• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定性理解患者和卫生专业人员对 BRECONDA 乳房重建决策辅助工具的体验。

Qualitatively understanding patients' and health professionals' experiences of the BRECONDA breast reconstruction decision aid.

机构信息

Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2017 Oct;26(10):1618-1624. doi: 10.1002/pon.4346. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1002/pon.4346
PMID:27957772
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Women diagnosed with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ and those with a genetic susceptibility to developing this disease face the challenging decision of whether or not to undergo breast reconstruction following mastectomy. As part of a large randomized controlled trial, this qualitative study examined women's experiences of using the Breast RECONstruction Decision Aid (BRECONDA) and health professionals' feedback regarding the impact of this resource on patients' knowledge and decision making about breast reconstruction.

METHOD

Semistructured interviews were conducted with women who accessed the BRECONDA intervention (N = 36) and with their healthcare providers (N = 6). All interviews were transcribed verbatim and subjected to thematic analysis by 3 independent coders.

RESULTS

Participants reported an overall positive impression, with all interviewees endorsing this decision aid as a useful resource for women considering reconstructive surgery. Thematic analysis of patient interviews revealed 4 themes: overall impressions and aesthetics; personal relevance and utility; introducing BRECONDA; and advantages and suggested improvements. Analysis of health professionals' interviews also revealed 4 themes: need for BRECONDA, impact of BRECONDA, potential difficulties that may arise in using the decision aid, and recommending BRECONDA to patients. Patients indicated that they derived benefit from this resource at all stages of their decision-making process, with the greatest perceived benefit being for those early in their breast reconstruction journey.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the use of BRECONDA as an adjunct to clinical consultation and other information sources.

摘要

目的

被诊断患有乳腺癌或导管原位癌的女性,以及那些有遗传易感性患上这种疾病的女性,都面临着一个艰难的决定,即是否在乳房切除术后进行乳房重建。作为一项大型随机对照试验的一部分,这项定性研究调查了女性使用乳房重建决策辅助工具(BRECONDA)的体验,以及卫生专业人员对该资源对患者关于乳房重建的知识和决策的影响的反馈。

方法

对使用 BRECONDA 干预措施的女性(N=36)和她们的医疗保健提供者(N=6)进行了半结构化访谈。所有访谈都逐字转录,并由 3 位独立的编码员进行主题分析。

结果

参与者报告了总体上的积极印象,所有受访者都认为该决策辅助工具是考虑重建手术的女性的有用资源。对患者访谈的主题分析揭示了 4 个主题:总体印象和美学;个人相关性和实用性;引入 BRECONDA;以及优势和建议的改进。对卫生专业人员访谈的分析也揭示了 4 个主题:对 BRECONDA 的需求、BRECONDA 的影响、在使用决策辅助工具时可能出现的潜在困难,以及向患者推荐 BRECONDA。患者表示,他们在决策过程的所有阶段都从该资源中受益,最大的受益是那些在乳房重建早期的患者。

