Roberson Kirk B, Chowdhari Sean S, White Morgan J, Signorile Joseph F
1Laboratory of Neuromuscular Research and Active Aging, Department of Kinesiology and Sport Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida; and 2Miller School of Medicine, Center on Aging, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Oct;31(10):2765-2776. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001731.
Power training has become a common exercise intervention for improving muscle strength, power, and physical function while reducing injury risk. Few studies, however, have evaluated acute load changes on power output during traditional resistance training protocols. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify the effects of different loading patterns on power output during a single session of circuit resistance training (CRT). Nine male (age = 19.4 ± 0.9 years) and 11 female participants (age = 20.6 ± 1.6 years) completed 3 CRT protocols during separate testing sessions using 7 pneumatic exercises. Protocols included heavy load explosive contraction (HLEC: 80% one repetition maximum [1RM], maximum speed concentric-2 seconds eccentric), heavy load controlled contraction (HLCC: 80% 1RM, 2 seconds concentric-2 seconds eccentric), and moderate load explosive contraction (MLEC: 50% 1RM, maximum speed concentric-2 seconds eccentric). Protocols were assigned randomly using a counterbalanced design. Power for each repetition and set were determined using computerized software interfaced with each machine. Blood lactate was measured at rest and immediately postexercise. For male and female participants, average power was significantly greater during all exercises for HLEC and MLEC than HLCC. Average power was greatest during the HLEC for leg press (LP), hip adduction (ADD), and hip abduction (ABD) (p ≤ 0.05), whereas male participants alone produced their greatest power during HLEC for leg curl (LC) (p < 0.001). For male and female participants, significantly greater power was detected by set for LP, lat pull-down (LAT), ADD, LC, and ABD for the MLEC protocol (p < 0.02) and for LP, LAT, CP, and LC for the HLEC protocol (p < 0.03). A condition × sex interaction was seen for blood lactate changes ((Equation is included in full-text article.)= 0.249; p = 0.024), with female participants producing a significantly greater change for MLEC than HLEC (Mdiff = 1.61 ± 0.35 mmol·L; p = 0.011), whereas male participants showed no significant differences among conditions. Performing a CRT protocol using explosive training patterns, especially at high loads for lower-body exercises and moderate loads for upper-body exercises, produces significantly higher power than controlled speed training in most exercises. These results provide exercisers, personal trainers, and strength coaches with information that can assist in the design of training protocols to maximize power output during CRT.
力量训练已成为一种常见的运动干预方式,用于增强肌肉力量、爆发力和身体功能,同时降低受伤风险。然而,很少有研究评估传统阻力训练方案中急性负荷变化对功率输出的影响。因此,本研究的目的是量化在单次循环阻力训练(CRT)中不同负荷模式对功率输出的影响。9名男性(年龄 = 19.4 ± 0.9岁)和11名女性参与者(年龄 = 20.6 ± 1.6岁)在单独的测试环节中使用7种气动练习完成了3种CRT方案。方案包括重负荷爆发性收缩(HLEC:80%的一次重复最大值[1RM],最大速度向心收缩 - 2秒离心收缩)、重负荷控制性收缩(HLCC:80%的1RM,2秒向心收缩 - 2秒离心收缩)和中等负荷爆发性收缩(MLEC:50%的1RM,最大速度向心收缩 - 2秒离心收缩)。方案采用平衡设计随机分配。每次重复和每组的功率通过与每台机器连接的计算机软件确定。在休息时和运动后立即测量血乳酸。对于男性和女性参与者,在所有练习中,HLEC和MLEC的平均功率显著高于HLCC。在腿举(LP)、髋关节内收(ADD)和髋关节外展(ABD)的HLEC过程中平均功率最大(p≤0.05),而仅男性参与者在腿弯举(LC)的HLEC过程中产生最大功率(p < 0.001)。对于男性和女性参与者,在MLEC方案中,LP、引体向上(LAT)、ADD、LC和ABD的每组功率显著更高(p < 0.02),在HLEC方案中,LP、LAT、CP和LC的每组功率显著更高(p < 0.03)。血乳酸变化存在条件×性别交互作用((全文包含公式)= 0.249;p = 0.024),女性参与者在MLEC中的变化显著大于HLEC(Mdiff = 1.61 ± 0.35 mmol·L;p = 0.011),而男性参与者在各条件之间无显著差异。采用爆发性训练模式进行CRT方案,特别是在下半身练习中采用高负荷、上半身练习中采用中等负荷,在大多数练习中产生的功率显著高于控制性速度训练。这些结果为锻炼者、私人教练和力量教练提供了信息,可协助设计训练方案,以在CRT期间最大化功率输出。