• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算新石器时代在斯堪的纳维亚传播过程中,人群迁徙和文化传播的相对重要性。

Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia.

机构信息

Complex Systems Laboratory, University of Girona, C/. Maria Aurèlia Capmany 61, 17003 Girona, Spain

Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), C/. Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J R Soc Interface. 2018 Nov 21;15(148):20180597. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0597.

DOI:10.1098/rsif.2018.0597
PMID:30464058
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6283996/
Abstract

Using a database of early farming sites in Scandinavia, we estimate that the spread rate of the Neolithic was in the range 0.44-0.66 km yr This is substantially slower (by about 50%) than the rate in continental Europe. We interpret this result in the framework of a new mathematical model that includes horizontal cultural transmission (acculturation), vertical cultural transmission (interbreeding) and demic diffusion (reproduction and dispersal of farmers). To parametrize the model, we estimate reproduction rates of early farmers using archaeological data (sum-calibrated probabilities for the dates of early Neolithic Scandinavian sites) and use them in a wave-of-advance model for the first time. Comparing the model with the archaeological data, we find that the percentage of the spread rate due to cultural diffusion is below 50% (except for very extreme parameter values, and even for them it is below 54%). This strongly suggests that the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia was driven mainly by demic diffusion. This conclusion, obtained from archaeological data, agrees qualitatively with the implications of ancient genetic data, but the latter are yet too few in Scandinavia to produce any quantitative percentage for the spread rate due to cultural diffusion. We also find that, on average, fewer than eight hunter-gatherers were incorporated in the Neolithic communities by each group of 10 pioneering farmers, via horizontal and/or vertical cultural transmission.

摘要

利用斯堪的纳维亚早期农业遗址数据库,我们估计新石器时代的传播速度在 0.44-0.66 公里/年之间。这比欧洲大陆的速度慢了约 50%。我们在一个新的数学模型框架内解释这一结果,该模型包括水平文化传播(文化适应)、垂直文化传播(杂交)和人口扩散(农民的繁殖和扩散)。为了参数化该模型,我们使用考古数据(新石器时代斯堪的纳维亚遗址日期的总和校准概率)来估计早期农民的繁殖率,并首次将其用于前进波模型。将模型与考古数据进行比较,我们发现文化扩散对传播速度的贡献百分比低于 50%(除非参数值非常极端,即使在这种情况下,它也低于 54%)。这强烈表明,新石器时代在斯堪的纳维亚的传播主要是由人口扩散驱动的。这个从考古数据中得出的结论,在定性上与古代遗传数据的含义一致,但由于斯堪的纳维亚的遗传数据太少,无法对文化扩散导致的传播速度产生任何定量百分比。我们还发现,平均而言,每 10 名开拓性农民中,只有不到 8 名狩猎采集者通过水平和/或垂直文化传播融入新石器时代社区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/c1995ab012fe/rsif20180597-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/53e36399992a/rsif20180597-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/e20d8cd5281b/rsif20180597-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/fc7933fca6c9/rsif20180597-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/745166afc105/rsif20180597-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/73e86598522b/rsif20180597-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/1be1966e3e8f/rsif20180597-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/c1995ab012fe/rsif20180597-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/53e36399992a/rsif20180597-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/e20d8cd5281b/rsif20180597-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/fc7933fca6c9/rsif20180597-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/745166afc105/rsif20180597-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/73e86598522b/rsif20180597-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/1be1966e3e8f/rsif20180597-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6283996/c1995ab012fe/rsif20180597-g7.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia.估算新石器时代在斯堪的纳维亚传播过程中,人群迁徙和文化传播的相对重要性。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Nov 21;15(148):20180597. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0597.
2
Demic and cultural diffusion propagated the Neolithic transition across different regions of Europe.人口和文化传播推动了新石器时代的转变在欧洲不同地区的传播。
J R Soc Interface. 2015 May 6;12(106). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0166.
3
The ancient cline of haplogroup K implies that the Neolithic transition in Europe was mainly demic.单倍群 K 的古老分布范围表明,欧洲的新石器时代转型主要是人群迁徙的结果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 11;7(1):11229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11629-8.
4
Archaeological expansions in tropical South America during the late Holocene: Assessing the role of demic diffusion.全新世晚期南美洲热带地区的考古扩张:评估人群扩散的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 27;15(4):e0232367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232367. eCollection 2020.
5
Synthesis between demic and cultural diffusion in the Neolithic transition in Europe.欧洲新石器时代转型中的半分化与文化扩散的综合。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 13;109(46):18669-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200662109. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
6
Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa.评估文化扩散在班图人向东南非扩散中的重要性。
PLoS One. 2019 May 8;14(5):e0215573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215573. eCollection 2019.
7
Cultural diffusion was the main driving mechanism of the Neolithic transition in southern Africa.文化传播是非洲南部新石器时代过渡的主要驱动机制。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 17;9(12):e113672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113672. eCollection 2014.
8
A comparison of Y-chromosome variation in Sardinia and Anatolia is more consistent with cultural rather than demic diffusion of agriculture.与农业的人口扩散相比,在撒丁岛和安纳托利亚的 Y 染色体变异的比较更符合文化扩散。
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 29;5(4):e10419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010419.
9
The genomic ancestry of the Scandinavian Battle Axe Culture people and their relation to the broader Corded Ware horizon.斯堪的纳维亚战斧文化人的基因组起源及其与更广泛的绳纹器文化圈的关系。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Oct 9;286(1912):20191528. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1528.
10
Spreading Waves in a Farmers and Hunter-Gatherers Model of the Neolithic Transition in Europe.欧洲新石器时代过渡的农民和狩猎采集者模型中的传播波。
Bull Math Biol. 2018 Sep;80(9):2452-2480. doi: 10.1007/s11538-018-0475-6. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling the European Neolithic expansion suggests predominant within-group mating and limited cultural transmission.对欧洲新石器时代扩张的建模表明,群体内交配占主导,文化传播有限。
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 25;16(1):7905. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63172-0.
2
Environmental effects on the spread of the Neolithic crop package to South Asia.环境对新石器时代作物传播到南亚的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 11;17(7):e0268482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268482. eCollection 2022.
3
Reassessing the role of climate change in the Tupi expansion (South America, 5000-500 BP).

