.
6
Adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy is underestimated using days supply values in electronic pharmacy claims data.利用电子药房报销数据中的供应天数值来评估骨质疏松症药物治疗的依从性被低估了。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):67-74. doi: 10.1002/pds.3718. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
7
Long-acting bronchodilator use after hospitalization for COPD: an observational study of health insurance claims data.慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院后长效支气管扩张剂的使用:基于医疗保险索赔数据的观察性研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 May 3;9:431-9. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S59322. eCollection 2014.
8
A predictive analytics approach to reducing 30-day avoidable readmissions among patients with heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, or COPD.一种用于减少心力衰竭、急性心肌梗死、肺炎或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者30天可避免再入院率的预测分析方法。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2015 Mar;18(1):19-34. doi: 10.1007/s10729-014-9278-y. Epub 2014 May 3.
9
Hospital readmissions following initiation of nebulized arformoterol tartrate or nebulized short-acting beta-agonists among inpatients treated for COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院患者使用酒石酸阿福特罗或沙丁胺醇雾化吸入剂治疗后的住院再入院情况。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:631-9. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S52557. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
10
The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors.《1990-2010 年美国健康状况:疾病、伤害及危险因素负担》
JAMA. 2013 Aug 14;310(6):591-608. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.13805.