Wade Michael G, Kazeck Makinzee
School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Feb;57:489-500. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
We critically review the research literature that seeks to focus on the possible cause of children diagnosed with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). In so doing we contrast the traditional information processing (IP) approach as a model to explain the causal factors that account for the motor deficits present in children with DCD, with a dynamical systems (DS) account which argues that coordination deficits in children with DCD is less to do with problems of poor internal models (a cornerstone of IP theory) and more with a degrading of perception-action coupling. We review and comment on the extant empirical data and conclusions of both approaches. We conclude that the data for an IP explanation is weak and a reconsideration of DCD is in order with respect to the underlying cause of this issue.
我们批判性地审视了旨在聚焦于被诊断为发育性协调障碍(DCD)儿童的可能病因的研究文献。在此过程中,我们将传统的信息加工(IP)方法作为一种模型进行对比,该模型用于解释导致DCD儿童出现运动缺陷的因果因素,而动态系统(DS)理论则认为,DCD儿童的协调缺陷与内部模型不佳(IP理论的基石)问题关系不大,更多地与感知 - 行动耦合的退化有关。我们对这两种方法的现有实证数据和结论进行了综述和评论。我们得出结论,支持IP解释的数据较为薄弱,因此有必要重新考虑DCD这一问题的潜在原因。