• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高等教育中的合作学习:激发积极的相互依赖关系。

Collaborative Learning in Higher Education: Evoking Positive Interdependence.

作者信息

Scager Karin, Boonstra Johannes, Peeters Ton, Vulperhorst Jonne, Wiegant Fred

机构信息

Department of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands

Department of Biology, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219
PMID:27909019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5132366/
Abstract

Collaborative learning is a widely used instructional method, but the learning potential of this instructional method is often underused in practice. Therefore, the importance of various factors underlying effective collaborative learning should be determined. In the current study, five different life sciences undergraduate courses with successful collaborative-learning results were selected. This study focuses on factors that increased the effectiveness of collaboration in these courses, according to the students. Nine focus group interviews were conducted and analyzed. Results show that factors evoking effective collaboration were student autonomy and self-regulatory behavior, combined with a challenging, open, and complex group task that required the students to create something new and original. The design factors of these courses fostered a sense of responsibility and of shared ownership of both the collaborative process and the end product of the group assignment. In addition, students reported the absence of any free riders in these group assignments. Interestingly, it was observed that students seemed to value their sense of achievement, their learning processes, and the products they were working on more than their grades. It is concluded that collaborative learning in higher education should be designed using challenging and relevant tasks that build shared ownership with students.

摘要

合作学习是一种广泛使用的教学方法,但这种教学方法的学习潜力在实践中常常未得到充分利用。因此,应确定有效合作学习背后各种因素的重要性。在当前的研究中,选取了五门不同的生命科学本科课程,这些课程的合作学习成果显著。本研究聚焦于学生认为在这些课程中提高合作有效性的因素。进行并分析了九次焦点小组访谈。结果表明,引发有效合作的因素包括学生的自主性和自我调节行为,以及具有挑战性、开放性和复杂性的小组任务,该任务要求学生创造新颖独特的东西。这些课程的设计因素培养了学生对合作过程和小组作业最终成果的责任感和共同所有权意识。此外,学生们表示在这些小组作业中没有出现任何搭便车的现象。有趣的是,观察发现学生们似乎更看重自己的成就感、学习过程以及正在完成的作品,而非成绩。研究得出结论,高等教育中的合作学习应采用具有挑战性且相关的任务来设计,从而与学生建立共同所有权意识。

相似文献

1
Collaborative Learning in Higher Education: Evoking Positive Interdependence.高等教育中的合作学习:激发积极的相互依赖关系。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219.
2
Five heads are better than one: preliminary results of team-based learning in a communication disorders graduate course.三个臭皮匠,赛过诸葛亮:沟通障碍研究生课程中基于团队学习的初步结果。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Jan;51(1):44-60. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12184. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
3
Differential impact of student behaviours on group interaction and collaborative learning: medical students' and tutors' perspectives.学生行为对小组互动和协作学习的不同影响:医学生和导师的观点
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 22;16(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0730-1.
4
An instructional intervention to encourage effective deep collaborative learning in undergraduate veterinary students.一项旨在鼓励本科兽医学生进行有效深度协作学习的教学干预措施。
J Vet Med Educ. 2010 Winter;37(4):369-76. doi: 10.3138/jvme.37.4.369.
5
Using wikis to stimulate collaborative learning in two online health sciences courses.在两门在线健康科学课程中使用维基百科促进协作学习。
J Nurs Educ. 2015 Jun;54(6):352-5. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20150515-08.
6
Students' preferences for collaborative learning processes.
Nursingconnections. 2000 Spring;13(1):53-71.
7
Developing and Evaluating Collaborative Online-Based Instructional Designs in Health Information Management.健康信息管理中基于在线协作的教学设计的开发与评估
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;243:8-12.
8
Tackling student neurophobia in neurosciences block with team-based learning.通过基于团队的学习解决神经科学课程中学生的神经恐惧症。
Med Educ Online. 2015 Jul 30;20:28461. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28461. eCollection 2015.
9
The impact of an interprofessional problem-based learning curriculum of clinical ethics on medical and nursing students' attitudes and ability of interprofessional collaboration: a pilot study.跨专业以问题为基础的临床伦理课程对医学生和护生的态度和跨专业合作能力的影响:一项试点研究。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013 Sep;29(9):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
10
Collaborative group work: effects of group size and assignment structure on learning gain, student satisfaction and perceived participation.协作小组作业:小组规模和任务结构对学习增益、学生满意度和感知参与度的影响。
Med Teach. 2011;33(12):983-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.588733.

