Baumeister David, Sedgwick Ottilie, Howes Oliver, Peters Emmanuelle
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Department of Psychology, London, UK.
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Department of Psychology, London, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Feb;51:125-141. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
Recent decades have seen a surge of research interest in the phenomenon of healthy individuals who experience auditory verbal hallucinations, yet do not exhibit distress or need for care. The aims of the present systematic review are to provide a comprehensive overview of this research and examine how healthy voice-hearers may best be conceptualised in relation to the diagnostic versus 'quasi-' and 'fully-dimensional' continuum models of psychosis. A systematic literature search was conducted, resulting in a total of 398 article titles and abstracts that were scrutinised for appropriateness to the present objective. Seventy articles were identified for full-text analysis, of which 36 met criteria for inclusion. Subjective perceptual experience of voices, such as loudness or location (i.e., inside/outside head), is similar in clinical and non-clinical groups, although clinical voice-hearers have more frequent voices, more negative voice content, and an older age of onset. Groups differ significantly in beliefs about voices, control over voices, voice-related distress, and affective difficulties. Cognitive biases, reduced global functioning, and psychiatric symptoms such as delusions, appear more prevalent in healthy voice-hearers than in healthy controls, yet less than in clinical samples. Transition to mental health difficulties is increased in HVHs, yet only occurs in a minority and is predicted by previous mood problems and voice distress. Whilst healthy voice-hearers show similar brain activity during hallucinatory experiences to clinical voice-hearers, other neuroimaging measures, such as mismatch negativity, have been inconclusive. Risk factors such as familial and childhood trauma appear similar between clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers. Overall the results of the present systematic review support a continuum view rather than a diagnostic model, but cannot distinguish between 'quasi' and 'fully' dimensional models. Healthy voice-hearers may be a key resource in informing transdiagnostic approaches to research of auditory hallucinations.
近几十年来,对于那些经历幻听却未表现出痛苦或无需护理的健康个体这一现象,研究兴趣激增。本系统综述的目的是全面概述这一研究,并探讨相对于精神病的诊断性与“准”和“全维度”连续体模型而言,如何能最好地对健康的幻听者进行概念化。我们进行了系统的文献检索,共得到398篇文章标题和摘要,对其进行了是否符合当前目标的审查。确定了70篇文章进行全文分析,其中36篇符合纳入标准。临床组和非临床组在诸如声音响度或位置(即头内/头外)等声音的主观感知体验方面相似,不过临床幻听者的声音更频繁、声音内容更消极且发病年龄更大。两组在对声音的信念、对声音的控制、与声音相关的痛苦以及情感困难方面存在显著差异。认知偏差、整体功能下降以及妄想等精神症状在健康幻听者中似乎比健康对照组更普遍,但比临床样本中要少。健康幻听者向心理健康问题的转变有所增加,但仅发生在少数人身上,且可由先前的情绪问题和声音痛苦预测。虽然健康幻听者在幻觉体验期间的大脑活动与临床幻听者相似,但其他神经影像学指标,如失配负波,尚无定论。临床和非临床幻听者在家族和童年创伤等风险因素方面似乎相似。总体而言,本系统综述的结果支持连续体观点而非诊断模型,但无法区分“准”和“全”维度模型。健康幻听者可能是为幻听研究提供跨诊断方法的关键资源。