• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将健康老龄化推广至大规模:一项质量改进干预措施的随机试验,旨在提高社区合作伙伴对循证健康促进项目的采用率。

Bringing Healthy Aging to Scale: A Randomized Trial of a Quality Improvement Intervention to Increase Adoption of Evidence-Based Health Promotion Programs by Community Partners.

作者信息

Ford James H, Abramson Betsy, Wise Meg, Dattalo Melissa, Mahoney Jane E

机构信息

Center for Health Systems Research and Analysis, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin (Dr Ford); Wisconsin Institute for Healthy Aging, Madison, Wisconsin (Drs Abramson and Mahoney); Sonderegger Research Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin (Dr Wise); Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Advanced Fellowship in Women's Health, William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin (Dr Dattalo); and Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin (Dr Mahoney).

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Sep/Oct;23(5):e17-e24. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000503.

DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000000503
PMID:27997482
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement intervention to increase delivery of 2 evidence-based health promotion workshops, Stepping On and Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP), in rural communities.

DESIGN

A cluster-randomized wait-list control group design.

SETTING

Rural Wisconsin counties with trained workshop leaders but no workshops in the prior year were eligible to participate.

INTERVENTION

Sixteen counties were randomized to receive the NIATx intervention or wait-list control. The 1-year intervention consisted of training and coaching county aging unit staff to apply NIATx methods to increase and sustain the number of Stepping On or CDSMP workshops in their community.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Mann-Whitney tests examined effect on workshops held, participants, and workshop completers. The paired Wilcoxon signed rank test explored change in participants' health behaviors and health care utilization.

RESULTS

Counties receiving the NIATx intervention significantly increased the number of workshops per county per year as compared with baseline (1.5 vs 0.19, P < .001) and sustained improvements during the year following the intervention. Stepping On participants, during the 6 months postintervention, had reduced falls risk behaviors (P < .001), 0.43 fewer falls (P < .01), and 0.028 fewer medical record-verified emergency department visits for falls-related injuries (P < .05) compared with the 6 months before the intervention. CDSMP participants had reduced social isolation (P = .018) and improved physician communication skills (P = .005).

IMPLICATIONS

Our study demonstrates that coaching rural service organizations in use of the quality improvement process, NIATx, may increase implementation reach of evidence-based health promotion/disease prevention programs. Initiative findings indicate that this approach may be a new and potentially important strategy to increase reach of health promotion programs for older adults in community settings.

CONCLUSION

A quality improvement approach effectively increases and sustains delivery of evidence-based health promotion/workshops for older adults in rural communities. Counties or states struggling to engage older adults in evidence-based health promotion workshops could integrate quality improvement into policies and practices to increase workshop availability. Once engaged, older adults experience improved health behaviors from both programs and reduced falls and emergency department utilization from Stepping On.

摘要

目的

评估一项质量改进干预措施在农村社区提高两个循证健康促进工作坊(“步步稳”和慢性病自我管理项目,即CDSMP)举办率的有效性。

设计

整群随机等待列表对照组设计。

地点

威斯康星州的农村县,这些县有经过培训的工作坊负责人,但上一年未举办工作坊,符合参与条件。

干预措施

16个县被随机分为接受NIATx干预组或等待列表对照组。为期1年的干预包括培训和指导县老龄单位工作人员应用NIATx方法,以增加并维持其社区内“步步稳”或CDSMP工作坊的数量。

主要结局指标

采用曼-惠特尼检验来考察对举办的工作坊、参与者及工作坊完成者的影响。采用配对威尔科克森符号秩检验来探究参与者健康行为和医疗保健利用情况的变化。

结果

与基线相比,接受NIATx干预的县每年每个县的工作坊数量显著增加(1.5个对0.19个,P <.001),且在干预后的一年中持续保持改善。与干预前6个月相比,“步步稳”项目的参与者在干预后6个月内,跌倒风险行为减少(P <.001),跌倒次数减少0.43次(P <.01),因跌倒相关损伤经病历核实的急诊科就诊次数减少0.028次(P <.05)。CDSMP项目的参与者社交孤立感减轻(P = .018),与医生沟通的技能得到改善(P = .005)。

启示

我们的研究表明,指导农村服务组织运用质量改进流程NIATx,可能会提高循证健康促进/疾病预防项目的实施范围。初步研究结果表明,这种方法可能是在社区环境中扩大针对老年人的健康促进项目覆盖范围的一种新的且可能重要的策略。

结论

一种质量改进方法能有效增加并维持农村社区为老年人提供的循证健康促进工作坊。难以让老年人参与循证健康促进工作坊的县或州,可以将质量改进纳入政策和实践中,以增加工作坊的可及性。一旦参与其中,老年人会从这两个项目中获得健康行为的改善,并且“步步稳”项目能减少跌倒和急诊科就诊次数。

