Zhu Yusen, Liu Min, Yun Xiaojing, Wang Dongmei, Bai Yuhuan, Zhang Guizhi, Ji Bei, Jing Changchun
Department of Gastroenterology, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, Shandong, 252600, China.
Department of Emergency, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, Shandong, 252600, China.
Pathol Oncol Res. 2017 Jul;23(3):657-663. doi: 10.1007/s12253-016-0164-4. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
We aimed to review the therapeutic effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), chemotherapy (NCT), and radiotherapy (NRT) on patients with resectable Esophageal cancer (EsC) by comparison with surgery alone (SA). PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane were searched for eligible studies published up to March 2015. Cochrane reviews were used for quality assessment. Eight primary outcomes were analyzed. Risk ratios (RRs)/ hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using the random- or fixed- effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi-square-based Q statistic and the I test. Publication bias was examined by the Begg's funnel plot. Totally 24 articles including 4718 EsC cases were eligible for this meta-analysis. The quality of the literatures was relatively high. Significant difference was found in five-year survival rate (RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.17-1.79, P < 0.01) between patients treated with NCT and SA, while the eight enrolled primary outcomes were all statistically different between NCRT and SA, and significant difference was identified in three-year survival between NCRT and NCT (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.14-1.60, P < 0.01). No obvious publication bias was observed. NCRT and NCT provide an obvious benefit for EsC treatment over SA, and NCRT possesses a clear advantage compared with NCT.
我们旨在通过与单纯手术(SA)对比,回顾新辅助放化疗(NCRT)、化疗(NCT)和放疗(NRT)对可切除食管癌(EsC)患者的治疗效果。检索了截至2015年3月发表的符合条件的研究的PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库。使用Cochrane综述进行质量评估。分析了八个主要结局。采用随机或固定效应模型计算风险比(RRs)/风险比(HRs)及相应的95%置信区间(95% CIs)。使用基于卡方的Q统计量和I²检验评估异质性。通过Begg漏斗图检查发表偏倚。共有24篇文章(包括4718例EsC病例)符合本荟萃分析的条件。文献质量相对较高。接受NCT治疗的患者与接受SA治疗的患者在五年生存率方面存在显著差异(RR = 1.45,95% CI:1.17 - 1.79,P < 0.01),而接受NCRT治疗的患者与接受SA治疗的患者之间纳入的八个主要结局均有统计学差异,并且接受NCRT治疗的患者与接受NCT治疗的患者在三年生存率方面存在显著差异(RR = 1.35,95% CI:1.14 - 1.60,P < 0.01)。未观察到明显的发表偏倚。与SA相比,NCRT和NCT对EsC治疗具有明显益处,并且与NCT相比,NCRT具有明显优势。