University of Cambridge, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, CB2 3ER, Cambridge,United Kingdom.
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology,Department of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, 04103,Leipzig,Germany.
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 15;6:39122. doi: 10.1038/srep39122.
A long tradition of cultural evolutionary studies has developed a rich repertoire of mathematical models of social learning. Early studies have laid the foundation of more recent endeavours to infer patterns of cultural transmission from observed frequencies of a variety of cultural data, from decorative motifs on potsherds to baby names and musical preferences. While this wide range of applications provides an opportunity for the development of generalisable analytical workflows, archaeological data present new questions and challenges that require further methodological and theoretical discussion. Here we examine the decorative motifs of Neolithic pottery from an archaeological assemblage in Western Germany, and argue that the widely used (and relatively undiscussed) assumption that observed frequencies are the result of a system in equilibrium conditions is unwarranted, and can lead to incorrect conclusions. We analyse our data with a simulation-based inferential framework that can overcome some of the intrinsic limitations in archaeological data, as well as handle both equilibrium conditions and instances where the mode of cultural transmission is time-variant. Results suggest that none of the models examined can produce the observed pattern under equilibrium conditions, and suggest. instead temporal shifts in the patterns of cultural transmission.
文化进化研究有着悠久的传统,发展出了丰富的数学模型来研究社会学习。早期的研究为后来从各种文化数据(从陶器上的装饰图案到婴儿名字和音乐偏好)的观察频率推断文化传播模式奠定了基础。虽然这种广泛的应用为可推广的分析工作流程的发展提供了机会,但考古数据提出了新的问题和挑战,需要进一步的方法和理论讨论。在这里,我们研究了来自德国西部考古组合的新石器时代陶器的装饰图案,并认为广泛使用(且相对未讨论)的假设,即观察到的频率是在平衡条件下的系统的结果是没有根据的,并且可能导致错误的结论。我们使用基于模拟的推理框架来分析我们的数据,该框架可以克服考古数据中的一些内在限制,同时处理平衡条件以及文化传播模式随时间变化的情况。结果表明,在平衡条件下,没有一个模型可以产生观察到的模式,而是表明文化传播模式存在时间上的转变。