• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区居住老年人的身体活动:干预措施和背景的系统评价综述。

Physical Activity in Community Dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review of Reviews of Interventions and Context.

机构信息

Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Forvie site, Robinson Way, CB2 0SR, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Dec 20;11(12):e0168614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168614. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168614
PMID:27997604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5173028/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The promotion and maintenance of higher physical activity (PA) levels in the older population is an imperative for cognitive and healthy ageing but it is unclear what approaches are best suited to achieve this for the increasing number of older people living in the community. Effective policies should be informed by robust, multi-disciplinary and multi-dimensional evidence, which not only seeks what works, but in 'what context? In addition to evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of PA for maintaining cognitive health, social contexts such as 'how do we actually get older people to partake in PA?' and 'how do we sustain that activity long-term?' also need highlighting. This review is part of a comprehensive evidence synthesis of preventive interventions in older age, with a focus on healthy behaviours to identify evidence gaps and inform policy relating to ageing well and cognitive health. An overview of systematic reviews of PA was conducted to explore three topics: (1) PA efficacy or effectiveness for primary prevention of cognitive decline in 55+; (2) Interventions efficacious or effective for increasing PA uptake and maintenance in 55+; (3) barriers and facilitators to PA in 55+.

METHODS

Multiple databases were searched for studies in English from OECD countries between 2000 and 2016. Quality of included reviews in questions (1) and (2) were assessed using AMSTAR. Review protocols were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42014015554, 42014015584, CRD42014015557) and reviews follow PRISMA guideline.

FINDINGS

Overall, 40 systematic reviews were included. Question 1 (n = 14). 8,360 participants. Evidence suggests that PA confer mild positive effects on cognition in older adults with and without previous cognitive impairment. However, there is insufficient evidence of a dose-response relationship. Evidence on the effects of PA on delay of dementia onset is inconclusive. Question 2 (n = 17). 79,650 participants. Evidence supports the effectiveness of a variety of interventions, including group delivered, centre-based and cognitive approaches on short-term uptake of PA behaviour. Question 3 (n = 9). 22,413 participants. Barriers include health status, previous PA habits and experiences, and cultural sensitivity, while facilitators include enjoyable activities and convenient scheduling.

CONCLUSION

PA can offer small benefits to brain health, but evidence on how much activity is required to produce this effect is lacking. Evidence on the effectiveness of PA for preventing dementia and cognitive decline is lacking. Behavioural (walking, exercise) and cognitive (counselling and motivational interviews) interventions are effective for short-term uptake of physical activity in older people. In order to maintain long-term participation in PA, individualised interventions modelled using behavioural theories may be required. Public health messages should be aimed at promoting acceptable levels of PA above normal daily activities in older people. Policy and strategies aimed at increasing PA in older people should be encouraged while considering barriers and facilitators to behaviour change.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b30d/5173028/a84911feef6a/pone.0168614.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b30d/5173028/a84911feef6a/pone.0168614.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b30d/5173028/a84911feef6a/pone.0168614.g001.jpg
摘要

背景

促进和维持老年人更高水平的身体活动(PA)是认知和健康老龄化的必要条件,但目前尚不清楚哪些方法最适合满足不断增加的社区居住老年人的需求。有效的政策应该以强有力的、多学科和多维度的证据为依据,不仅要寻求有效的方法,还要了解“在什么情况下有效?”除了关于 PA 对维持认知健康的功效和有效性的证据外,还需要强调社会背景,例如“我们如何让老年人真正参与 PA?”以及“我们如何长期维持这种活动?”本综述是对老年人群预防干预综合证据综合的一部分,重点关注健康行为,以确定与健康老龄化和认知健康相关的证据差距并为其提供信息。对 PA 的系统评价进行了概述,以探讨三个主题:(1)PA 在预防 55 岁以上人群认知能力下降方面的功效或有效性;(2)增加 55 岁以上人群 PA 参与度和维持率的干预措施的功效或有效性;(3)55 岁以上人群 PA 的障碍和促进因素。

方法

在 2000 年至 2016 年间,在经合组织国家的英语数据库中搜索了这三个主题的研究。使用 AMSTAR 评估了第(1)和第(2)个问题中纳入的综述的质量。综述方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42014015554、42014015584、CRD42014015557)上注册,综述遵循 PRISMA 指南。

结果

总共纳入了 40 项系统评价。问题 1(n = 14),8360 名参与者。有证据表明,PA 对有和没有先前认知障碍的老年人的认知能力有轻微的积极影响。然而,目前还没有足够的证据表明存在剂量反应关系。PA 对痴呆症发病延迟的影响证据尚无定论。问题 2(n = 17),79650 名参与者。有证据表明,各种干预措施,包括小组、中心和认知方法,对短期 PA 行为的参与度都有效果。问题 3(n = 9),22413 名参与者。障碍包括健康状况、以前的 PA 习惯和经验以及文化敏感性,而促进因素包括愉快的活动和方便的安排。

结论

PA 可以为大脑健康带来小的益处,但缺乏关于需要多少活动才能产生这种效果的证据。PA 预防痴呆和认知能力下降的证据不足。行为(散步、锻炼)和认知(咨询和动机访谈)干预措施对老年人短期 PA 参与度有效。为了保持长期参与 PA,可能需要使用行为理论对个人进行干预。公共卫生信息应旨在促进老年人进行高于日常活动水平的可接受的 PA。应鼓励制定旨在增加老年人 PA 的政策和战略,同时考虑行为改变的障碍和促进因素。

