Hone Robert W A, Rahman Eqramur, Wong Gentle, Annan Yvette, Alexander Victoria, Al-Lami Ali, Varadharajan Kiran, Parker Michael, Simo Ricard, Pitkin Lisa, Mace Alasdair, Ofo Enyinnaya, Balfour Alistair, Nixon Iain J
Faculty of Medical Science, Post Graduate Medical Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford, Essex, UK.
Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, UK.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Apr;274(4):1983-1991. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4391-9. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
Salivary bypass tubes (SBT) are increasingly used to prevent pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) following laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy. There is minimal evidence as to their efficacy and literature is limited. The aim of the study was to determine if SBT prevent PCF. The study was a multicentre retrospective case control series (level of evidence 3b). Patients who underwent laryngectomy or pharyngolaryngectomy for cancer or following cancer treatment between 2011 and 2014 were included in the study. The primary outcome was development of a PCF. Other variables recorded were age, sex, prior radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, prior tracheostomy, type of procedure, concurrent neck dissection, use of flap reconstruction, use of prophylactic antibiotics, the suture material used for the anastomosis, tumour T stage, histological margins, day one post-operative haemoglobin and whether a salivary bypass tube was used. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. A total of 199 patients were included and 24 received salivary bypass tubes. Fistula rates were 8.3% in the SBT group (2/24) and 24.6% in the control group (43/175). This was not statistically significant on univariate (p value 0.115) or multivariate analysis (p value 0.076). In addition, no other co-variables were found to be significant. No group has proven a benefit of salivary bypass tubes on multivariate analysis. The study was limited by a small case group, variations in tube duration and subjects given a tube may have been identified as high risk of fistula. Further prospective studies are warranted prior to recommendation of salivary bypass tubes following laryngectomy.
唾液分流管(SBT)越来越多地用于预防喉切除术和喉咽切除术术后的咽皮肤瘘(PCF)。关于其疗效的证据极少,相关文献也很有限。本研究的目的是确定SBT是否能预防PCF。该研究是一项多中心回顾性病例对照系列研究(证据级别为3b)。纳入了2011年至2014年间因癌症或癌症治疗后接受喉切除术或喉咽切除术的患者。主要结局是PCF的发生。记录的其他变量包括年龄、性别、既往放疗或放化疗、既往气管切开术、手术类型、同期颈部清扫、皮瓣重建的使用、预防性抗生素的使用、吻合术使用的缝合材料、肿瘤T分期、组织学切缘、术后第一天的血红蛋白以及是否使用了唾液分流管。进行了单因素和多因素分析。共纳入199例患者,其中24例使用了唾液分流管。SBT组的瘘管发生率为8.3%(2/24),对照组为24.6%(43/175)。在单因素分析(p值0.115)或多因素分析(p值0.076)中,这一差异无统计学意义。此外,未发现其他协变量具有显著性。在多因素分析中,没有一组证明唾液分流管有获益。该研究受病例组规模小的限制,管的留置时间存在差异,且接受分流管的受试者可能被确定为有较高的瘘管风险。在推荐喉切除术后使用唾液分流管之前,有必要进行进一步的前瞻性研究。