Nelson Jamie Lindemann
Professor of philosophy at Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan. She is also a fellow of the Hastings Center and co-editor of IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics.
AMA J Ethics. 2016 Nov 1;18(11):1132-1138. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.11.msoc1-1611.
Feminism has fought the trivialization of women's experiences, championed women's security, and insisted on respect for women's choices. In so doing, feminism has developed important perspectives on the complicated connections between what gender means as it plays itself in people's lives, and the inequalities of power and authority that structure much of human experience. Here, I put a few of these perspectives into contact with an issue where the interactions of gender and power are squarely in play: medicine's role in assisting gender transitioning generally and, specifically, the enduring controversy between medicine and many transgender people about the pathologization of transgender and the role of clinicians as gatekeepers to gender-transition interventions.
女权主义一直在反对对女性经历的轻视,捍卫女性的安全,并坚持尊重女性的选择。通过这样做,女权主义对性别在人们生活中所呈现的意义与构建人类诸多经历的权力和权威不平等之间的复杂联系,形成了重要的观点。在此,我将其中一些观点与一个性别和权力相互作用显著的问题联系起来:医学在一般性别转变过程中的作用,特别是医学与许多跨性别者之间关于将跨性别视为病态以及临床医生作为性别转变干预把关人角色的持久争议。