Suppr超能文献

基于证据的健康促进项目实施与可持续性的基本资源:一项混合方法多地点案例研究

Essential Resources for Implementation and Sustainability of Evidence-Based Health Promotion Programs: A Mixed Methods Multi-Site Case Study.

作者信息

Dattalo M, Wise M, Ford Ii J H, Abramson B, Mahoney J

机构信息

Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, 2500 Overlook Terrace, 11G, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2017 Apr;42(2):358-368. doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0263-x.

Abstract

As of October 2016, use of federal Older Americans Act funds for health promotion and disease prevention will be restricted to the Administration on Aging's criteria for high-level evidence-based health promotion programs. Dissemination of these programs to rural communities remains limited. Therefore a strong need exists to identify strategies that facilitate program implementation and sustainability. The objective of this study was to compare organizational readiness and implementation strategies used by rural communities that achieved varying levels of success in sustaining evidence-based health promotion programs for older adults. We utilized a qualitative multi-site case study design to analyze the longitudinal experiences of eight rural sites working to implement evidence-based health promotion program over 3 years (8/2012-7/2015). Multiple sources of data (interviews, documents, reports, surveys) from each site informed the analysis. We used conventional content analysis to conduct a cross-case comparison to identify common features of rural counties that successfully implemented and sustained their target evidence-based health promotion program. Readiness to implement evidence-based programs as low at baseline as all site leaders described needing to secure additional resources for program implementation. Sites that successfully utilized six essential resources implemented and sustained greater numbers of workshops: (1) External Partnerships, (2) Agency Leadership Commitment, (3) Ongoing Source of Workshop Leaders, (4) Health Promotion Coordination Tasks Assigned to Specific Staff, (5) Organizational Stability, and (6) Change Team Engagement. The six essential resources described in this study can help rural communities assess their readiness to implement health promotion programs and work secure the resources necessary for successful implementation.

摘要

截至2016年10月,美国老年人法案联邦资金用于健康促进和疾病预防将限于老年事务管理局针对高水平循证健康促进项目的标准。这些项目在农村社区的传播仍然有限。因此,迫切需要确定有助于项目实施和可持续性的策略。本研究的目的是比较在维持老年人循证健康促进项目方面取得不同成功水平的农村社区所使用的组织准备情况和实施策略。我们采用定性多地点案例研究设计,分析了八个农村地点在3年(2012年8月至2015年7月)期间实施循证健康促进项目的纵向经验。来自每个地点的多种数据来源(访谈、文件、报告、调查)为分析提供了信息。我们使用传统内容分析法进行跨案例比较,以确定成功实施并维持其目标循证健康促进项目的农村县的共同特征。由于所有地点负责人都表示需要为项目实施获取额外资源,因此在基线时实施循证项目的准备情况较低。成功利用六种基本资源的地点实施并维持了更多的工作坊:(1)外部伙伴关系;(2)机构领导承诺;(3)工作坊领导者的持续来源;(4)分配给特定工作人员的健康促进协调任务;(5)组织稳定性;(6)变革团队参与度。本研究中描述的六种基本资源可以帮助农村社区评估其实施健康促进项目的准备情况,并努力获取成功实施所需的资源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验