• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个性化医疗的活跃临床试验

Active Clinical Trials for Personalized Medicine.

作者信息

Minsker Stanislav, Zhao Ying-Qi, Cheng Guang

出版信息

J Am Stat Assoc. 2016;111(514):875-887. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1066682. Epub 2016 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1080/01621459.2015.1066682
PMID:28018014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5179145/
Abstract

Individualized treatment rules (ITRs) tailor treatments according to individual patient characteristics. They can significantly improve patient care and are thus becoming increasingly popular. The data collected during randomized clinical trials are often used to estimate the optimal ITRs. However, these trials are generally expensive to run, and, moreover, they are not designed to efficiently estimate ITRs. In this article, we propose a cost-effective estimation method from an active learning perspective. In particular, our method recruits only the "most informative" patients (in terms of learning the optimal ITRs) from an ongoing clinical trial. Simulation studies and real-data examples show that our active clinical trial method significantly improves on competing methods. We derive risk bounds and show that they support these observed empirical advantages. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

摘要

个体化治疗规则(ITRs)根据患者的个体特征来定制治疗方案。它们可以显著改善患者护理,因此越来越受欢迎。随机临床试验期间收集的数据通常用于估计最优的个体化治疗规则。然而,这些试验通常运行成本高昂,而且它们并非设计用于高效估计个体化治疗规则。在本文中,我们从主动学习的角度提出一种具有成本效益的估计方法。具体而言,我们的方法仅从正在进行的临床试验中招募“信息最丰富”的患者(就学习最优个体化治疗规则而言)。模拟研究和实际数据示例表明,我们的主动临床试验方法显著优于其他竞争方法。我们推导了风险边界,并表明它们支持这些观察到的经验优势。本文的补充材料可在线获取。

相似文献

1
Active Clinical Trials for Personalized Medicine.个性化医疗的活跃临床试验
J Am Stat Assoc. 2016;111(514):875-887. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1066682. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
2
Multi-Armed Angle-Based Direct Learning for Estimating Optimal Individualized Treatment Rules With Various Outcomes.基于多臂角度的直接学习法用于估计具有多种结局的最优个体化治疗规则
J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(530):678-691. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1529597. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
On using electronic health records to improve optimal treatment rules in randomized trials.利用电子健康记录改善随机试验中的最佳治疗规则。
Biometrics. 2020 Dec;76(4):1075-1086. doi: 10.1111/biom.13288. Epub 2020 May 14.
4
Do machine learning methods lead to similar individualized treatment rules? A comparison study on real data.机器学习方法是否会产生类似的个体化治疗规则?基于真实数据的比较研究。
Stat Med. 2024 May 20;43(11):2043-2061. doi: 10.1002/sim.10059. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
5
High-Dimensional Precision Medicine From Patient-Derived Xenografts.源自患者移植瘤的高维精准医学
J Am Stat Assoc. 2021;116(535):1140-1154. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1828091. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
6
Multiple domain and multiple kernel outcome-weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment regimes.用于估计个体化治疗方案的多域多核结果加权学习
J Comput Graph Stat. 2022;31(4):1375-1383. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2022.2067552. Epub 2022 May 19.
7
Learning Personalized Treatment Rules from Electronic Health Records Using Topic Modeling Feature Extraction.利用主题建模特征提取从电子健康记录中学习个性化治疗规则。
Proc Int Conf Data Sci Adv Anal. 2019 Oct;2019:392-402. doi: 10.1109/dsaa.2019.00054. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
8
Improved doubly robust estimation in learning optimal individualized treatment rules.学习最优个体化治疗规则中的改进双稳健估计
J Am Stat Assoc. 2021;116(533):283-294. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1725522. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
9
On Sparse representation for Optimal Individualized Treatment Selection with Penalized Outcome Weighted Learning.基于惩罚性结果加权学习的最优个体化治疗选择的稀疏表示
Stat. 2015;4(1):59-68. doi: 10.1002/sta4.78.
10
Entropy Learning for Dynamic Treatment Regimes.动态治疗方案的熵学习
Stat Sin. 2019;29(4):1633-1655. doi: 10.5705/ss.202018.0076.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-asymptotic Properties of Individualized Treatment Rules from Sequentially Rule-Adaptive Trials.来自序贯规则自适应试验的个体化治疗规则的非渐近性质。
J Mach Learn Res. 2022;23(250).
2
A review of research on eligibility criteria for clinical trials.临床试验入选标准研究述评。
Clin Exp Med. 2023 Oct;23(6):1867-1879. doi: 10.1007/s10238-022-00975-1. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
3
Prospects and challenges for clinical decision support in the era of big data.大数据时代临床决策支持的前景与挑战
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018;2. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00002. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
4
Improving genomics-based predictions for precision medicine through active elicitation of expert knowledge.通过主动征集专家知识来提高基于基因组学的精准医疗预测。
Bioinformatics. 2018 Jul 1;34(13):i395-i403. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty257.

本文引用的文献

1
Personalized Evaluation of Biomarker Value: A Cost-Benefit Perspective.生物标志物价值的个性化评估:成本效益视角
Stat Biosci. 2016;8(1):43-65. doi: 10.1007/s12561-014-9122-4. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
2
Using pilot data to size a two-arm randomized trial to find a nearly optimal personalized treatment strategy.利用试点数据确定双臂随机试验的规模,以找到近乎最优的个性化治疗策略。
Stat Med. 2016 Apr 15;35(8):1245-56. doi: 10.1002/sim.6783. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
3
Using Data Augmentation to Facilitate Conduct of Phase I-II Clinical Trials with Delayed Outcomes.利用数据增强促进具有延迟结果的I-II期临床试验的开展。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2014;109(506):525-536. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.881740.
4
Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning.使用结果加权学习估计个体化治疗规则。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2012 Sep 1;107(449):1106-1118. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2012.695674.
5
Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials.临床试验的适应性富集设计。
Biostatistics. 2013 Sep;14(4):613-25. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxt010. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
6
Stimulant abuser groups to engage in 12-step: a multisite trial in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network.兴奋剂滥用者参与 12 步:国家药物滥用研究所临床试验网络中的多站点试验。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Jan;44(1):103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 May 31.
7
Adaptive randomization for clinical trials.临床试验的适应性随机化
J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(4):719-36. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2012.676535.
8
A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes.一种估计最优治疗方案的稳健方法。
Biometrics. 2012 Dec;68(4):1010-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01763.x. Epub 2012 May 2.
9
Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.随机临床试验数据中的亚组识别。
Stat Med. 2011 Oct 30;30(24):2867-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.4322. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
10
PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.个性化治疗规则的性能保证
Ann Stat. 2011 Apr 1;39(2):1180-1210. doi: 10.1214/10-AOS864.