Suppr超能文献

爱尔兰为中老年人群体提供的公共资助社区体育活动项目有效果吗?

Do publicly funded community physical activity programs for middle-aged and older adults in Ireland work?

作者信息

García Bengoechea Enrique, Woods Catherine B

机构信息

Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

Eur J Ageing. 2025 Mar 18;22(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00847-z.

Abstract

To strengthen practice-based evidence, pragmatic, yet rigorous, evaluation of real-world programs is necessary. This study sought to add to the evidence for the effectiveness of physical activity programs for middle-aged and older adults offered by publicly funded local sports partnerships (LSPs) in Ireland. We analysed data from 468 individuals aged 50 + years, who took part in the Move for Life cluster randomised feasibility trial. Outcomes were accelerometer-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA), light intensity physical activity (LiPA), standing time, and sedentary time; self-reported compliance with physical activity guidelines, body composition, physical function, and mental well-being. LSP programs included Women on Wheels/Bike for Life, Go for Life Games, Get Ireland Walking, and Men on the Move. We used a difference-in-differences approach to estimate program effects. We found evidence of positive program effects on accelerometer-derived MVPA (Women on Wheels/Bike for Life, Get Ireland Walking), LiPA (Go for Life Games), and sedentary time (Women on Wheels/Bike for Life, Go for Life Games) (p < .05), plus evidence of positive effects on self-reported physical activity for all LSP programs (p < .05). We did not find evidence of program effects on body composition. Outcomes related to physical function were mixed. Men on the Move was the only program where mental well-being scores increased significantly relative to the control group. Despite sample size limitations, the results support the effectiveness of LSP programs over a 6-month period, notably in terms of energy expenditure outcomes, while identifying areas for improvement regarding outcomes related to body composition, physical function and, particularly, mental well-being.

摘要

为了加强基于实践的证据,对现实世界中的项目进行务实而严谨的评估是必要的。本研究旨在补充有关爱尔兰由公共资金资助的地方体育合作伙伴关系(LSPs)提供的针对中老年人的体育活动项目有效性的证据。我们分析了468名年龄在50岁及以上的参与者的数据,他们参加了“为生活而运动”整群随机可行性试验。结果指标包括基于加速度计的中度至剧烈强度身体活动(MVPA)、轻度强度身体活动(LiPA)、站立时间和久坐时间;自我报告的体育活动指南依从性、身体成分、身体功能和心理健康。LSP项目包括“轮上女性/骑行生活”、“为生活而运动游戏”、“爱尔兰健走”和“行动中的男性”。我们采用差异中的差异方法来估计项目效果。我们发现有证据表明项目对加速度计得出的MVPA(“轮上女性/骑行生活”、“爱尔兰健走”)、LiPA(“为生活而运动游戏”)和久坐时间(“轮上女性/骑行生活”、“为生活而运动游戏”)有积极影响(p < 0.05),此外还有证据表明所有LSP项目对自我报告的体育活动有积极影响(p < 0.05)。我们没有发现项目对身体成分有影响的证据。与身体功能相关的结果好坏参半。“行动中的男性”是唯一一个相对于对照组心理健康得分显著提高的项目。尽管样本量有限,但结果支持LSP项目在6个月期间的有效性,特别是在能量消耗结果方面,同时也确定了在与身体成分、身体功能,尤其是心理健康相关的结果方面需要改进的领域。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验