Rahat-Rozenbloom S, Fernandes J, Cheng J, Gloor G B, Wolever T M S
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Biostatistics Unit, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 50 Charlton East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017 Feb;71(2):227-233. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.248. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Colonic fermentation of dietary fiber to short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) may protect against obesity and diabetes, but excess production of colonic SCFA has been implicated in the promotion of obesity. We aimed to compare the effects of two fermentable fibers on postprandial SCFA and second-meal glycemic response in healthy overweight or obese (OWO) vs lean (LN) participants.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Using a randomized crossover design, 13 OWO and 12 LN overnight fasted participants were studied for 6 h on three separate days after consuming 300 ml water containing 75 g glucose (GLU) as control or with 24 g inulin (IN) or 28 g resistant starch (RS). A standard lunch was served 4 h after the test drink.
Within the entire group, compared with control, IN significantly increased serum SCFA (P<0.001) but had no effect on free-fatty acids (FFA) or second-meal glucose and insulin responses. In contrast, RS had no significant effect on SCFA but reduced FFA rebound (P<0.001) and second-meal glucose (P=0.002) and insulin responses (P=0.024). OWO had similar postprandial serum SCFA and glucose concentrations but significantly greater insulin and FFA than LN. However, the effects of IN and RS on SCFA, glucose, insulin and FFA responses were similar in LN and OWO.
RS has favorable second-meal effects, likely related to changes in FFA rather than SCFA concentrations. However, a longer study may be needed to demonstrate an effect of RS on SCFA. We found no evidence that acute increases in SCFA after IN reduce glycemic responses in humans, and we were unable to detect a significant difference in SCFA responses between OWO vs LN subjects.
背景/目的:膳食纤维在结肠发酵生成短链脂肪酸(SCFA)可能对预防肥胖和糖尿病有益,但结肠中SCFA产生过多也被认为与肥胖的发生有关。我们旨在比较两种可发酵纤维对健康超重或肥胖(OWO)与 lean(LN)参与者餐后SCFA及第二餐血糖反应的影响。
受试者/方法:采用随机交叉设计,13名OWO参与者和12名LN参与者在隔夜禁食后,于三个不同日期分别饮用含有75g葡萄糖(GLU)的300ml水作为对照,或饮用含有24g菊粉(IN)或28g抗性淀粉(RS)的水,随后进行6小时的研究。在测试饮料饮用4小时后提供标准午餐。
在整个研究组中,与对照组相比,IN显著增加血清SCFA(P<0.001),但对游离脂肪酸(FFA)以及第二餐的葡萄糖和胰岛素反应无影响。相比之下,RS对SCFA无显著影响,但可降低FFA反弹(P<0.001)以及第二餐的葡萄糖(P=0.002)和胰岛素反应(P=0.024)。OWO参与者的餐后血清SCFA和葡萄糖浓度与LN参与者相似,但胰岛素和FFA水平显著更高。然而,IN和RS对LN和OWO参与者的SCFA、葡萄糖、胰岛素和FFA反应的影响相似。
RS对第二餐有有益影响,可能与FFA而非SCFA浓度的变化有关。然而,可能需要更长时间的研究来证明RS对SCFA的影响。我们没有发现证据表明IN后SCFA的急性增加会降低人体的血糖反应,并且我们未能检测到OWO与LN受试者之间SCFA反应的显著差异。