• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Holden Communication Scale (HCS) for persons with dementia.针对痴呆症患者的霍尔登沟通量表(HCS)的心理测量评估。
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 13;6(12):e013447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013447.
2
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Threadgold Communication Tool for Persons with Dementia.针对痴呆症患者的Threadgold沟通工具的心理测量评估
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2016 Apr 30;6(1):150-60. doi: 10.1159/000444789. eCollection 2016 Jan-Apr.
3
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Holden Communication Scale.《 Holden 沟通量表土耳其文版的有效性和信度》。
Brain Behav. 2023 Sep;13(9):e3223. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3223. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
4
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].[法语使用者病前智力水平的评估]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x.
5
Reliability and Validity of a Novel Internet-Based Battery to Assess Mood and Cognitive Function in the Elderly.一种新型基于互联网的评估老年人情绪和认知功能的测试组合的信度和效度
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Oct 18;54(4):1359-1364. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160441.
6
[Reliability and validity of the Severe Impairment Battery, short form (SIB-s), in patients with dementia in Spain].[西班牙痴呆患者严重损伤量表简版(SIB-s)的信效度]
Rev Neurol. 2015 Jan 1;60(1):1-9.
7
Validation of the Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living in Persons with Mild Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (ETAM).埃尔朗根日常生活活动能力测试在轻度痴呆或轻度认知障碍患者中的效度验证(ETAM)。
BMC Geriatr. 2016 May 26;16:111. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0271-9.
8
The Danish version of the Baylor Profound Mental State Examination.贝勒深度精神状态检查的丹麦语版本。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;66(3):198-202. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2011.614959. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
9
Neuropsychological assessment of severely demeted elderly: the severe cognitive impairment profile.重度痴呆老年人的神经心理学评估:严重认知障碍概况。
Arch Neurol. 1996 Apr;53(4):367-72. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1996.00550040107020.
10
Severe Impairment Battery Language scale: a language-assessment tool for Alzheimer's disease patients.严重损伤成套测验语言量表:一种用于阿尔茨海默病患者的语言评估工具。
Alzheimers Dement. 2009 Sep;5(5):375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.04.1236.

引用本文的文献

1
A Protocol for Enhancing Allied Health Care for Older People in Residential Care: The EAHOP Intervention.一项加强养老院老年人联合健康护理的方案:EAHOP 干预措施。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;13(3):341. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030341.
2
Virtual individual cognitive stimulation therapy (V-iCST): Mixed methods feasibility randomised controlled trial.虚拟个体认知刺激疗法(V-iCST):混合方法可行性随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Oct-Dec;24(4):100523. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100523. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
3
Cognitive stimulation in activities of daily living for individuals with mild-to-moderate dementia (CS-ADL): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.日常生活活动中的认知刺激对轻中度痴呆患者的影响(CS-ADL):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 3;19(9):e0309337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309337. eCollection 2024.
4
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Holden Communication Scale.《 Holden 沟通量表土耳其文版的有效性和信度》。
Brain Behav. 2023 Sep;13(9):e3223. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3223. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
5
Cognitive interventions for memory and psychological well-being in aging and dementias.针对衰老和痴呆症患者记忆及心理健康的认知干预措施。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 2;14:1070012. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1070012. eCollection 2023.
6
Implementing Affordable Socially Assistive Pet Robots in Care Homes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stratified Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial and Mixed Methods Study.在新冠疫情之前及期间在养老院实施经济适用型社会辅助宠物机器人:分层整群随机对照试验和混合方法研究
JMIR Aging. 2022 Aug 24;5(3):e38864. doi: 10.2196/38864.
7
Animal-Assisted Therapy Improves Communication and Mobility among Institutionalized People with Cognitive Impairment.动物辅助疗法改善认知障碍患者的交流和移动能力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 14;17(16):5899. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165899.
8
Effect of the Sonas Programme on Communication in People with Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.索纳斯项目对痴呆症患者沟通能力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2017 Apr 7;7(1):122-135. doi: 10.1159/000468147. eCollection 2017 Jan-Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Threadgold Communication Tool for Persons with Dementia.针对痴呆症患者的Threadgold沟通工具的心理测量评估
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2016 Apr 30;6(1):150-60. doi: 10.1159/000444789. eCollection 2016 Jan-Apr.
2
Sensory stimulation for persons with dementia: a review of the literature.痴呆症患者的感觉刺激:文献综述
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jul;25(13-14):1805-34. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13169. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
3
Cognitive decline in dementia with Lewy bodies: a 5-year prospective cohort study.路易体痴呆中的认知衰退:一项5年前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 29;6(2):e010357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010357.
4
Altered sense of humor in dementia.痴呆症患者幽默感的改变。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;49(1):111-9. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150413.
5
Joy, happiness, and humor in dementia care: a qualitative study.痴呆症护理中的喜悦、幸福与幽默:一项定性研究。
Creat Nurs. 2015;21(1):47-52. doi: 10.1891/1078-4535.21.1.47.
6
Humour in adult cancer care: a concept analysis.成人癌症护理中的幽默:概念分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Sep;69(9):2131-40. doi: 10.1111/jan.12059. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
7
The prevalence and course of neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing home patients with dementia: a systematic review.养老院痴呆患者神经精神症状的患病率和病程:系统评价。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Mar;14(3):161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.09.027. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
8
What affects pleasure in persons with advanced stage dementia?晚期痴呆症患者的愉悦感受哪些因素影响?
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Mar;46(3):402-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.12.003. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
9
Language and Dementia: Neuropsychological Aspects.语言与痴呆症:神经心理学方面
Annu Rev Appl Linguist. 2008 Jan 1;28:73-90. doi: 10.1017/S0267190508080045.
10
Methods to Enhance Verbal Communication between Individuals with Alzheimer's Disease and Their Formal and Informal Caregivers: A Systematic Review.增强阿尔茨海默病患者与其正式和非正式护理人员之间言语交流的方法:一项系统综述
Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2010 Jun 3;2010:906818. doi: 10.4061/2010/906818.

