Scully Iiona D, Napper Lucy E, Hupbach Almut
Department of Psychology, Lehigh University, USA.
Department of Psychology, Lehigh University, USA.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2017 Jul;142(Pt A):99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
According to the reconsolidation hypothesis, long-term memories return to a plastic state upon their reactivation, leaving them vulnerable to interference effects and requiring re-storage processes or else these memories might be permanently lost. The present study used a meta-analytic approach to critically evaluate the evidence for reactivation-induced changes in human episodic memory. Results indicated that reactivation makes episodic memories susceptible to physiological and behavioral interference. When applied shortly after reactivation, interference manipulations altered the amount of information that could be retrieved from the original learning event. This effect was more pronounced for remote memories and memories of narrative structure. Additionally, new learning following reactivation reliably increased the number of intrusions from new information into the original memory. These findings support a dynamic view of long-term memory by showing that memories can be changed long after they were acquired.
根据再巩固假说,长期记忆在重新激活时会恢复到可塑性状态,使其容易受到干扰效应的影响,并需要重新存储过程,否则这些记忆可能会永久丢失。本研究采用元分析方法,批判性地评估重新激活引起的人类情景记忆变化的证据。结果表明,重新激活使情景记忆易受生理和行为干扰。在重新激活后不久进行干扰操作时,干扰操作会改变从原始学习事件中可以检索到的信息量。这种效应在远期记忆和叙事结构记忆中更为明显。此外,重新激活后的新学习可靠地增加了新信息侵入原始记忆的次数。这些发现通过表明记忆在获得很久之后仍可被改变,支持了长期记忆的动态观点。