• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What we know about designing an effective improvement intervention (but too often fail to put into practice).我们所了解的关于设计有效改进干预措施的内容（但往往未能付诸实践）。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jul;26(7):578-582. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006143. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
2
The design of the SAFE or SORRY? study: a cluster randomised trial on the development and testing of an evidence based inpatient safety program for the prevention of adverse events.“安全还是遗憾？”研究的设计：一项关于基于证据的住院患者安全计划预防不良事件的开发与测试的整群随机试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr 1;9:58. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-58.
3
Safety Express: a strategic health authority's approach.安全快报：战略卫生当局的方法。
Br J Nurs. 2012;21(11):677-83. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.11.677.
4
Nursing home safety: current issues and barriers to improvement.养老院安全：当前问题与改进障碍
Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:369-82. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090912.
5
Evaluation of Nursing Facility Resident Safety During Implementation of the INTERACT Quality Improvement Program.评估护理院居民在实施 INTERACT 质量改进计划期间的安全。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):907-913.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
6
Give falls the slip. A comprehensive fall-prevention program will minimize resident injuries and save money, too.防止跌倒。一个全面的预防跌倒计划将使住院患者的受伤情况减至最少，同时也能节省费用。
Contemp Longterm Care. 1993 Nov;16(11):72-3.
7
Changes in nursing practice to improve patient safety.护理实践中的变革以提高患者安全。
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2017 Apr 27;37(spe):e68271. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2016.esp.68271.
8
The SAFE or SORRY? programme. part II: effect on preventive care.SAFE 或 SORRY? 方案。第二部分：对预防保健的影响。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Sep;48(9):1049-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.02.018. Epub 2011 Mar 26.
9
First outcome indicators allow national comparison.首要结果指标便于进行全国范围的比较。
Nurs Times. 2010;106(13):1.
10
Implementing the Falls Clinical Practice Guidelines in long-term care: an exemplary model.在长期护理中实施跌倒临床实践指南：一个典范模式。
Director. 2004 Spring;12(2):76-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric providers' views on participating in an HPV Vaccine Quality Improvement Intervention: a qualitative analysis.儿科医护人员对参与人乳头瘤病毒疫苗质量改进干预措施的看法：一项定性分析
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05169-0.
2
Understanding organisational and nursing behaviour changes associated with a therapeutic engagement improvement tool in acute mental health inpatient settings: A qualitative analysis.了解急性精神科住院环境中与治疗参与度改善工具相关的组织和护理行为变化：一项定性分析。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Jan 23;6:100180. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100180. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Looking Back, Looking Forward: A Study Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Multiple-Case Study to Examine Improvement Sustainability of Large-Scale Initiatives in Tertiary Hospitals.回顾与展望：一项混合方法多案例研究的研究方案，以检验三级医院大规模举措的改进可持续性
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;11(15):2175. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152175.
4
Developing Implementation Strategies to Support the Uptake of a Risk Tool to Aid Physicians in the Clinical Management of Patients With Syncope: Systematic Theoretical and User-Centered Design Approach.制定实施策略以支持采用风险工具，协助医生对晕厥患者进行临床管理：系统的理论和以用户为中心的设计方法
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jun 13;10:e44089. doi: 10.2196/44089.
5
A realist evaluation of a multifactorial falls prevention programme in care homes.养老机构多因素跌倒预防计划的实际评估。
Age Ageing. 2022 Dec 5;51(12). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac263.
6
General practitioners' role in improving health care in care homes: a realist review.全科医生在改善养老院医疗保健中的作用：一个实际主义综述。
Fam Pract. 2023 Feb 9;40(1):119-127. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac071.
7
A multidomain decision support tool to prevent falls in older people: the FinCH cluster RCT.多领域决策支持工具预防老年人跌倒：FinCH 群组 RCT 研究
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jan;26(9):1-136. doi: 10.3310/CWIB0236.
8
The uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes: a realist review.养老机构中居住和临终的老年人最小数据集（MDS）的采用和使用：一个实际主义综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02705-w.
9
How gender shapes interprofessional teamwork in the operating room: a qualitative secondary analysis.性别如何塑造手术室中的跨专业团队合作：一项定性二次分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 19;21(1):1357. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07403-2.
10
Exploring managers' response to a quality and safety leadership intervention: findings from a multiple case study in Norwegian nursing homes and homecare services.探索管理者对质量和安全领导力干预的反应：挪威疗养院和家庭护理服务中多案例研究的结果。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Aug;10(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001494.

本文引用的文献

1
The problem with Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.计划-执行-研究-行动循环的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):147-52. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005076. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
2
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0（卓越质量改进报告标准）：通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
3
Demystifying theory and its use in improvement.揭开理论及其在改进中的应用的神秘面纱。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Mar;24(3):228-38. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
4
Moving improvement research closer to practice: the Researcher-in-Residence model.让改进研究更贴近实践：驻院研究员模式。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct;23(10):801-5. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002779. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
5
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.更好的干预措施报告：干预描述和复制（TIDieR）清单和指南模板。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
6
Recommendations for evaluation of health care improvement initiatives.医疗保健改进举措评估建议。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.007.
7
Bridging the ivory towers and the swampy lowlands; increasing the impact of health services research on quality improvement.弥合象牙塔与低地沼泽之间的差距；提高卫生服务研究对质量改进的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Feb;26(1):1-5. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt076. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
8
Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's programme evaluations and relevant literature.改善医疗保健质量的十大挑战：来自健康基金会项目评估和相关文献的经验教训。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Oct;21(10):876-84. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000760. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
9
Exploring knowledge exchange: a useful framework for practice and policy.探索知识交流：实践和政策的有用框架。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Feb;74(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.021. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
10
Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program.解释密歇根模式：制定一项质量改进计划的事后理论。
Milbank Q. 2011 Jun;89(2):167-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00625.x.

What we know about designing an effective improvement intervention (but too often fail to put into practice).

作者信息

Marshall Martin, de Silva Debra, Cruickshank Lesley, Shand Jenny, Wei Li, Anderson James

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.

Evidence Centre, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jul;26(7):578-582. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006143. Epub 2016 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006143
PMID:27986901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5502247/
Abstract
摘要