Tazoe Toshiki, Perez Monica A
University of Miami, Department of Neurological Surgery, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Bruce W. Carter Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL, 33125, USA.
J Physiol. 2017 Apr 15;595(8):2715-2730. doi: 10.1113/JP273679. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
The corticospinal tract contributes to the control of finger muscles during precision and power grip. We explored the neural mechanisms contributing to changes in corticospinal excitability during these gripping configurations. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by cortical, but not by subcortical, stimulation were more suppressed during power grip compared with precision grip and index finger abduction. Intracortical inhibition was more reduced during power grip compared with the other tasks. An acoustic startle cue, a stimulus that engages the reticular system, suppressed MEP size during power grip to a lesser extent than during the other tasks at a cortical level and this positively correlated with changes in intracortical inhibition. Our findings suggest that changes in corticospinal excitability during gross more than fine finger manipulations are largely cortical in origin and that the reticular system contributed, at least in part, to these effects.
It is well accepted that the corticospinal tract contributes to the control of finger muscles during precision and power grip in humans but the neural mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. Here, we examined motor evoked potentials elicited by cortical and subcortical stimulation of corticospinal axons (MEPs and CMEPs, respectively) and the activity in intracortical circuits (suppression of voluntary electromyography) and spinal motoneurons (F-waves) in an intrinsic hand muscle during index finger abduction, precision grip and power grip. We found that the size of MEPs, but not CMEPs, was more suppressed during power grip compared with precision grip and index finger abduction, suggesting a cortical origin for these effects. Notably, intracortical inhibition was more reduced during power grip compared with the other tasks. To further examine the origin of changes in intracortical inhibition we assessed the contribution of the reticular system, which projects to cortical neurons, and projects to spinal motoneurons controlling hand muscles. An acoustic startle cue, which engages the reticular system, suppressed MEP size during power grip to a lesser extent than during the other tasks and this positively correlated with changes in intracortical inhibition. A startle cue decreased intracortical inhibition, but not CMEPs, during power grip. F-waves remained unchanged across conditions. Our novel findings show that changes in corticospinal excitability present during power grip compared with fine finger manipulations are largely cortical in origin and suggest that the reticular system contributed, at least in part, to these effects.
皮质脊髓束在精确抓握和强力抓握过程中有助于控制手指肌肉。我们探究了在这些抓握方式下导致皮质脊髓兴奋性变化的神经机制。与精确抓握和食指外展相比,皮质刺激而非皮质下刺激诱发的运动诱发电位(MEP)在强力抓握时受到的抑制更强。与其他任务相比,强力抓握时皮质内抑制作用减弱得更明显。一种能激活网状系统的听觉惊吓提示,在皮质水平上,与其他任务相比,其在强力抓握时对MEP大小的抑制作用较小,且这与皮质内抑制的变化呈正相关。我们的研究结果表明,在粗略而非精细的手指操作过程中,皮质脊髓兴奋性的变化主要源于皮质,并且网状系统至少部分地促成了这些效应。
人们普遍认为,皮质脊髓束在人类精确抓握和强力抓握过程中有助于控制手指肌肉,但其中涉及的神经机制仍知之甚少。在此,我们检测了在食指外展、精确抓握和强力抓握过程中,皮质和皮质下刺激皮质脊髓轴突诱发的运动诱发电位(分别为MEP和CMEP)以及手固有肌中皮质内回路的活动(随意肌电图的抑制)和脊髓运动神经元(F波)。我们发现,与精确抓握和食指外展相比,强力抓握时MEP的大小受到的抑制更强,而CMEP则不然,这表明这些效应源于皮质。值得注意的是,与其他任务相比,强力抓握时皮质内抑制作用减弱得更明显。为了进一步探究皮质内抑制变化的起源,我们评估了投射到皮质神经元以及投射到控制手部肌肉的脊髓运动神经元的网状系统的作用。一种能激活网状系统的听觉惊吓提示,与其他任务相比,其在强力抓握时对MEP大小的抑制作用较小,且这与皮质内抑制的变化呈正相关。在强力抓握时,惊吓提示会降低皮质内抑制,但不会降低CMEP。不同条件下F波保持不变。我们的新发现表明,与精细手指操作相比,强力抓握时出现的皮质脊髓兴奋性变化主要源于皮质,并表明网状系统至少部分地促成了这些效应。