Ryu Kyoungho, Choi Wonjun, Shim Jaegeum, Song Taejong
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jan;208:55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
A pulmonary recruitment maneuver (PRM) can effectively reduce post-laparoscopic shoulder pain (PLSP). However, a high-pressure PRM may cause pulmonary barotrauma. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a PRM using two different maximum inspiratory pressures (40 and 60cmHO) for reducing PLSP.
Patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy were randomly allocated to a control group (n=30), a 40 cmHO PRM group (n=30), and a 60 cmHO PRM group (n=30). In the control group, residual carbon dioxide was removed by passive exsufflation through the port site. In the two intervention groups, the PRM consisting of five manual pulmonary inflations was performed at the end of surgery with a maximum pressure of 40 cmHO or 60 cmHO, respectively. Shoulder pain and wound pain were recorded using a visual analogue scale at 24 and 48h postoperatively.
Wound pain scores at 24 and 48h post-surgery were not different between the three groups. The PLSP scores in the two intervention groups were significantly lower than that seen in the control group at 24 and 48h postoperatively (P=0.006 and P<0.001, respectively). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the PLSP scores between the two intervention groups.
A low-pressure PRM (40cmHO) is as effective as a high-pressure PRM (60cmHO) for removing residual gas from the peritoneal cavity. PRM using a maximal inspiratory pressure of 40cmHO is safe and efficacious for the reduction of PLSP.
肺复张手法(PRM)可有效减轻腹腔镜术后肩部疼痛(PLSP)。然而,高压力的PRM可能会导致肺气压伤。本研究旨在评估使用两种不同最大吸气压力(40和60cmH₂O)的PRM减轻PLSP的有效性和安全性。
接受妇科腹腔镜手术的患者被随机分为对照组(n = 30)、40cmH₂O PRM组(n = 30)和60cmH₂O PRM组(n = 30)。对照组通过端口部位被动排气来清除残留二氧化碳。在两个干预组中,分别在手术结束时以40cmH₂O或60cmH₂O的最大压力进行由五次手动肺充气组成的PRM。术后24和48小时使用视觉模拟量表记录肩部疼痛和伤口疼痛情况。
三组术后24和48小时的伤口疼痛评分无差异。两个干预组术后24和48小时的PLSP评分均显著低于对照组(分别为P = 0.006和P < 0.001)。然而,两个干预组之间的PLSP评分无统计学显著差异。
低压力PRM(40cmH₂O)在从腹腔清除残留气体方面与高压力PRM(60cmH₂O)一样有效。使用40cmH₂O最大吸气压力的PRM在减轻PLSP方面是安全有效的。