Kitchens J M, Pfeifer M P
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Kentucky.
J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Sep-Oct;4(5):384-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02599686.
To teach internal medicine residents key principles of clinical epidemiology that are necessary to read critically the medical literature.
Two-phase, non-randomized, controlled educational trial.
University-based training program for residents (PGY-l-PGY-3) in internal medicine.
All 83 residents participated in the trial. Seventy residents completed a test in clinical epidemiology at the end of Phases I and II.
Residents were assigned to one of eight ambulatory care clinics for half a day each week. A literature-based curriculum in critical appraisal was the subject of a weekly pre-clinic conference for four clinics (Group A). The other four clinics (Group B) had a weekly conference on topics in ambulatory care medicine. At the end of Phase I, both groups were given a test of basic knowledge of clinical epidemiology. The curriculum was then modified with the addition of written questions to emphasize important educational points and to stimulate resident participation. The modified curriculum became the subject of the pre-clinic conference for Group B, while Group A changed to topics in ambulatory medicine. At the end of Phase II both groups were again tested on basic knowledge of clinical epidemiology.
Group B performed significantly better on the second test than on the first, 68.5% vs. 63.3% (p = 0.034), while Group A did not improve (64.5% vs. 65.9%). The differences in test scores for Test II minus Test I were +5.17% in Group B and -1.44% in Group A (p = 0.019). Twenty-one percent of Group B residents vs. 5% of Group A residents improved their scores by 18% or more.
The residency period is a difficult but important time to teach critical appraisal skills. Educational gains may be small and need to be critically evaluated to stimulate the development of more effective educational programs.
教授内科住院医师临床流行病学的关键原则,这些原则是批判性阅读医学文献所必需的。
两阶段、非随机、对照教育试验。
基于大学的内科住院医师(PGY-1至PGY-3)培训项目。
所有83名住院医师参与了试验。70名住院医师在第一阶段和第二阶段结束时完成了临床流行病学测试。
住院医师被分配到八个门诊护理诊所之一,每周半天。四个诊所(A组)的每周诊所前会议以基于文献的批判性评估课程为主题。其他四个诊所(B组)每周就门诊护理医学主题举行会议。在第一阶段结束时,两组都接受了临床流行病学基础知识测试。然后对课程进行修改,增加书面问题以强调重要的教育要点并激发住院医师的参与度。修改后的课程成为B组诊所前会议的主题,而A组则改为门诊医学主题。在第二阶段结束时,两组再次接受临床流行病学基础知识测试。
B组在第二次测试中的表现明显优于第一次,分别为68.5%和63.3%(p = 0.034),而A组没有提高(64.5%对65.9%)。第二次测试减去第一次测试的分数差异在B组为+5.17%,在A组为-1.44%(p = 0.019)。B组21%的住院医师与A组5%的住院医师分数提高了18%或更多。
住院医师培训期是教授批判性评估技能的困难但重要的时期。教育成果可能很小,需要进行严格评估以促进更有效的教育项目的发展。