Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany.
Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;27(4):768-774. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw216.
A risk-targeted prevention strategy may efficiently utilize limited resources available for prevention of overweight and obesity. Likewise, more efficient intervention trials could be designed if selection of subjects was based on risk. The aim of the study was to develop a risk score predicting substantial weight gain among German adults.
We developed the risk score using information on 15 socio-demographic, dietary and lifestyle factors from 32 204 participants of five population-based German cohort studies. Substantial weight gain was defined as gaining ≥10% of weight between baseline and follow-up (>6 years apart). The cases were censored according to the theoretical point in time when the threshold of 10% baseline-based weight gain was crossed assuming linearity of weight gain. Beta coefficients derived from proportional hazards regression were used as weights to compute the risk score as a linear combination of the predictors. Cross-validation was used to evaluate the score's discriminatory accuracy.
The cross-validated c index (95% CI) was 0.71 (0.67-0.75). A cutoff value of ≥475 score points yielded a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 63%. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 10.4% and 97.6%, respectively.
The proposed risk score may support healthcare providers in decision making and referral and facilitate an efficient selection of subjects into intervention trials.
风险导向的预防策略可以有效地利用有限的预防超重和肥胖的资源。同样,如果根据风险选择研究对象,也可以设计出更有效的干预试验。本研究旨在制定一种预测德国成年人体重显著增加的风险评分。
我们使用了来自五个基于人群的德国队列研究的 32204 名参与者的 15 个社会人口统计学、饮食和生活方式因素的信息来开发风险评分。体重显著增加定义为在基线和随访之间体重增加≥10%(相隔>6 年)。根据体重增加线性假设,将病例按照理论上达到 10%基线体重增加阈值的时间点进行删失。比例风险回归得出的β系数被用作权重,以计算作为预测因子线性组合的风险评分。交叉验证用于评估评分的区分准确性。
交叉验证的 c 指数(95%CI)为 0.71(0.67-0.75)。≥475 分的截断值可获得 71%的敏感性和 63%的特异性。相应的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 10.4%和 97.6%。
所提出的风险评分可以帮助医疗保健提供者在决策和转诊时提供参考,并有助于有效地选择干预试验的研究对象。