Wernhart Simon, Hedderich Jürgen, Wunderlich Svenja, Schauerte Kunigunde, Weihe Eberhard, Dellweg Dominic, Siemon Karsten
Department of Cardiology, Fachkrankenhaus Kloster Grafschaft, Annostrasse 1, 57392, Schmallenberg, Germany.
Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart- and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Sports Med Open. 2021 Feb 1;7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00299-6.
Intensive care unit-acquired weakness syndrome (ICUAWS) can be a consequence of long-term mechanical ventilation. Despite recommendations of early patient mobilisation, little is known about the feasibility, safety and benefit of interval training in early rehabilitation facilities (ERF) after long-term invasive ventilation.
We retrospectively analysed two established training protocols of bicycle ergometry in ERF patients after long-term (> 7 days) invasive ventilation (n = 46). Patients conducted moderate continuous (MCT, n = 24, mean age 70.3 ± 10.1 years) or high-intensity interval training (HIIT, n = 22, mean age 63.6 ± 12.6 years). The intensity of training was monitored with the BORG CR10 scale (intense phases ≥ 7/10 and moderate phases ≤ 4/10 points). The primary outcome was improvement (∆-values) of six-minute-walk-test (6 MWT), while the secondary outcomes were improvement of vital capacity (VC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV), maximal inspiratory pressure (PI) and functional capabilities (functional independence assessment measure, FIM/FAM and Barthel scores) after 3 weeks of training. No adverse events were observed. There was a trend towards a greater improvement of 6 MWT in HIIT than MCT (159.5 ± 64.9 m vs. 120.4 ± 60.4 m; p = .057), despite more days of invasive ventilation (39.6 ± 16.8 days vs. 26.8 ± 16.2 days; p = .009). VC (∆0.5l ± 0.6 vs. ∆0.5l ± 0.3; p = .462), FEV (∆0.2l ± 0.3 vs. ∆0.3l ± 0.2; p = .218) PI (∆0.8 ± 1.1 kPa vs. ∆0.7 ± 1.3pts; p = .918) and functional status (FIM/FAM: ∆29.0 ± 14.8pts vs. ∆30.9 ± 16.0pts; p = .707; Barthel: ∆28.9 ± 16.0 pts vs. ∆25.0 ± 10.5pts; p = .341) improved in HIIT and MCT.
We demonstrate the feasibility and safety of HIIT in the early rehabilitation of ICUAWS patients. Larger trials are necessary to find adequate dosage of HIIT in ICUAWS patients.
重症监护病房获得性肌无力综合征(ICUAWS)可能是长期机械通气的结果。尽管有早期患者活动的建议,但对于长期有创通气后早期康复机构(ERF)中进行间歇训练的可行性、安全性和益处知之甚少。
我们回顾性分析了长期(>7天)有创通气后ERF患者(n = 46)的两种既定的自行车测力计训练方案。患者进行中度持续训练(MCT,n = 24,平均年龄70.3±10.1岁)或高强度间歇训练(HIIT,n = 22,平均年龄63.6±12.6岁)。训练强度用BORG CR10量表监测(高强度阶段≥7/10分,中度阶段≤4/10分)。主要结局是六分钟步行试验(6MWT)的改善(差值),次要结局是训练3周后肺活量(VC)、第1秒用力呼气量(FEV)、最大吸气压力(PI)和功能能力(功能独立性评估指标,FIM/FAM和Barthel评分)的改善。未观察到不良事件。尽管有创通气天数更多(39.6±16.8天对26.8±16.2天;p = 0.009),但HIIT组6MWT的改善趋势大于MCT组(159.5±64.9米对120.4±60.4米;p = 0.057)。HIIT组和MCT组的VC(差值0.5升±0.6对差值0.5升±0.3;p = 0.462)、FEV(差值0.2升±0.3对差值0.3升±0.2;p = 0.218)、PI(差值0.8±1.1千帕对差值0.7±1.3分;p = 0.918)和功能状态(FIM/FAM:差值29.0±14.8分对差值30.9±16.0分;p = 0.707;Barthel:差值28.9±16.0分对差值25.0±10.5分;p = 0.341)均有改善。
我们证明了HIIT在ICUAWS患者早期康复中的可行性和安全性。需要进行更大规模的试验以确定ICUAWS患者中HIIT的合适剂量。