Suppr超能文献

风湿病学质量测量的新时代:电子临床质量指标与国家登记系统。

A new era of quality measurement in rheumatology: electronic clinical quality measures and national registries.

作者信息

Tonner Chris, Schmajuk Gabriela, Yazdany Jinoos

机构信息

aDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco bDivision of Rheumatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;29(2):131-137. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000364.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the evolution of quality measurement in rheumatology, highlighting new health-information technology infrastructure and standards that are enabling unprecedented innovation in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Spurred by landmark legislation that ties physician payment to value, the widespread use of electronic health records, and standards such as the Quality Data Model, quality measurement in rheumatology is rapidly evolving. Rather than relying on retrospective assessments of care gathered through administrative claims or manual chart abstraction, new electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) allow automated data capture from electronic health records. At the same time, qualified clinical data registries, like the American College of Rheumatology's Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registry, are enabling large-scale implementation of eCQMs across national electronic health record networks with real-time performance feedback to clinicians. Although successful examples of eCQM development and implementation in rheumatology and other fields exist, there also remain challenges, such as lack of health system data interoperability and problems with measure accuracy.

SUMMARY

Quality measurement and improvement is increasingly an essential component of rheumatology practice. Advances in health information technology are likely to continue to make implementation of eCQMs easier and measurement more clinically meaningful and accurate in coming years.

摘要

综述目的

本文回顾了风湿病学质量测量的发展历程,重点介绍了新的健康信息技术基础设施和标准,这些正推动该领域实现前所未有的创新。

最新发现

在将医生薪酬与医疗价值挂钩的里程碑式立法、电子健康记录的广泛使用以及诸如质量数据模型等标准的推动下,风湿病学的质量测量正在迅速发展。新的电子临床质量指标(eCQMs)不再依赖通过行政索赔或人工病历摘要收集的护理回顾性评估,而是允许从电子健康记录中自动获取数据。与此同时,合格的临床数据登记处,如美国风湿病学会的风湿病疗效信息系统登记处,正在全国电子健康记录网络中大规模实施eCQMs,并为临床医生提供实时绩效反馈。尽管在风湿病学和其他领域存在eCQM开发和实施的成功案例,但仍存在挑战,如卫生系统数据缺乏互操作性以及测量准确性问题。

总结

质量测量与改进日益成为风湿病学实践的重要组成部分。未来几年,健康信息技术的进步可能会继续使eCQMs的实施更加容易,测量在临床上更具意义和准确性。

相似文献

1
A new era of quality measurement in rheumatology: electronic clinical quality measures and national registries.
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;29(2):131-137. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000364.
2
Development of the American College of Rheumatology's Rheumatoid Arthritis Electronic Clinical Quality Measures.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Nov;68(11):1579-1590. doi: 10.1002/acr.22984.
4
Development of the American College of Rheumatology Electronic Clinical Quality Measures for Gout.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 May;70(5):659-671. doi: 10.1002/acr.23500. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
5
Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness: A National Informatics-Enabled Registry for Quality Improvement.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Dec;68(12):1866-1873. doi: 10.1002/acr.23089.
9
The present and future of quality measures and public reporting in neurosurgery.
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E3. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.FOCUS15354.
10
Improving quality through clinical registries in urology.
Curr Opin Urol. 2017 Jul;27(4):375-379. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000406.

引用本文的文献

1
Using artificial intelligence to develop a measure of orthopaedic treatment success from clinical notes.
Front Digit Health. 2025 Apr 24;7:1523953. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1523953. eCollection 2025.
3
Quality Measures in Systemic Sclerosis.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 4;13(4):579. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040579.
4
A Systematic Review of Electronic Medical Record Driven Quality Measurement and Feedback Systems.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):200. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010200.
6
Identification of Five Quality Needs for Rheumatology (Text Analysis and Literature Review).
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 25;8:757102. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.757102. eCollection 2021.
7
Digital health technologies: opportunities and challenges in rheumatology.
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;16(9):525-535. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0461-x. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
8
Extraction of Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Measures From Electronic Health Records Using Automated Processing Algorithms.
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2019 Oct 30;1(10):632-639. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11089. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
Unmet need in rheumatology: reports from the Targeted Therapies meeting 2019.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jan;79(1):88-93. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216151. Epub 2019 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness: A National Informatics-Enabled Registry for Quality Improvement.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Dec;68(12):1866-1873. doi: 10.1002/acr.23089.
2
Development of the American College of Rheumatology's Rheumatoid Arthritis Electronic Clinical Quality Measures.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Nov;68(11):1579-1590. doi: 10.1002/acr.22984.
3
Methods for Developing the American College of Rheumatology's Electronic Clinical Quality Measures.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Oct;68(10):1402-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.22985. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
4
Implementing MACRA: Implications for Physicians and for Physician Leadership.
JAMA. 2016 Jun 14;315(22):2397-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7041.
5
Automatic quality improvement reports in the intensive care unit: One step closer toward meaningful use.
World J Crit Care Med. 2016 May 4;5(2):165-70. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i2.165.
6
Validation of Stroke Meaningful Use Measures in a National Electronic Health Record System.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):46-52. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3562-5.
7
Extracting information from the text of electronic medical records to improve case detection: a systematic review.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):1007-15. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv180. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
8
Electronic Health Record Use a Bitter Pill for Many Physicians.
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2016 Jan 1;13(Winter):1d. eCollection 2016.
9
Evaluating the feasibility and utility of translating Choosing Wisely recommendations into e-Measures.
Healthc (Amst). 2015 Mar;3(1):24-37. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
10
Natural language processing as an alternative to manual reporting of colonoscopy quality metrics.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):512-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.049. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验