Shepard Timothy G, Shavit Adam Y, Veldhuizen Maria G, Marks Lawrence E
John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, CT, USA; College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, CT, USA; Hunter College, New York, NY, USA.
Perception. 2017 Mar-Apr;46(3-4):268-282. doi: 10.1177/0301006616686099. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
Judgments of taste intensity often show contextual contrast but not assimilation, even though both effects of stimulus context appear in other sense modalities, such as hearing. Four experiments used a paradigm that shifts the stimulus context within a test session in order to seek evidence of assimilation in judgments of the taste intensity of sucrose and, for comparison, the loudness of 500-Hz tones. Experiment 1 found no assimilation in taste using three response scales, magnitude estimation, labeled magnitude, and visual analog, but did find evidence of contrast. Experiments 2 and 3 found no clear evidence of either assimilation or contrast in taste, but found consistent evidence of assimilation in loudness. Experiment 4 found no assimilation in loudness, however, when the intervals between successive stimuli increased from about 6 to 30 s in order to match the interval used with sucrose in Experiments 1 to 3. Taken together, these findings suggest that the assimilation found in intensity judgments in other sensory modalities may not appear in taste perception because of the slower rates presenting of taste stimuli.
味觉强度判断通常表现出情境对比而非同化,尽管刺激情境的这两种效应在其他感官模态(如听觉)中都有出现。四项实验采用了一种在测试过程中改变刺激情境的范式,以寻找蔗糖味觉强度判断中同化的证据,并作为比较,寻找500赫兹音调响度判断中同化的证据。实验1使用三种反应量表(数量估计、标记数量和视觉模拟)未发现味觉同化,但发现了对比的证据。实验2和3未发现味觉同化或对比的明确证据,但发现了响度同化的一致证据。然而,实验4发现,当连续刺激之间的间隔从约6秒增加到30秒,以匹配实验1至3中蔗糖使用的间隔时,响度未出现同化。综合来看,这些发现表明,由于味觉刺激呈现的速率较慢,其他感官模态强度判断中发现的同化可能不会出现在味觉感知中。