相似文献

1
Physical Activity in Community Dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review of Reviews of Interventions and Context.社区居住老年人的身体活动:干预措施和背景的系统评价综述。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 20;11(12):e0168614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168614. eCollection 2016.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
4
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: A systematic review of reviews.促进社区老年人身体活动干预措施:综述的系统评价
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0180902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180902. eCollection 2017.
7
Effectiveness of Interventions Promoting Physical Activity and Reducing Sedentary Behavior in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Umbrella Review With Application to Saudi Arabia.促进社区居住老年人身体活动和减少久坐行为的干预措施的有效性:沙特阿拉伯的伞式综述及其应用。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023 Jun;13(2):361-373. doi: 10.1007/s44197-023-00111-6. Epub 2023 May 18.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Cognitive-behavioural therapy for a variety of conditions: an overview of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis.认知行为疗法治疗多种疾病的系统评价和全景元分析概述。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Feb;25(9):1-378. doi: 10.3310/hta25090.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to and facilitators of physical activity among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review.社区居住老年人身体活动的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 25;15(8):e095260. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095260.
2
The Effectiveness of Online Exercise on Physical Activity, Motor Function, and Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在线运动对身体活动、运动功能和心理健康的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 15;27:e64856. doi: 10.2196/64856.
3
Predictors of physical activity in daily life among women of reproductive age: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving.在全球范围内扩大身体活动干预措施:采取更大规模、更明智的方法促使人们动起来。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1337-48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30728-0. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
2
Do home-based exercise interventions improve outcomes for frail older people? Findings from a systematic review.居家锻炼干预措施能否改善体弱老年人的状况?一项系统评价的结果
Rev Clin Gerontol. 2012 Feb;22(1):68-78. doi: 10.1017/S0959259811000165. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
3
The acceptability of physical activity interventions to older adults: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.
育龄女性日常生活中身体活动的预测因素:一项范围综述
Mhealth. 2025 Jun 15;11:37. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-24-70. eCollection 2025.
4
A 12-Month Digital Peer-Supported App Intervention to Promote Physical Activity Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Follow-Up Study of a Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.一项为期12个月的数字同伴支持应用程序干预措施,以促进社区居住老年人的身体活动:非随机对照试验的随访研究。
JMIR Aging. 2025 May 28;8:e66610. doi: 10.2196/66610.
5
Do publicly funded community physical activity programs for middle-aged and older adults in Ireland work?爱尔兰为中老年人群体提供的公共资助社区体育活动项目有效果吗?
Eur J Ageing. 2025 Mar 18;22(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00847-z.
6
Mechanism-Driven Strategies for Reducing Fall Risk in the Elderly: A Multidisciplinary Review of Exercise Interventions.降低老年人跌倒风险的机制驱动策略:运动干预的多学科综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;12(23):2394. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232394.
7
A social media game to increase physical activity among older adult women: protocol of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate CHALLENGE.一项旨在增加老年女性身体活动的社交媒体游戏:评估 CHALLENGE 的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):2172. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19662-9.
8
Leisure-time physical activity as a key protective factor against cognitive decline in older adults: an isotemporal substitution analysis.闲暇时间体力活动是老年人认知能力下降的关键保护因素:等时替代分析。
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Jul 29;40(6):e00046523. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN046523. eCollection 2024.
9
Move for Life an intervention for inactive adults aged 50 years and older: a cluster randomised feasibility trial.动起来生活:一项针对 50 岁及以上不活跃成年人的干预措施:一项集群随机可行性试验。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 15;12:1348110. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348110. eCollection 2024.
10
Decomposing differences in the chronic disease condition between rural and urban older adults in China: a cross-sectional analysis.中国农村和城市老年人群慢性病状况差异的分解:一项横断面分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1298657. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1298657. eCollection 2023.
身体活动干预对老年人的可接受性:一项系统评价与元综合分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jun;158:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 10.
4
Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake and Maintenance of Healthy Behaviours by People at Mid-Life: A Rapid Systematic Review.中年人群健康行为采纳与维持的障碍及促进因素:一项快速系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 27;11(1):e0145074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145074. eCollection 2016.
5
What makes an academic paper useful for health policy?什么样的学术论文对卫生政策有用?
BMC Med. 2015 Dec 17;13:301. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0544-8.
6
Physical Activity and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke in Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study.老年人身体活动与冠心病和中风风险:心血管健康研究
Circulation. 2016 Jan 12;133(2):147-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018323. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
7
The features of interventions associated with long-term effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adults aged 55-70 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与 55-70 岁成年人身体活动干预的长期效果相关的干预措施的特点:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(4):417-33. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1012177. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
8
Older people's perspectives on participation in physical activity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature.老年人参与体育活动的观点:定性文献的系统评价和主题综合。
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;49(19):1268-76. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094015. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
10
Interventions to Increase Physical Activity Among Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis.增加老年人身体活动的干预措施:一项荟萃分析。
Gerontologist. 2015 Aug;55(4):706-18. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu090. Epub 2014 Oct 7.