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating genetic kin relationships in prehistoric populations.估算史前人群中的遗传亲属关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0195491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195491. eCollection 2018.
2
The Beaker phenomenon and the genomic transformation of northwest Europe.大杯型陶器文化现象与西北欧的基因组变革。
Nature. 2018 Mar 8;555(7695):190-196. doi: 10.1038/nature25738. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
The genomic history of southeastern Europe.东南欧的基因组历史。
重新评估气候变化在图皮人扩张(南美洲,公元前 5000 年至公元前 500 年)中的作用。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Oct;18(183):20210499. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0499. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
4
Archaeological expansions in tropical South America during the late Holocene: Assessing the role of demic diffusion.全新世晚期南美洲热带地区的考古扩张:评估人群扩散的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 27;15(4):e0232367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232367. eCollection 2020.
5
Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa.评估文化扩散在班图人向东南非扩散中的重要性。
PLoS One. 2019 May 8;14(5):e0215573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215573. eCollection 2019.
Nature. 2018 Mar 8;555(7695):197-203. doi: 10.1038/nature25778. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
The genetic prehistory of the Baltic Sea region.波罗的海地区的遗传史前史。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jan 30;9(1):442. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-02825-9.
5
Mitochondrial variability in the Mediterranean area: a complex stage for human migrations.地中海地区的线粒体变异性:人类迁徙的复杂阶段。
Ann Hum Biol. 2018 Feb;45(1):5-19. doi: 10.1080/03014460.2017.1416172.
6
Climate induced human demographic and cultural change in northern Europe during the mid-Holocene.全新世中期北欧气候引起的人口和文化变化。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 10;7(1):15251. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14353-5.
7
The ancient cline of haplogroup K implies that the Neolithic transition in Europe was mainly demic.单倍群 K 的古老分布范围表明,欧洲的新石器时代转型主要是人群迁徙的结果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 11;7(1):11229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11629-8.
8
Reconciling evidence from ancient and contemporary genomes: a major source for the European Neolithic within Mediterranean Europe.协调古代和当代基因组的证据:地中海欧洲地区欧洲新石器时代的一个主要来源。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Mar 29;284(1851). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1976.
9
Genomic insights into the origin of farming in the ancient Near East.对古代近东地区农业起源的基因组学洞察。
Nature. 2016 Aug 25;536(7617):419-24. doi: 10.1038/nature19310. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
10
Genome-wide patterns of selection in 230 ancient Eurasians.230名古代欧亚人的全基因组选择模式
Nature. 2015 Dec 24;528(7583):499-503. doi: 10.1038/nature16152. Epub 2015 Nov 23.