结论

这些发现支持将 BRECONDA 用作临床咨询和其他信息来源的辅助工具。

相似文献

1
Qualitatively understanding patients' and health professionals' experiences of the BRECONDA breast reconstruction decision aid.定性理解患者和卫生专业人员对 BRECONDA 乳房重建决策辅助工具的体验。
Psychooncology. 2017 Oct;26(10):1618-1624. doi: 10.1002/pon.4346. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
2
Cost-effectiveness of the BRECONDA decision aid for women with breast cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial.BRECONDA 决策辅助工具对乳腺癌女性的成本效益:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Psychooncology. 2018 Jun;27(6):1589-1596. doi: 10.1002/pon.4698. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
3
Reducing Decisional Conflict and Enhancing Satisfaction with Information among Women Considering Breast Reconstruction following Mastectomy: Results from the BRECONDA Randomized Controlled Trial.减少乳房切除术后考虑乳房重建的女性的决策冲突并提高其对信息的满意度:BRECONDA随机对照试验的结果
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Oct;138(4):592e-602e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002538.
4
Facilitating decision-making in women undergoing genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer: BRECONDA randomized controlled trial results.促进遗传性乳腺癌基因检测女性的决策制定:BRECONDA 随机对照试验结果。
Breast. 2017 Dec;36:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
5
The impact on Australian women of lack of choice of breast reconstruction options: A qualitative study.澳大利亚女性因缺乏乳房重建选择而受到的影响:一项定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2019 Mar;28(3):547-552. doi: 10.1002/pon.4974. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
6
Satisfaction following immediate breast reconstruction: Experiences in the early post-operative stage.即刻乳房重建术后的满意度:术后早期的经验
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Sep;20(3):579-93. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12112. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
7
The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.一项针对考虑即刻乳房重建的乳腺癌女性的在线患者决策辅助工具的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 19;19(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0873-1.
8
Choosing reconstruction after mastectomy: a qualitative analysis.乳房切除术后重建的选择:一项定性分析。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998 May;25(4):743-50.
9
'They were aware of who I was as a person': Patients' and health professionals' experiences of using the PEGASUS intervention to facilitate decision-making around breast reconstruction.“他们了解我作为一个人的身份”:患者和健康专业人员在使用 PEGASUS 干预措施来促进乳房重建决策方面的经验。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Sep;30(5):e13464. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13464. Epub 2021 May 24.
10
BRECONDA: development and acceptability of an interactive decisional support tool for women considering breast reconstruction.BRECONDA:一种面向考虑乳房重建的女性的交互式决策支持工具的开发与可接受性
Psychooncology. 2014 Jul;23(7):835-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.3498. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-making Tools for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.乳房切除术后乳房重建的决策工具:一项范围综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Apr 21;13(4):e6710. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006710. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Assessment of Appearance-related Questions About Breast Reconstruction Generated by Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer.由聊天生成式预训练变换器生成的关于乳房重建的外貌相关问题评估
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Mar 21;13(3):e6625. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006625. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Patients' and plastic surgeons' experiences with an online patient decision aid for breast reconstruction: considerations for nationwide implementation.
患者与整形外科医生使用乳房重建在线患者决策辅助工具的体验:全国推广的考量因素
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 6;25(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02832-5.
4
To Reconstruct or Not to Reconstruct: Piloting a Vietnamese and Arabic Breast Reconstruction Decision Aid in Australia.是否重建:在澳大利亚试用越南语和阿拉伯语的乳房重建决策辅助工具。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jun 28;31(7):3713-3737. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31070274.
5
Information needs in breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a qualitative analysis of free-text responses from 2077 women.乳房切除术后乳房重建的信息需求:对 2077 名女性自由文本回复的定性分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 May;205(1):147-157. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07240-3. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
6
Implementing shared decision-making interventions in breast cancer clinical practice: a scoping review.在乳腺癌临床实践中实施共同决策干预措施:范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02263-8.
7
Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.乳腺癌患者乳房重建中的共同决策:一项范围综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Dec 10;15:2763-2781. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S335080. eCollection 2021.
8
Development of a patient decision aid for patients with breast cancer who consider immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy.开发一种适用于考虑在乳房切除术后立即进行乳房重建的乳腺癌患者的患者决策辅助工具。
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):232-244. doi: 10.1111/hex.13368. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
9
'They were aware of who I was as a person': Patients' and health professionals' experiences of using the PEGASUS intervention to facilitate decision-making around breast reconstruction.“他们了解我作为一个人的身份”:患者和健康专业人员在使用 PEGASUS 干预措施来促进乳房重建决策方面的经验。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Sep;30(5):e13464. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13464. Epub 2021 May 24.
10
Management of patients with BRCA mutation from the point of view of a breast surgeon.从乳腺外科医生的角度看BRCA突变患者的管理
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Apr 16;65:102311. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102311. eCollection 2021 May.