Montgomery Paul, Hennegan Julie, Dolan Catherine, Wu Maryalice, Steinfield Laurel, Scott Linda
Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
SOAS, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 21;11(12):e0166122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166122. eCollection 2016.
Poor menstrual knowledge and access to sanitary products have been proposed as barriers to menstrual health and school attendance. In response, interventions targeting these needs have seen increasing implementation in public and private sectors. However, there has been limited assessment of their effectiveness.
Assess the impact of providing reusable sanitary pads and puberty education on girls' school attendance and psychosocial wellbeing outcomes.
A cluster quasi-randomised controlled trial was conducted across 8 schools, including 1124 girls, in rural Uganda. Schools were allocated to one of four conditions: the provision of puberty education alone; reusable sanitary pads alone; puberty education and reusable sanitary pads; and a control (no intervention). The primary outcome was school attendance. Secondary outcomes reflected psychosocial wellbeing.
At follow-up, school attendance had worsened for girls across all conditions. Per-protocol analysis revealed that this decline was significantly greater for those in the control condition d = 0.52 (95%CI 0.26-0.77), with those in control schools having a 17.1% (95%CI: 8.7-25.5) greater drop in attendance than those in any intervention school. There were no differences between the intervention conditions. High rates of school drop-out and transfer meant the trial suffered from substantial participant drop-out. Intention-to-treat analyses using two different imputation strategies were consistent with the main results, with mean differences of 5.2% attendance in best-case and 24.5% in worst-case imputations. Results were robust to adjustments for clustering. There was no impact of the interventions on girls' self-reported shame or insecurity during menstruation.
Results of the trial support the hypothesised positive impact of providing sanitary pads or puberty education for girls' school attendance in a developing country context. Findings must be interpreted with caution in light of poor participant retention, intervention fidelity, and the attendance measures used.
Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR201503001044408.
月经知识匮乏和难以获取卫生用品被认为是影响月经健康和上学出勤率的障碍。对此,针对这些需求的干预措施在公共和私营部门的实施越来越多。然而,对其效果的评估却很有限。
评估提供可重复使用的卫生巾和青春期教育对女孩上学出勤率和心理社会幸福感的影响。
在乌干达农村地区的8所学校开展了一项整群准随机对照试验,涉及1124名女孩。学校被分配到以下四种情况之一:仅提供青春期教育;仅提供可重复使用的卫生巾;青春期教育和可重复使用的卫生巾;以及对照组(无干预)。主要结果是上学出勤率。次要结果反映心理社会幸福感。
在随访时,所有情况下女孩的上学出勤率都有所下降。符合方案分析显示,对照组女孩的下降幅度显著更大,d = 0.52(95%CI 0.26 - 0.77),对照学校的出勤率下降幅度比任何干预学校的女孩高17.1%(95%CI:8.7 - 25.5)。各干预组之间没有差异。高辍学率和转学率意味着该试验存在大量参与者流失。使用两种不同插补策略的意向性分析结果与主要结果一致,最佳情况下出勤率的平均差异为5.2%,最差情况下为24.5%。结果在对聚类进行调整后依然稳健。干预措施对女孩在月经期间自我报告的羞耻感或不安全感没有影响。
该试验结果支持了在发展中国家背景下为女孩提供卫生巾或青春期教育对上学出勤率有积极影响的假设。鉴于参与者保留率低、干预保真度差以及所使用的出勤率测量方法,研究结果必须谨慎解读。
泛非临床试验注册中心PACTR201503001044408。