Rault Jean-Loup, Clark Katie, Groves Peter J, Cronin Greg M
University of Melbourne, Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia.
University of Sydney, Poultry Research Foundation, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Camden NSW 2570, Australia.
Poult Sci. 2017 Apr 1;96(4):779-787. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew423.
Light intensity can influence broiler behavior, but discrepancies in the scientific literature remain. Furthermore, few studies have investigated the welfare implications induced by varying light intensity. We investigated the effects of providing 5 or 20 lux light intensity on broiler behavior, welfare and productivity. A total of 1,872 Ross 308 broilers of mixed sex were studied across 2 replicates. Treatments began on d 8 with one of 2 light intensity levels: 5 lux or 20 lux, using LED lights on a 16L:8D photoperiod with 30 min sunrise and sunset periods. Production data, behavioral activity, and plasma samples for corticosterone concentration analysis were collected weekly from 8 to 46 d of age. Eye weight was collected at 42 d of age. Leg strength was assessed at 35, 42 and 45 d of age using the latency to lie test and leg and foot conditions (foot pad dermatitis, hock burn, leg straightness) were assessed at 46 d. Live weight differed between light treatments, with broilers kept at 20 lux being lighter than broilers kept at 5 lux at 46 d of age (males: -5.1%, females: -2.8%, P < 0.0001), despite no significant differences in feed intake. However, broilers kept at 20 lux were more active during the photophase than broilers kept at 5 lux throughout the rearing period (P < 0.0001). Eye weight was also on average 5% lighter for broilers kept at 20 lux compared to 5 lux (P = 0.001). Nonetheless, there was no significant effect of light intensity on other measures of broiler welfare: mortality and culls, plasma corticosterone concentrations, or latency to lie reflective of leg strength. Hence, broilers kept at 20 lux compared to 5 lux were found to be more active, had slower growth, and had lighter eye weight, but other welfare measures reflective of biological functioning or leg health did not show significant changes.
光照强度会影响肉鸡的行为,但科学文献中仍存在差异。此外,很少有研究调查不同光照强度对福利的影响。我们研究了提供5勒克斯或20勒克斯光照强度对肉鸡行为、福利和生产性能的影响。总共对1872只混合性别的罗斯308肉鸡进行了2次重复研究。处理从第8天开始,采用两种光照强度水平之一:5勒克斯或20勒克斯,使用LED灯,光照周期为16小时光照:8小时黑暗,日出和日落各30分钟。从8日龄至46日龄每周收集生产数据、行为活动数据以及用于分析皮质酮浓度的血浆样本。在42日龄时收集眼重。在35、42和45日龄时使用躺卧潜伏期测试评估腿部力量,并在46日龄时评估腿部和足部状况(脚垫皮炎、跗关节灼伤、腿部笔直度)。光照处理之间的活重存在差异,46日龄时,饲养在20勒克斯光照下的肉鸡比饲养在5勒克斯光照下的肉鸡轻(雄性:-5.1%,雌性:-2.8%,P<0.0001),尽管采食量没有显著差异。然而,在整个饲养期内,饲养在20勒克斯光照下肉鸡在光照阶段比饲养在5勒克斯光照下的肉鸡更活跃(P<0.0001)。与5勒克斯光照下的肉鸡相比,饲养在20勒克斯光照下的肉鸡眼重平均也轻5%(P=0.001)。尽管如此,光照强度对肉鸡福利的其他指标没有显著影响:死亡率和淘汰率、血浆皮质酮浓度或反映腿部力量的躺卧潜伏期。因此,与5勒克斯光照相比,饲养在20勒克斯光照下的肉鸡更活跃,生长较慢,眼重较轻,但反映生物功能或腿部健康的其他福利指标没有显著变化。