相似文献

1
Bringing Healthy Aging to Scale: A Randomized Trial of a Quality Improvement Intervention to Increase Adoption of Evidence-Based Health Promotion Programs by Community Partners.将健康老龄化推广至大规模:一项质量改进干预措施的随机试验,旨在提高社区合作伙伴对循证健康促进项目的采用率。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Sep/Oct;23(5):e17-e24. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000503.
2
Surveillance for certain health behaviors among states and selected local areas--behavioral risk factor surveillance system, United States, 2004.美国2004年各州及部分地方地区特定健康行为监测——行为危险因素监测系统
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006 Jul 14;55(7):1-124.
3
Essential Resources for Implementation and Sustainability of Evidence-Based Health Promotion Programs: A Mixed Methods Multi-Site Case Study.基于证据的健康促进项目实施与可持续性的基本资源:一项混合方法多地点案例研究
J Community Health. 2017 Apr;42(2):358-368. doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0263-x.
4
Racial and ethnic minority participants in chronic disease self-management programs: findings from the Communities Putting Prevention to Work initiative.慢性病自我管理项目中的少数族裔参与者:社区预防工作倡议的研究结果。
Ethn Dis. 2013 Autumn;23(4):508-17.
5
Mental health and aging initiative: intervention component effects.心理健康与老龄化倡议:干预组成部分的效果
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:2154. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
6
Chronic disease self-management program in the workplace: opportunities for health improvement.职场中的慢性疾病自我管理项目:改善健康的机会。
Front Public Health. 2015 Apr 27;2:179. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00179. eCollection 2014.
7
Development and Implementation of the Health Literacy Program in Rural Counties.农村县健康素养项目的开发与实施
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Sep 6;3(3):e205-e215. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190731-01. eCollection 2019 Jul.
8
Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices.澳大利亚政府全科医疗即时检验试验中设备操作员培训项目的评估:农村及偏远医疗实践的问题与影响
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Jul-Sep;9(3):1189. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
9
After the Randomized Trial: Implementation of Community-Based Continence Promotion in the Real World.随机试验后:在现实世界中实施基于社区的控尿促进。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Nov;68(11):2668-2674. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16771. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
10
Dissemination of Chronic Disease Self-Management Education (CDSME) Programs in the United States: Intervention Delivery by Rurality.美国慢性病自我管理教育(CDSME)项目的推广:按农村地区划分的干预措施实施情况
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 14;14(6):638. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060638.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of implementation strategies for uptake of fall prevention interventions in community care: A systematic review.社区护理中预防跌倒干预措施采用的实施策略有效性:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 10;20(7):e0322727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322727. eCollection 2025.
2
Integrated solutions for sustainable fall prevention in primary care: a pragmatic hybrid-type 2 mixed methods implementation and effectiveness study.基层医疗中可持续预防跌倒的综合解决方案:一项务实的混合型2混合方法实施与效果研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;12:1446525. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1446525. eCollection 2024.
3
Barriers and facilitators for implementation of a combined lifestyle intervention in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review.
社区居住的老年人群中实施联合生活方式干预的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 11;11:1253267. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1253267. eCollection 2023.
4
Fall-related health service use in Stepping On programme participants and matched controls: a non-randomised observational trial within the 45 and Up Study.参与“踩步”计划的老年人与对照组老年人跌倒相关的卫生服务使用情况:45 岁以上研究中的一项非随机观察性试验。
Age Ageing. 2022 Dec 5;51(12). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac272.
5
Age-friendly interventions in rural and remote areas: A scoping review.适老化干预在农村和偏远地区的应用:一项范围综述。
Australas J Ageing. 2022 Dec;41(4):490-500. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13101. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
6
Patterns of health service use before and after a statewide fall prevention initiative for older adults at risk of falls.全州范围内针对有跌倒风险的老年人的跌倒预防计划前后的卫生服务使用模式。
Australas J Ageing. 2022 Dec;41(4):542-553. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13053. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
What long-term care interventions have been published between 2010 and 2020? Results of a WHO scoping review identifying long-term care interventions for older people around the world.2010 年至 2020 年期间发表了哪些长期护理干预措施?一项针对全球老年人的长期护理干预措施的世界卫生组织范围界定审查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):e054492. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054492.
8
Applying the lessons of implementation science to maximize feasibility and usability in team science intervention development.应用实施科学的经验教训,以在团队科学干预开发中最大限度地提高可行性和可用性。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul 22;5(1):e197. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.826. eCollection 2021.
9
After the Randomized Trial: Implementation of Community-Based Continence Promotion in the Real World.随机试验后:在现实世界中实施基于社区的控尿促进。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Nov;68(11):2668-2674. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16771. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
10
Outcomes associated with scale-up of the Stepping On falls prevention program: A case study in redesigning for dissemination.与逐步推进跌倒预防计划扩大规模相关的成果:一项关于重新设计以进行传播的案例研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Mar 4;4(3):250-259. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.17.