• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性在堕胎后五年的精神健康和幸福感:一项前瞻性、纵向队列研究。

Women's Mental Health and Well-being 5 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study.

机构信息

Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 1;74(2):169-178. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3478.

DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3478
PMID:27973641
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The idea that abortion leads to adverse psychological outcomes has been the basis for legislation mandating counseling before obtaining an abortion and other policies to restrict access to abortion.

OBJECTIVE

To assess women's psychological well-being 5 years after receiving or being denied an abortion.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study presents data from the Turnaway Study, a prospective longitudinal study with a quasi-experimental design. Women were recruited from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2010, from 30 abortion facilities in 21 states throughout the United States, interviewed via telephone 1 week after seeking an abortion, and then interviewed semiannually for 5 years, totaling 11 interview waves. Interviews were completed January 31, 2016. We examined the psychological trajectories of women who received abortions just under the facility's gestational limit (near-limit group) and compared them with women who sought but were denied an abortion because they were just beyond the facility gestational limit (turnaway group, which includes the turnaway-birth and turnaway-no-birth groups). We used mixed effects linear and logistic regression analyses to assess whether psychological trajectories differed by study group.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

We included 6 measures of mental health and well-being: 2 measures of depression and 2 measures of anxiety assessed using the Brief Symptom Inventory, as well as self-esteem, and life satisfaction.

RESULTS

Of the 956 women (mean [SD] age, 24.9 [5.8] years) in the study, at 1 week after seeking an abortion, compared with the near-limit group, women denied an abortion reported more anxiety symptoms (turnaway-births, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.01 to 1.13; turnaway-no-births, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.39 to 3.18), lower self-esteem (turnaway-births, -0.33; 95% CI, -0.56 to -0.09; turnaway-no-births, -0.40; 95% CI, -0.78 to -0.02), lower life satisfaction (turnaway-births, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.38 to 0.06; turnaway-no-births, -0.41; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.06), and similar levels of depression (turnaway-births, 0.13; 95% CI, -0.46 to 0.72; turnaway-no-births, 0.44; 95% CI, -0.50 to 1.39).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, compared with having an abortion, being denied an abortion may be associated with greater risk of initially experiencing adverse psychological outcomes. Psychological well-being improved over time so that both groups of women eventually converged. These findings do not support policies that restrict women's access to abortion on the basis that abortion harms women's mental health.

摘要

重要性

堕胎会导致不良心理后果的观点一直是立法要求堕胎前进行咨询以及其他限制堕胎获取的政策的基础。

目的

评估接受或被拒绝堕胎后 5 年内妇女的心理健康状况。

设计、地点和参与者:本研究提供了来自“拒绝堕胎研究”的数据,这是一项具有准实验设计的前瞻性纵向研究。2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 12 月 31 日,从美国 21 个州的 30 个堕胎机构招募了妇女,在寻求堕胎后一周通过电话进行了访谈,然后每半年进行一次,总共进行了 11 次访谈,于 2016 年 1 月 31 日完成。我们检查了接近设施妊娠限制(近限组)下接受堕胎的妇女的心理轨迹,并将其与因超出设施妊娠限制而寻求但被拒绝堕胎的妇女(包括堕胎后生育和堕胎后未生育组)进行了比较。我们使用混合效应线性和逻辑回归分析来评估心理轨迹是否因研究组而异。

主要结局和测量

我们纳入了 6 项心理健康和幸福感指标:使用简明症状量表评估的 2 项抑郁和 2 项焦虑指标,以及自尊和生活满意度。

结果

在研究中的 956 名女性(平均[标准差]年龄 24.9[5.8]岁)中,与近限组相比,被拒绝堕胎的女性报告的焦虑症状更多(堕胎后生育组,0.57;95%置信区间,0.01 至 1.13;堕胎后未生育组,2.29;95%置信区间,1.39 至 3.18),自尊较低(堕胎后生育组,-0.33;95%置信区间,-0.56 至 -0.09;堕胎后未生育组,-0.40;95%置信区间,-0.78 至 -0.02),生活满意度较低(堕胎后生育组,-0.16;95%置信区间,-0.38 至 0.06;堕胎后未生育组,-0.41;95%置信区间,-0.77 至 -0.06),抑郁水平相似(堕胎后生育组,0.13;95%置信区间,-0.46 至 0.72;堕胎后未生育组,0.44;95%置信区间,-0.50 至 1.39)。

结论和相关性

在这项研究中,与堕胎相比,被拒绝堕胎可能与最初经历不良心理后果的风险增加有关。随着时间的推移,心理健康状况得到改善,两组妇女最终趋同。这些发现不支持以堕胎会损害妇女心理健康为由限制妇女堕胎获取的政策。