针对痴呆症患者的霍尔登沟通量表(HCS)的心理测量评估。

Psychometric evaluation of the Holden Communication Scale (HCS) for persons with dementia.

作者信息

Strøm Benedicte Sørensen, Engedal Knut, Šaltytė Benth Jūratė, Grov Ellen-Karine

机构信息

VID Specialized University, Center for Diakonia and Professional Practice, Oslo, Norway.

Norwegian Advisory Unit for Aging and Health, Vestfold Hospital HF, Tønsberg, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 13;6(12):e013447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013447.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013447
PMID:27965255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5168700/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the psychometric properties of the Holden Communication Scale (HCS) and the association between scores on HCS and cognitive function among persons with dementia.

METHOD

Internal consistency was assessed by the Cronbach's α coefficient and inter-item correlations. Test-retest was carried out to test the instrument's stability. An exploratory factor analysis with the principal components extraction method and oblimin rotation was performed to evaluate construct validity. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to explore associations between the scores on the HCS and cognitive function.

RESULTS

A total of 128 persons with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment (mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 8.9 (SD 7.0)) participated. The mean age was 85.2 (SD 7.2) and 101 of the participants were women. The Cronbach's α of the HCS was 0.94 and test-retest reliability was r=0.71. The corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.63 to 0.79 and factor analysis showed a 1-factor structure of the HCS, which explained 63% of the variance. However, a forced 3-factor structure explained 76% of the variance. The correlation between cognitive function as measured by the MMSE and ability to communicate as measured with HCS was found to be moderate for those with an MMSE score of 0-10 (-0.61) and low for persons with an MMSE score of 11-20 (-0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The HCS is a reliable and valid scale for assessing communication ability in persons with moderate and severe cognitive impairment, and might have a 1-factor or 3-factor structure.

摘要

目的

探讨霍尔登沟通量表(HCS)的心理测量特性以及痴呆患者HCS得分与认知功能之间的关联。

方法

通过克朗巴赫α系数和项目间相关性评估内部一致性。进行重测以检验该工具的稳定性。采用主成分提取法和斜交旋转进行探索性因素分析,以评估结构效度。计算皮尔逊相关系数,以探讨HCS得分与认知功能之间的关联。

结果

共有128名中重度认知障碍患者(简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)平均得分8.9(标准差7.0))参与研究。平均年龄为85.2(标准差7.2),其中101名参与者为女性。HCS的克朗巴赫α系数为0.94,重测信度为r = 0.71。校正后的项目总分相关性范围为0.63至0.79,因素分析显示HCS具有单因素结构,解释了63%的方差。然而,强制的三因素结构解释了76%的方差。发现MMSE测量的认知功能与HCS测量的沟通能力之间的相关性,对于MMSE评分为0 - 10的患者为中度(-0.61),对于MMSE评分为11 - 20的患者为低度(-0.06)。

结论

HCS是评估中重度认知障碍患者沟通能力的可靠且有效的量表,可能具有单因素或三因素结构。