Moon Jeonggeun, Lee Chan Joo, Lee Sang Hak, Kang Seok Min, Choi Donghoon, Yoo Tae Hyun, Park Sungha
Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei Med J. 2017 Jan;58(1):75-81. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.1.75.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and an important risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease. We investigated the impact of DM on subclinical CV damage by comprehensive screening protocol in ESRD patients.
Echocardiography, coronary computed tomography angiogram, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and central blood pressure with pulse wave velocity (PWV) were performed in 91 ESRD patients from the Cardiovascular and Metabolic disease Etiology Research Center-HIgh risk cohort.
The DM group (n=38) had higher systolic blood pressure than the non-DM group (n=53), however, other clinical CV risk factors were not different between two groups. Central aortic systolic pressure (148.7±29.8 mm Hg vs. 133.7±27.0 mm Hg, p= 0.014), PWV (12.1±2.7 m/s vs. 9.4±2.1 m/s, p<0.001), and early mitral inflow to early mitral annulus velocity (16.7±6.4 vs. 13.7±5.9, p=0.026) were higher in the DM group. Although the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) was not different between the DM and the non-DM group (95% vs. 84.4%, p=0.471), the severity of CAD was higher in the DM group (p=0.01). In multivariate regression analysis, DM was an independent determinant for central systolic pressure (p=0.011), PWV (p<0.001) and the prevalence of CAD (p=0.046).
Diabetic ESRD patients have higher central systolic pressure and more advanced arteriosclerosis than the non-DM control group. These findings suggest that screening for subclinical CV damage may be helpful for diabetic ESRD patients.
糖尿病(DM)是终末期肾病(ESRD)最常见的病因,也是心血管(CV)疾病的重要危险因素。我们通过综合筛查方案研究了DM对ESRD患者亚临床CV损伤的影响。
对心血管与代谢疾病病因研究中心高危队列中的91例ESRD患者进行了超声心动图、冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影、24小时动态血压监测以及中心血压与脉搏波速度(PWV)检测。
DM组(n = 38)的收缩压高于非DM组(n = 53),然而,两组之间的其他临床CV危险因素并无差异。DM组的中心主动脉收缩压(148.7±29.8 mmHg对133.7±27.0 mmHg,p = 0.014)、PWV(12.1±2.7 m/s对9.4±2.1 m/s,p<0.001)以及二尖瓣早期流入速度与二尖瓣环早期速度之比(16.7±6.4对13.7±5.9,p = 0.026)更高。尽管DM组和非DM组之间冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患病率无差异(95%对84.4%,p = 0.471),但DM组CAD的严重程度更高(p = 0.01)。在多变量回归分析中,DM是中心收缩压(p = 0.011)、PWV(p<0.001)和CAD患病率(p = 0.046)的独立决定因素。
糖尿病ESRD患者的中心收缩压更高,动脉硬化比非DM对照组更严重。这些发现表明,筛查亚临床CV损伤可能对糖尿病ESRD患者有益。