引用本文的文献

1
Educators' digital competence in physiotherapy and health professions education: Insights from qualitative interviews.物理治疗与健康专业教育中教育工作者的数字能力:质性访谈的见解
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 8;10:20552076241297044. doi: 10.1177/20552076241297044. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Application of PBL combined with CBL teaching method in clinical teaching of vascular surgery.PBL 结合 CBL 教学法在血管外科临床教学中的应用。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 15;19(8):e0306653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306653. eCollection 2024.
3
It Takes Two: Online and In-person Discussions Offer Complementary Learning Opportunities for Students.双管齐下:线上和线下讨论为学生提供互补的学习机会。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Sep;23(3):ar34. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-04-0062.
4
Generative preparation tasks in digital collaborative learning: actor and partner effects of constructive preparation activities on deep comprehension.数字协作学习中的生成性准备任务:建设性准备活动对深度理解的参与者和伙伴效应
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 19;15:1335682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335682. eCollection 2024.
5
A Mixed-Method Analytical Cross-Sectional Research on Participation-Centered Learning Behaviors for Adolescent and Adult Learners Utilizing a Validated Learning Behavior Questionnaire.一项运用经过验证的学习行为问卷对青少年和成年学习者以参与为中心的学习行为进行的混合方法分析性横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 27;16(4):e59178. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59178. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Interprofessional socialization of first-year medical and midwifery students: effects of an ultra-brief anatomy training.一年级医学和助产专业学生的跨专业社会化:超简短解剖学培训的效果
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05451-w.
7
Human and AI collaboration in the higher education environment: opportunities and concerns.人工智能在高等教育环境中的应用:机遇与挑战
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Apr 8;9(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00547-9.
8
Evaluation of ChatGPT's Real-Life Implementation in Undergraduate Dental Education: Mixed Methods Study.评价 ChatGPT 在本科牙科教育中的实际应用:混合方法研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Jan 31;10:e51344. doi: 10.2196/51344.
9
Enhancing ESL learner's literacy by peer-assisted learning strategy of online English news.通过在线英语新闻的同伴辅助学习策略提高英语作为第二语言学习者的读写能力。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 30;14:1172099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172099. eCollection 2023.
10
Forming Groups in a Large-Enrollment Biology Class: Group Permanence Matters More than Group Size.在大型生物学课中分组:组的稳定性比组的大小更重要。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Dec;22(4):ar37. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-08-0172.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive Style as Environmentally Sensitive Individual Differences in Cognition: A Modern Synthesis and Applications in Education, Business, and Management.认知风格:认知的环境敏感个体差异——现代综合与教育、商业和管理中的应用。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 May;15(1):3-33. doi: 10.1177/1529100614525555.
2
Is Peer Interaction Necessary for Optimal Active Learning?同伴互动对于实现最佳主动学习是否必要?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Summer;13(2):243-52. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-10-0201.
3
An undergraduate course to bridge the gap between textbooks and scientific research.一门衔接教材与科研的本科生课程。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Spring;10(1):83-94. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-08-0100.
4
The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom.教师在促进课堂合作对话中的角色。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Mar;79(Pt 1):1-28. doi: 10.1348/000709908X380772. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
5
From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis.从文本到编码:定性内容分析中的编码员信度评估
Nurs Res. 2008 Mar-Apr;57(2):113-7. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000313482.33917.7d.
6
Analysis of verbal interactions in tutorial groups: a process study.辅导小组中的言语互动分析:一项过程研究。
Med Educ. 2006 Feb;40(2):129-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02368.x.
7
Are the concepts of andragogy and pedagogy relevant to veterinary undergraduate teaching?成人教育和儿童教育的概念与兽医本科教学有关吗?
J Vet Med Educ. 2003 Fall;30(3):247-53. doi: 10.3138/jvme.30.3.247.
8
A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships.团队效能、能力及绩效的元分析:相互依存性与分析层次作为观测关系的调节变量
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Oct;87(5):819-32. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819.
9
Getting the focus and the group: enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research.把握重点与分组:提高焦点小组研究的分析严谨性
Qual Health Res. 2000 May;10(3):293-308. doi: 10.1177/104973200129118453.
10
A qualitative study utilizing a focus group to explore the role and concept of the nurse practitioner.
J Adv Nurs. 1998 Jun;27(6):1202-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00648.x.