Cassar Samantha, Misso Marie L, Hopkins William G, Shaw Christopher S, Teede Helena J, Stepto Nigel K
Institute of Sport Exercise and Active Living, College of Sport and Exercise Science, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria, 8001, Australia.
Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University in Partnership with Monash Health, Locked Bag 29, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov;31(11):2619-2631. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew243. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
What is the degree of intrinsic insulin resistance (IR) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and the relative contribution of BMI to overall IR based on meta-analysis of gold standard insulin clamp studies?
We report an inherent reduction (-27%) of insulin sensitivity (IS) in PCOS patients, which was independent of BMI.
PCOS is prevalent, complex and underpinned by IR but controversies surround the degree of intrinsic IR in PCOS, the effect of BMI and the impact of the different diagnostic criteria (NIH versus Rotterdam) in PCOS.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Medline and All EBM databases was undertaken of studies published up to 30 May 2015. Studies were included if premenopausal women diagnosed with PCOS were compared with a control group for IS, measured by the gold standard euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp. The systematic review adheres to the principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed using mixed modelling and magnitude-based inferences expressed as mean effect ±99% CI. We inferred the effect was small, moderate or large relative to a smallest important change of -3.7% or 3.8% derived by standardisation. Effects were deemed unclear when the CI overlapped smallest important positive and negative values. Effects were qualified with probabilities reflecting uncertainty in the magnitude of the true value (likely, 75-95%; very likely, 95-99.5%; most likely, >99.5%).
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHOD: A total of 4881 articles were returned from the search. Of these, 28 articles were included in the meta-analysis.
Overall IS was lower in women with PCOS compared with controls (mean effect -27%, 99% CI ±6%; large, most likely lower). A higher BMI exacerbated the reduction in IS by -15% (±8%; moderate, most likely lower) in PCOS compared with control women. There was no clear difference in IS between women diagnosed by the original National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria alone compared with those diagnosed by the Rotterdam criteria. Low levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were associated with reduced levels of IS (-10%, ±10%; small, very likely negative), which was not confounded by BMI.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis inherited the confounding problems of small sample sizes, missing data (e.g. some hormones, waist and hip girths) and the lack of Rotterdam criteria phenotype reporting, limiting the evidence synthesis and meta-analysis.
BMI has a greater impact on IS in PCOS than in controls. SHBG appears a potentially valuable marker of IR in PCOS, whereas testosterone after adjustment for BMI demonstrated an unexpected interplay with IS which warrants further investigation.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by grants from the National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC), grant number 606553 (H.J.T., N.K.S.), as well as Monash University. H.J.T. is an NHMRC Research Fellow. N.K.S. is supported through the Australian Government's Collaborative Research Networks (CRN) programme. The funding bodies played no role in the design, methods, data management or analysis or in the decision to publish. All authors declare no conflict of interests.
N/A.
基于金标准胰岛素钳夹研究的荟萃分析,多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)女性的内在胰岛素抵抗(IR)程度如何,以及体重指数(BMI)对总体IR的相对贡献是多少?
我们报告PCOS患者胰岛素敏感性(IS)存在内在降低(-27%),且这与BMI无关。
PCOS很常见且复杂,由IR所致,但围绕PCOS内在IR程度、BMI的影响以及PCOS不同诊断标准(美国国立卫生研究院标准与鹿特丹标准)的影响存在争议。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:对截至2015年5月30日发表的研究进行了Medline和所有循证医学数据库的系统评价和荟萃分析。如果将诊断为PCOS的绝经前女性与对照组进行IS比较,且IS通过金标准正常血糖-高胰岛素钳夹测量,则纳入研究。该系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。使用混合模型和基于量级的推断进行荟萃分析,以平均效应±99%置信区间表示。相对于标准化得出的最小重要变化-3.7%或3.8%,我们推断效应为小、中或大。当置信区间与最小重要正值和负值重叠时,效应被认为不明确。效应以反映真实值大小不确定性的概率进行限定(可能,75 - 95%;非常可能,95 - 99.5%;最可能,>99.5%)。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:检索共返回4881篇文章。其中,28篇文章纳入荟萃分析。
与对照组相比,PCOS女性的总体IS较低(平均效应-27%,99%置信区间±6%;大,最可能较低)。与对照女性相比,较高的BMI使PCOS患者的IS降低幅度加剧了-15%(±8%;中等,最可能较低)。仅根据原美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)标准诊断的女性与根据鹿特丹标准诊断的女性之间,IS无明显差异。低水平性激素结合球蛋白(SHBG)与IS水平降低相关(-10%,±10%;小,非常可能为负),且不受BMI影响。
局限性、注意事项:该系统评价和荟萃分析继承了小样本量、数据缺失(如一些激素、腰围和臀围)以及缺乏鹿特丹标准表型报告等混杂问题,限制了证据综合和荟萃分析。
BMI对PCOS患者IS的影响大于对照组。SHBG似乎是PCOS中IR的一个潜在有价值的标志物,而调整BMI后的睾酮与IS表现出意想不到的相互作用,值得进一步研究。
研究资金/利益冲突:这项工作得到了澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会(NHMRC)的资助,资助编号606553(H.J.T.,N.K.S.),以及莫纳什大学的资助。H.J.T.是NHMRC研究员。N.K.S.通过澳大利亚政府的合作研究网络(CRN)计划获得支持。资助机构在设计、方法、数据管理或分析以及发表决策中未发挥作用。所有作者均声明无利益冲突。
无。