Langer Thorsten, Jazmati Danny, Jung Ole, Schulz Christian, Schnell Martin W
University Children's Hospital Freiburg, Division of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Freiburg, Germany; Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Institute for Professionalism and Ethical Practice, Boston, USA.
Witten/Herdecke University, Institute for Ethics and Communication in Healthcare, Witten, Germany.
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Nov 15;33(5):Doc74. doi: 10.3205/zma001073. eCollection 2016.
Contemporary healthcare requires physicians to have well developed ethical judgment skills in addition to excellent clinical skills. However, no consensus has been reached on how to best teach ethical judgment skills during medical training. Previous studies revealed inconclusive results and applied varying theoretical frameworks. To date, the students' perspectives on their development in ethical judgment has received less attention. Better insights in the learners' experiences can help to improve educational interventions in medical ethics. A vignette featuring a challenging case with opposing views between a patient's parents and a physician followed by a questionnaire was presented to a cohort of medical students at a German medical school at three points in time during their medical training (Year 1, 2 and 5). The questionnaire included closed and open-ended questions addressing the participant's preferred, hypothetical actions, their reasoning as well as the resources informing their reasoning. Content analysis was used for qualitative data; frequencies and percentages were used to describe quantitative findings. The response rate remained stable (28%) over the study period. Participants' responses changed overtime. Accepting parents' autonomy in the decision-making process was the majority standpoint of students in year 1 and 2 and became less often cited in year 5 (Year 1/2/5: 68/67/48%). On the contrary, not readily following the parents' decision for medical reasons was a minority standpoint in year 1 and became more prevalent over time (year 1/2/5: 12/17/42%). Judgments were only partly based on ethics training. Instead, participants drew on experiences from their clinical clerkships and their personal lives. Throughout the study, participants did not feel well-prepared to make a judgment in the case (Average 2.7 on a Likert-Scale; 1=very well prepared, 4=very poor). Over the course of their medical training, the participants seemed to increasingly frame the presented vignette as a medical problem. To optimize the development of ethical judgment teaching of ethics should be more integrated in clinical teaching. In addition to the analysis of rare and extreme cases, teaching ethics should also expand on challenges students and junior doctors commonly encounter themselves to promote ethical sensitivity and confidence in students.
当代医疗保健要求医生除具备出色的临床技能外,还需具备良好的伦理判断能力。然而,对于在医学培训期间如何最好地教授伦理判断技能,尚未达成共识。先前的研究结果尚无定论,且应用了不同的理论框架。迄今为止,学生对自身伦理判断发展的看法较少受到关注。深入了解学习者的经历有助于改进医学伦理学的教育干预措施。在德国一所医学院,在医学培训的三个时间点(第1年、第2年和第5年),向一群医学生展示了一个以患者父母和医生之间存在对立观点的具有挑战性案例的 vignette,随后进行问卷调查。问卷包括封闭式和开放式问题,涉及参与者偏好的、假设的行动、他们的推理以及为其推理提供信息的资源。定性数据采用内容分析法;频率和百分比用于描述定量研究结果。在整个研究期间,回复率保持稳定(28%)。参与者的回答随时间而变化。在第1年和第2年,学生的多数立场是在决策过程中接受父母的自主权,而在第5年提及的频率降低(第1年/第2年/第5年:68%/67%/48%)。相反,因医学原因不轻易遵循父母的决定在第1年是少数立场,且随着时间推移变得更为普遍(第1年/第2年/第5年:12%/17%/42%)。判断仅部分基于伦理培训。相反,参与者借鉴了临床实习和个人生活中的经验。在整个研究过程中,参与者感觉自己没有做好对该案例进行判断的准备(李克特量表平均分为2.7;1 = 准备非常充分,4 = 准备非常差)。在医学培训过程中,参与者似乎越来越将所展示的vignette视为一个医学问题。为优化伦理判断的发展,伦理学教学应更多地融入临床教学。除了分析罕见和极端案例外,伦理学教学还应拓展学生和初级医生自身常见的挑战,以提高学生的伦理敏感度和信心。