Rosen Rachel, Mitchell Paul D, Amirault Janine, Amin Manali, Watters Karen, Rahbar Reza
Aerodigestive Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Clinical Research Center, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA.
J Pediatr. 2017 Apr;183:127-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.11.035. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
To determine if the reflux finding score (RFS), a validated score for airway inflammation, correlates with gastroesophageal reflux measured by multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) testing, endoscopy, and quality of life scores.
We performed a prospective, cross-sectional cohort study of 77 children with chronic cough undergoing direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and MII testing with pH (pH-MII) between 2006 and 2011. Airway examinations were videotaped and reviewed by 3 blinded otolaryngologists each of whom assigned RFS to the airways. RFS were compared with the results of reflux testing (endoscopy, MII, symptom scores). An intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated for the degree of agreement between otolaryngologists' RFS. Receiver operating characteristic curves were created to determine the sensitivity of the RFS. Spearman correlation was calculated between the RFS and reflux measurements by pH-MII.
The mean ± SD RFS was 12 ± 4. There was no correlation between pH-MII variables and mean RFS (|r| < 0.15). The concordance correlation coefficient for RFS between otolaryngologists was low (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.32). Using pH-metry as a gold standard, the positive predictive value for the RFS was 29%. Using MII as the gold standard, the positive predictive value for the RFS was 40%. There was no difference in the mean RFS in patients with (12 ± 4) and without (12 ± 3) esophagitis (P = .9). There was no correlation between RFS and quality of life scores (|r| < 0.15, P > .3).
The RFS cannot predict pathologic gastroesophageal reflux and an airway examination should not be used as a basis for prescribing gastroesophageal reflux therapies.
确定反流发现评分(RFS)这一已验证的气道炎症评分,是否与通过多通道腔内阻抗(MII)测试、内镜检查及生活质量评分所测得的胃食管反流相关。
我们对2006年至2011年间77例接受直接喉镜和支气管镜检查、食管胃十二指肠镜检查以及pH值联合MII(pH-MII)测试的慢性咳嗽儿童进行了一项前瞻性横断面队列研究。气道检查进行了录像,由3名不知情的耳鼻喉科医生进行审查,他们每人对气道进行RFS评分。将RFS与反流测试结果(内镜检查、MII、症状评分)进行比较。计算耳鼻喉科医生RFS之间的组内相关系数以评估一致性程度。绘制受试者工作特征曲线以确定RFS的敏感性。计算RFS与pH-MII反流测量值之间的Spearman相关性。
RFS的平均值±标准差为12±4。pH-MII变量与平均RFS之间无相关性(|r|<0.15)。耳鼻喉科医生之间RFS的一致性相关系数较低(组内相关系数=0.32)。以pH测量法作为金标准,RFS的阳性预测值为29%。以MII作为金标准,RFS的阳性预测值为40%。有食管炎(12±4)和无食管炎(12±3)患者的平均RFS无差异(P = 0.9)。RFS与生活质量评分之间无相关性(|r|<0.15,P>.3)。
RFS无法预测病理性胃食管反流,气道检查不应作为开具胃食管反流治疗药物的依据。