Freedman M, Oscar-Berman M
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Brain Cogn. 1989 Sep;11(1):114-26. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(89)90009-2.
Experimental paradigms adopted from animal models were used to compare the neuropsychological mechanisms underlying the dementias of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Two tasks were selected because characteristic profiles of impairment in nonhuman primates are seen following selective lesions of frontal cortex, temporal cortex, and fornix. The tasks consisted of a spatial and a visual learning problem, each with two components: (1) original learning and (2) reversal of the original learning. The Alzheimer's patients were significantly impaired on original learning and reversal learning in the visual modality compared with demented Parkinson's patients, even though both groups were equated for severity of dementia. On the spatial tasks, both the Alzheimer's and the demented Parkinson's patients were impaired on reversal learning but not on original learning. The profile of deficits on the visual tasks may serve to differentiate Alzheimer's from Parkinson's dementia and may reflect selective orbitofrontal system lesions in the former.
采用来自动物模型的实验范式来比较阿尔茨海默病和帕金森病痴呆症背后的神经心理学机制。选择了两项任务,因为在额叶皮质、颞叶皮质和穹窿选择性损伤后,非人类灵长类动物会出现特征性的损伤模式。这些任务包括一个空间学习问题和一个视觉学习问题,每个问题都有两个部分:(1)初始学习和(2)初始学习的反转。与帕金森病痴呆患者相比,阿尔茨海默病患者在视觉模式的初始学习和反转学习上有显著损伤,尽管两组痴呆严重程度相当。在空间任务中,阿尔茨海默病患者和帕金森病痴呆患者在反转学习上都有损伤,但在初始学习上没有。视觉任务上的缺陷模式可能有助于区分阿尔茨海默病和帕金森病痴呆,并且可能反映了前者选择性的眶额系统损伤。