Suppr超能文献

运用行为改变理论和定性方法,识别一种失语症对话疗法中的改变机制。

Identifying mechanisms of change in a conversation therapy for aphasia using behaviour change theory and qualitative methods.

作者信息

Johnson Fiona M, Best Wendy, Beckley Firle Christina, Maxim Jane, Beeke Suzanne

机构信息

University College London, Division of Psychology & Language Sciences, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

出版信息

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 May;52(3):374-387. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12279. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conversation therapy for aphasia is a complex intervention comprising multiple components and targeting multiple outcomes. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidelines published in 2008 recommend that in addition to measuring the outcomes of complex interventions, evaluation should seek to clarify how such outcomes are produced, including identifying the hypothesized mechanisms of change.

AIMS

To identify mechanisms of change within a conversation therapy for people with aphasia and their partners. Using qualitative methods, the study draws on behaviour change theory to understand how and why participants make changes in conversation during and after therapy.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: Data were derived from 16 participants (eight people with aphasia; eight conversation partners) who were recruited to the Better Conversations with Aphasia research project and took part in an eight session conversation therapy programme. The dataset consists of in-therapy discussions and post-therapy interviews, which are analysed using Framework Analysis.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Seven mechanisms of conversational behaviour change are identified and linked to theory. These show how therapy can activate changes to speakers' skills and motivation for using specific behaviours, and to the conversational opportunities available for strategy use.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: These clinically relevant findings offer guidance about the processes involved in producing behavioural change via conversation therapy. A distinction is made between the process involved in motivating change and that involved in embedding change. Differences are also noted between the process engaged in reducing unhelpful behaviour and that supporting new uses of compensatory strategies. Findings are expected to have benefits for those seeking to replicate therapy's core processes both in clinical practice and in future research.

摘要

背景

失语症对话疗法是一种复杂的干预措施,包含多个组成部分并针对多种结果。2008年英国医学研究理事会(MRC)发布的指南建议,除了测量复杂干预措施的结果外,评估还应设法阐明这些结果是如何产生的,包括确定假设的变化机制。

目的

确定失语症患者及其对话伙伴在对话疗法中的变化机制。该研究采用定性方法,借鉴行为改变理论来理解参与者在治疗期间及之后对话中做出改变的方式和原因。

方法与过程

数据来自16名参与者(8名失语症患者;8名对话伙伴),他们被招募到“与失语症患者更好对话”研究项目中,并参加了为期八节的对话疗法课程。数据集包括治疗期间的讨论和治疗后的访谈,采用框架分析法进行分析。

结果与发现

确定了七种对话行为改变机制并与理论相联系。这些机制展示了治疗如何能够激活说话者使用特定行为的技能和动机,以及可供策略使用的对话机会。

结论与启示

这些与临床相关的发现为通过对话疗法产生行为改变所涉及的过程提供了指导。区分了激发改变的过程和巩固改变的过程。还指出了减少无益行为的过程与支持补偿策略新应用的过程之间的差异。预计这些发现将对那些试图在临床实践和未来研究中复制治疗核心过程的人有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8f1/5507167/b7ffd64706b7/JLCD-52-374-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验