Jakobsen Markus D, Aust Birgit, Dyreborg Johnny, Kines Pete, Illum Maja B, Andersen Lars L
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Region Midtjylland, Koncern HR Fysisk Arbejdsmiljø, DK-8800, Viborg, Denmark.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Dec 20;17(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1339-6.
Epidemiological studies have shown that patient transfer is a risk factor for back pain, back injuries and long term sickness absence, whereas consistent use of assistive devices during patient transfer seems to be protective. While classical ergonomic interventions based on education and training in lifting and transferring techniques have not proven to be effective in preventing back pain, participatory ergonomics, that is meant to engage and motivate the involved parties while at the same time making the intervention maximally relevant, may represent a better solution. However, these findings are largely based on uncontrolled studies and thus lack to be confirmed by studies with better study designs. In this article, we present the design of a study which aims to evaluate the effect and process of a participatory organizational intervention for improved use of assistive devices.
The study was performed as a cluster randomized controlled trial. We recruited 27 departments (clusters) from five hospitals in Denmark to participate in the study. Prior to randomization, interviews, observations and questionnaire answers (baseline questionnaire) were collected to gain knowledge of barriers and potential solutions for better use of assistive devices. In April 2016, the 27 departments were randomly allocated using a random numbers table to a participatory intervention (14 clusters, 324 healthcare workers) or a control group (13 clusters, 318 healthcare workers). The participatory intervention will consist of workshops with leaders and selected healthcare workers of each department. Workshop participants will be asked to discuss the identified barriers, develop solutions for increasing the use of assistive devices and implement them in their department. Use of assistive devices (using digital counters -, primary outcome, and accelerometers and questionnaire - secondary outcome), perceived physical exertion during patient transfer, pain intensity in the lower back, occurrence of work-related back injuries during patient transfer, organizational readiness to change, knowledge on how to perform proper patient transfer, social capital and work ability (secondary outcomes) were assessed at baseline and will also be assessed at 1 year follow-up. Process evaluation will be based on qualitative and quantitative data to assess the implementation, the change process, and the impact of context aspects.
The study will evaluate the effect and process of a participatory intervention on improving the use of assistive devices for patient transfer among hospital healthcare workers. By using cluster-randomization, as well as process- and effect evaluation based on objective measures we will contribute to the evidence base of a promising intervention approach.
ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02708550 ). March, 2016.
流行病学研究表明,患者转运是背痛、背部损伤和长期病假的一个风险因素,而在患者转运过程中持续使用辅助设备似乎具有保护作用。虽然基于搬运和转运技术教育与培训的传统工效学干预措施尚未被证明能有效预防背痛,但参与式工效学旨在让相关各方参与并激发其积极性,同时使干预措施具有最大相关性,可能是一个更好的解决方案。然而,这些发现大多基于非对照研究,因此缺乏更好研究设计的研究来证实。在本文中,我们介绍一项研究的设计,该研究旨在评估一项参与式组织干预措施对改善辅助设备使用的效果和过程。
该研究作为一项整群随机对照试验进行。我们从丹麦的五家医院招募了27个科室(群组)参与研究。在随机分组之前,收集访谈、观察结果和问卷调查答案(基线问卷),以了解辅助设备更好使用的障碍和潜在解决方案。2016年4月,使用随机数字表将这27个科室随机分配到参与式干预组(14个群组,324名医护人员)或对照组(13个群组,318名医护人员)。参与式干预将包括与每个科室的领导和选定医护人员举办的研讨会。将要求研讨会参与者讨论已确定的障碍,制定增加辅助设备使用的解决方案,并在其科室实施。在基线时评估辅助设备的使用情况(使用数字计数器——主要结局,以及加速度计和问卷调查——次要结局)、患者转运过程中感知到的体力消耗、下背部疼痛强度、患者转运过程中与工作相关的背部损伤发生率、组织变革准备情况、正确进行患者转运的知识、社会资本和工作能力(次要结局),并在1年随访时再次评估。过程评估将基于定性和定量数据,以评估实施情况、变革过程以及背景因素的影响。
该研究将评估一项参与式干预措施对改善医院医护人员在患者转运中使用辅助设备的效果和过程。通过使用整群随机化以及基于客观测量的过程和效果评估,我们将为一种有前景的干预方法的证据基础做出贡献。
ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02708550)。2016年3月。