Suppr超能文献

医学伦理与医学史教学在医学课程中有多重要?一项针对学生观点的实证研究。

How important is medical ethics and history of medicine teaching in the medical curriculum? An empirical approach towards students' views.

作者信息

Schulz Stefan, Woestmann Barbara, Huenges Bert, Schweikardt Christoph, Schäfer Thorsten

机构信息

Ruhr-University Bochum, Institute of Medical Ethics and the History of Medicine, Department of General Medicine, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2012;29(1):Doc08. doi: 10.3205/zma000778. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

It was investigated how students judge the teaching of medical ethics and the history of medicine at the start and during their studies, and the influence which subject-specific teaching of the history, theory and ethics of medicine (GTE)--or the lack thereof--has on the judgement of these subjects.

METHODS

From a total of 533 students who were in their first and 5th semester of the Bochum Model curriculum (GTE teaching from the first semester onwards) or followed the traditional curriculum (GTE teaching in the 5th/6th semester), questionnaires were requested in the winter semester 2005/06 and in the summer semester 2006. They were asked both before and after the 1st and 5th (model curriculum) or 6th semester (traditional curriculum). We asked students to judge the importance of teaching medical ethics and the history of medicine, the significance of these subjects for physicians and about teachability and testability (Likert scale from -2 (do not agree at all) to +2 (agree completely)).

RESULTS

331 questionnaire pairs were included in the study. There were no significant differences between the students of the two curricula at the start of the 1st semester. The views on medical ethics and the history of medicine, in contrast, were significantly different at the start of undergraduate studies: The importance of medical ethics for the individual and the physician was considered very high but their teachability and testability were rated considerably worse. For the history of medicine, the results were exactly opposite. GTE teaching led to a more positive assessment of items previously ranked less favourably in both curricula. A lack of teaching led to a drop in the assessment of both subjects which had previously been rated well.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with the literature, our results support the hypothesis that the teaching of GTE has a positive impact on the views towards the history and ethics of medicine, with a lack of teaching having a negative impact. Therefore the teaching of GTE should already begin in the 1st semester. The teaching of GTE must take into account that even right at the start of their studies, students judge medical ethics and the history of medicine differently.

摘要

目的

研究学生在医学伦理教学和医学史教学开始时以及学习过程中的评判情况,以及医学史、理论和伦理(GTE)的学科特定教学(或缺乏该教学)对这些学科评判的影响。

方法

在2005/06冬季学期和2006夏季学期,从波鸿模式课程第一学期和第五学期(从第一学期起进行GTE教学)或遵循传统课程(在第五/第六学期进行GTE教学)的总共533名学生中收集问卷。在第一学期和第五学期(模式课程)或第六学期(传统课程)之前和之后对他们进行询问。我们要求学生评判医学伦理教学和医学史教学的重要性、这些学科对医生的意义以及可教授性和可测试性(李克特量表从-2(完全不同意)到+2(完全同意))。

结果

331对问卷被纳入研究。两个课程的学生在第一学期开始时没有显著差异。相比之下,在本科学习开始时,对医学伦理和医学史的看法存在显著差异:医学伦理对个人和医生的重要性被认为非常高,但它们的可教授性和可测试性被评为相当差。对于医学史,结果正好相反。GTE教学导致对两个课程中先前排名较低的项目有更积极的评价。缺乏教学导致对两个先前评价良好的学科的评价下降。

结论

与文献一致,我们的结果支持以下假设,即GTE教学对医学史和医学伦理的看法有积极影响,缺乏教学则有负面影响。因此,GTE教学应在第一学期就开始。GTE教学必须考虑到,即使在学习开始时,学生对医学伦理和医学史的评判也不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验