相似文献

1
Women's Mental Health and Well-being 5 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study.女性在堕胎后五年的精神健康和幸福感:一项前瞻性、纵向队列研究。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 1;74(2):169-178. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3478.
2
Five-Year Suicidal Ideation Trajectories Among Women Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion.接受或拒绝堕胎的女性五年自杀意念轨迹。
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 1;175(9):845-852. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18010091. Epub 2018 May 24.
3
Perceived stress and emotional social support among women who are denied or receive abortions in the United States: a prospective cohort study.在美国被拒绝或接受堕胎的女性中感知到的压力和情绪社会支持:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Jun 19;14:76. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-76.
4
Does abortion reduce self-esteem and life satisfaction?堕胎会降低自尊和生活满意度吗?
Qual Life Res. 2014 Nov;23(9):2505-13. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0687-7. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
5
Effects of Carrying an Unwanted Pregnancy to Term on Women's Existing Children.妊娠对女性现有子女的影响。
J Pediatr. 2019 Feb;205:183-189.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
6
Perceived abortion stigma and psychological well-being over five years after receiving or being denied an abortion.接受或拒绝堕胎五年后对堕胎耻辱感和心理健康的认知。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0226417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226417. eCollection 2020.
7
Receiving versus being denied an abortion and subsequent tobacco use.接受堕胎与被拒绝堕胎及随后的烟草使用情况。
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Mar;19(3):438-46. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1515-y.
8
Receiving versus being denied an abortion and subsequent drug use.接受或拒绝堕胎以及随后的药物使用。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jan 1;134:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
9
Effect of abortion vs. carrying to term on a woman's relationship with the man involved in the pregnancy.堕胎与足月产对女性与妊娠相关男性关系的影响。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015 Mar;47(1):11-8. doi: 10.1363/47e2315. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
10
A comparison of depression and anxiety symptom trajectories between women who had an abortion and women denied one.曾接受人工流产的女性与被拒绝人工流产的女性之间抑郁和焦虑症状轨迹的比较。
Psychol Med. 2015 Jul;45(10):2073-82. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714003213. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between abortion restrictiveness and suicidality among birthing people in the United States 2010 to 2020.2010年至2020年美国分娩人群中堕胎限制与自杀倾向之间的关联
Front Reprod Health. 2025 Aug 29;7:1553493. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1553493. eCollection 2025.
2
'Better she gets infected by other diseases but not pregnancy'. Narratives from adolescent girls and community males following pregnancy escalation during COVID-19 lockdown.“她感染其他疾病也比怀孕好”。新冠疫情封锁期间怀孕情况升级后,青春期女孩和社区男性的叙述。
Front Reprod Health. 2025 Aug 21;7:1643865. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1643865. eCollection 2025.
3
Prenatal Psychosocial Distress Screening for Individuals Experiencing Pregnancies Complicated by Fetal Anomalies.
对患有胎儿异常合并妊娠的个体进行产前心理社会应激筛查。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 18;15(7):322. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070322.
4
Using Natural Language Processing to Describe the Use of an Online Community for Abortion During 2022: Dynamic Topic Modeling Analysis of Reddit Posts.利用自然语言处理描述2022年一个堕胎在线社区的使用情况:Reddit帖子的动态主题建模分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jul 9;5:e72771. doi: 10.2196/72771.
5
Psychological care and mental health outcomes in women receiving termination of pregnancy in Rwanda: A cross-sectional study.卢旺达接受终止妊娠的女性的心理护理与心理健康结果:一项横断面研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251348990. doi: 10.1177/17455057251348990. Epub 2025 Jun 29.
6
Association Between State Abortion Restrictiveness and Perinatal Depression.州堕胎限制与围产期抑郁症之间的关联。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2025 Jun;34(6):835-842. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0533.
7
Epidemiological trends in abortion and miscarriage between 1990 and 2019.1990年至2019年间堕胎与流产的流行病学趋势。
Reprod Health. 2025 Jun 5;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02049-3.
8
MCH and Abortion: Towards a Stronger Relationship.孕产妇和儿童健康与堕胎:建立更紧密的关系。
Matern Child Health J. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04109-3.
9
Advancing knowledge and public health: a scientific exploration of abortion safety.推进知识与公共卫生:堕胎安全性的科学探索
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08053-z.
10
The harms of imposing barriers to abortion care on people's psychological well-being.对堕胎护理设置障碍对人们心理健康的危害。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;24(2):221-222. doi: 10.1002/wps.21310.