• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠在年轻及老年患者中的比较]

[Comparison of propofol and thiopentone in young and elderly patients].

作者信息

Nielsen P A, Ahlburg P, Schnedler H O, Christensen J H

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1989 Aug 28;151(35):2204-6.

PMID:2789447
Abstract

Forty patients between 20 and 40 years and 39 patients between 60 and 80 years, all unpremedicated, were allocated to induction with propofol or thiopentone. The induction dose of propofol in patients between 60 and 80 years was 65% of the dose in the patients between 20 and 40 years. Administration of the induction dose of propofol was followed by an even decrease in mean arterial blood pressure of approximately 16% in young and in elderly patients. Propofol caused a more pronounced decrease in mean arterial blood pressure than thiopentone, both in young and elderly patients.

摘要

40名年龄在20至40岁之间且未进行术前用药的患者以及39名年龄在60至80岁之间且未进行术前用药的患者被分配接受丙泊酚或硫喷妥钠诱导麻醉。60至80岁患者的丙泊酚诱导剂量为20至40岁患者剂量的65%。给予丙泊酚诱导剂量后,年轻患者和老年患者的平均动脉血压均均匀下降约16%。在年轻患者和老年患者中,丙泊酚引起的平均动脉血压下降比硫喷妥钠更明显。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of propofol and thiopentone in young and elderly patients].[丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠在年轻及老年患者中的比较]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1989 Aug 28;151(35):2204-6.
2
Intra-ocular pressure changes during induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. A comparison of thiopentone and propofol followed by vecuronium.
Anaesthesia. 1988 Mar;43 Suppl:54-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09071.x.
3
Relative potency of propofol and thiopentone.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠的相对效价
Anaesthesia. 1987 Sep;42(9):1025. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb05402.x.
4
Influence of equipotent doses propofol and thiopentone on arterial pressure and heart rate at induction of anesthesia. A comparison between young and old patients.
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1989;40(3):167-74.
5
Induction characteristics of propofol in children: comparison with thiopentone.丙泊酚在儿童中的诱导特性:与硫喷妥钠的比较。
Anaesthesia. 1988 Jul;43(7):593-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb06699.x.
6
Propofol for induction of anaesthesia in children. A comparison with thiopentone and halothane inhalational induction.
Anaesthesia. 1988 May;43(5):350-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09010.x.
7
Comparison of propofol and thiopentone anaesthesia (with special reference to recovery characteristics).丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠麻醉的比较(特别提及苏醒特征)
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1987 Nov;15(4):389-93. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8701500406.
8
The relative potencies of thiopentone and propofol.硫喷妥钠和丙泊酚的相对效价。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1986 Jan;3(1):11-7.
9
Induction of anesthesia with propofol in urological outpatient surgery.泌尿外科门诊手术中丙泊酚诱导麻醉
Urol Int. 1989;44(1):41-2. doi: 10.1159/000281449.
10
A comparison of propofol and thiopentone as induction agents in outpatient surgery.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠作为门诊手术诱导剂的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 1987 Mar;34(2):110-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03015326.