O'Halloran S M, Heaf D P
Respiratory Unit, Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital.
Thorax. 1989 Aug;44(8):620-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.44.8.620.
Asthmatic children aged over 5 years making repeated visits to the accident and emergency department of a children's hospital were compared prospectively, on the basis of a clinical questionnaire and pulmonary function tests, with a control group of outpatients with asthma to find the reasons for their repeated attendance. Recurrent attenders (n = 145) had more severe asthma than control subjects (n = 118), with greater airway obstruction at rest (FEV1 79% v 85% predicted) and bronchial lability (47% v 38%). Significantly more of the "emergency" group used pressurised aerosols and fewer dry powder inhalers to administer bronchodilators. There were no differences in prophylactic treatment. Seventy one per cent of parents in the emergency group had feared that their child would die during an attack, compared with 56% of control subjects. Eighty one per cent of children were self referred to the accident and emergency department. Most parents had found hospital to be the quickest means of obtaining treatment in an emergency. There were no differences between the two groups in parents' knowledge about asthma, home conditions, or social disadvantage. Although children who repeatedly attend hospital accident and emergency departments for treatment of acute attacks have more severe asthma than controls and show some deficiencies in treatment, the major determinant of attendance appeared to be the parents' conviction that appropriate treatment could not be obtained elsewhere.
对一家儿童医院急诊科多次就诊的5岁以上哮喘儿童,根据临床问卷和肺功能测试,与一组哮喘门诊对照组儿童进行前瞻性比较,以找出他们反复就诊的原因。反复就诊者(n = 145)的哮喘比对照组(n = 118)更严重,静息时气道阻塞更严重(FEV1预计值分别为79%和85%),支气管易激性更高(分别为47%和38%)。“急诊”组中使用压力气雾剂吸入支气管扩张剂的比例显著更高,而使用干粉吸入器的比例更低。预防性治疗方面没有差异。急诊组中71%的家长担心孩子在发作时会死亡,而对照组这一比例为56%。81%的儿童是自行前往急诊科就诊的。大多数家长认为医院是在紧急情况下获得治疗的最快途径。两组家长在哮喘知识、家庭状况或社会劣势方面没有差异。尽管因急性发作反复前往医院急诊科治疗的儿童哮喘比对照组更严重,且在治疗上存在一些不足,但就诊的主要决定因素似乎是家长坚信在其他地方无法获得适当的治疗。