Mehrholz Jan, Thomas Simone, Burridge Jane H, Schmidt André, Scheffler Bettina, Schellin Ralph, Rückriem Stefan, Meißner Daniel, Mehrholz Katja, Sauter Wolfgang, Bodechtel Ulf, Elsner Bernhard
Wissenschaftliches Institut, Private Europäische Medizinische Akademie der Klinik Bavaria in Kreischa, An der Wolfsschlucht 1-2, Kreischa, 01731, Germany.
Department of Public Health, Medizinische Fakultät, Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany.
Trials. 2016 Nov 24;17(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1687-4.
Critical illness myopathy (CIM) and polyneuropathy (CIP) are a common complication of critical illness. Both cause intensive-care-unit-acquired (ICU-acquired) muscle weakness (ICUAW) which increases morbidity and delays rehabilitation and recovery of activities of daily living such as walking ability. Focused physical rehabilitation of people with ICUAW is, therefore, of great importance at both an individual and a societal level. A recent systematic Cochrane review found no randomised controlled trials (RCT), and thus no supporting evidence, for physical rehabilitation interventions for people with defined CIP and CIM to improve activities of daily living. Therefore, the aim of our study is to compare the effects of an additional physiotherapy programme with systematically augmented levels of mobilisation with additional in-bed cycling (as the parallel group) on walking and other activities of daily living.
METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a prospective, rater-masked RCT of people with ICUAW with a defined diagnosis of CIM and/or CIP in our post-acute hospital. We will randomly assign patients to one of two parallel groups in a 1:1 ratio and will use a concealed allocation. One intervention group will receive, in addition to standard ICU treatment, physiotherapy with systematically augmented levels of mobilisation (five times per week, over 2 weeks; 20 min each session; with a total of 10 additional sessions). The other intervention group will receive, in addition to standard ICU treatment, in-bed cycle sessions (same number, frequency and treatment time as the intervention group). Standard ICU treatment includes sitting balance exercise, stretching, positioning, and sit-to-stand training, and transfer training to get out of bed, strengthening exercise (in and out of bed), and stepping and assistive standing exercises. Primary efficacy endpoints will be walking ability (defined as a Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) level of ≥3) and the sum score of the Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) (range 0-22 points) assessed by a blinded tester immediately after 2 weeks of additional therapy. Secondary outcomes will include assessment of sit-to-stand recovery, overall limb strength (Medical Research Council, MRC) and grip strength, the Physical Function for the Intensive Care Unit Test-Scored (PFIT-S), the EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire and the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNL-Index) assessed by a blinded tester. We will measure primary and secondary outcomes with blinded assessors at baseline, immediately after 2 weeks of additional therapy, and at 3 weeks and 6 months and 12 months after the end of the additional therapy intervention. Based on our sample size calculation 108 patients will be recruited from our post-acute ICU in the next 3 to 4 years.
This will be the first RCT comparing the effects of two physical rehabilitation interventions for people with ICUAW due to defined CIP and/or CIM to improve walking and other activities of daily living. The results of this trial will provide robust evidence for physical rehabilitation of people with CIP and/or CIP who often require long-term care.
We registered the study on 6 April 2016 before enrolling the first patient in the trial at the German Clinical Trials Register ( www.germanctr.de ) with the identifier DRKS00010269 . This is the first version of the protocol (FITonICU study protocol).
危重病性肌病(CIM)和多发性神经病(CIP)是危重病常见的并发症。两者都会导致重症监护病房获得性(ICU获得性)肌无力(ICUAW),这会增加发病率,并延迟康复以及诸如行走能力等日常生活活动的恢复。因此,对患有ICUAW的患者进行有针对性的身体康复在个人和社会层面都非常重要。Cochrane最近的一项系统评价发现,没有针对已确诊CIP和CIM患者进行身体康复干预以改善日常生活活动的随机对照试验(RCT),因此也没有支持性证据。因此,我们研究的目的是比较额外的物理治疗计划与系统性增加活动水平并结合额外的床上骑行(作为平行组)对行走和其他日常生活活动的影响。
方法/设计:我们将在我们的急性后期医院对已确诊患有CIM和/或CIP的ICUAW患者进行一项前瞻性、评估者盲法的RCT。我们将以1:1的比例将患者随机分配到两个平行组之一,并采用隐蔽分配。一个干预组除了接受标准的ICU治疗外,还将接受系统性增加活动水平的物理治疗(每周5次,共2周;每次20分钟;总共额外进行10次治疗)。另一个干预组除了接受标准的ICU治疗外,还将接受床上骑行治疗(次数、频率和治疗时间与干预组相同)。标准的ICU治疗包括坐位平衡训练、伸展、体位摆放、从坐到站训练、下床转移训练、强化训练(床上和床下)以及踏步和辅助站立训练。主要疗效终点将是行走能力(定义为功能步行分类(FAC)水平≥3)以及由盲法测试者在额外治疗2周后立即评估的重症监护病房功能状态评分(FSS-ICU)的总分(范围0-22分)。次要结局将包括对从坐到站恢复情况、整体肢体力量(医学研究委员会,MRC)和握力、重症监护病房身体功能测试评分(PFIT-S)、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)问卷以及由盲法测试者评估的重新融入正常生活指数(RNL指数)的评估。我们将在基线、额外治疗2周后立即、额外治疗干预结束后的3周、6个月和12个月由盲法评估者测量主要和次要结局。根据我们的样本量计算,在接下来的3至4年中,我们将从急性后期ICU招募108名患者。
这将是第一项比较两种身体康复干预对因已确诊CIP和/或CIM导致ICUAW患者行走和其他日常生活活动影响的RCT。该试验的结果将为经常需要长期护理的CIP和/或CIP患者的身体康复提供有力证据。
我们于2016年4月6日在德国临床试验注册中心(www.germanctr.de)注册了该研究,标识符为DRKS0001