• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解基于病房的精神科住院病房干预随机对照试验的结果:对工作人员和患者体验的定性分析。

Understanding Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Ward-based Intervention on Psychiatric Inpatient Wards: A Qualitative Analysis of Staff and Patient Experiences.

作者信息

Berry Katherine, Haddock Gillian, Kellett Stephen, Awenat Yvonne, Szpak Karolina, Barrowclough Christine

机构信息

University of Manchester.

University of Sheffield.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2017 Oct;73(10):1211-1225. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22434. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1002/jclp.22434
PMID:28026872
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Team formulation is advocated to improve quality of care in mental health care and evidence from a recent U.K.-based trial supports its use in inpatient settings. This study aimed to identify the effects of formulation on practice from the perspectives of staff and patient participating in the trial, including barriers and enhancers to implementing the intervention.

METHOD

We carried out semistructured interviews with 57 staff and 20 patients. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Main outcomes were: improved staff understanding of patients, better team collaboration and increased staff awareness of their own feelings. Key contextual factors were as follows: overcoming both staff and patient anxiety, unwelcome expert versus collaborative stance, competing demands, and management support.

CONCLUSION

Team formulation should be implemented to improve quality of care in inpatient settings and larger definitive trials should be carried out to assess the effect of this intervention on patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

提倡采用团队诊疗方案来提高精神卫生保健的质量,并且一项近期基于英国的试验证据支持其在住院环境中的应用。本研究旨在从参与该试验的工作人员和患者的角度确定诊疗方案对实践的影响,包括实施该干预措施的障碍和促进因素。

方法

我们对57名工作人员和20名患者进行了半结构化访谈。使用主题分析法对数据进行了分析。

结果

主要结果如下:工作人员对患者的理解有所改善,团队协作更好,工作人员对自身感受的认识有所提高。关键背景因素如下:克服工作人员和患者的焦虑、不受欢迎的专家与协作立场、相互竞争的需求以及管理层的支持。

结论

应实施团队诊疗方案以提高住院环境中的护理质量,并且应开展更大规模的确证性试验来评估该干预措施对患者结局的影响。

相似文献

1
Understanding Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Ward-based Intervention on Psychiatric Inpatient Wards: A Qualitative Analysis of Staff and Patient Experiences.了解基于病房的精神科住院病房干预随机对照试验的结果:对工作人员和患者体验的定性分析。
J Clin Psychol. 2017 Oct;73(10):1211-1225. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22434. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
2
Feasibility of a ward-based psychological intervention to improve staff and patient relationships in psychiatric rehabilitation settings.在精神康复环境中,基于病房的心理干预对改善工作人员与患者关系的可行性。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2016 Sep;55(3):236-52. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12082. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
3
The relational institution: an ethnographic study of recovery orientation and relational engagement on a psychiatric rehabilitation ward in London.关系机构:对伦敦一家精神康复病房康复取向和关系参与的民族志研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06140-0.
4
"Just be a light": Experiences of peers working on acute inpatient psychiatric units.“做一束光”:在急性住院精神病病房工作的同伴的经验。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2017 Dec;40(4):387-394. doi: 10.1037/prj0000224. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
5
Violence and threats of violence within psychiatric care--a comparison of staff and patient experience of the same incident.精神科护理中的暴力行为及暴力威胁——同一事件中医护人员与患者经历的比较
Nord J Psychiatry. 2004;58(5):363-9. doi: 10.1080/08039480410005918.
6
The experiences of people with borderline personality disorder admitted to acute psychiatric inpatient wards: a meta-synthesis.患有边缘型人格障碍的人入住急性精神病住院病房的体验:一项荟萃分析。
J Ment Health. 2019 Aug;28(4):443-457. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1340594. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
7
Enabling people, not completing tasks: patient perspectives on relationships and staff morale in mental health wards in England.赋能于人,而非完成任务:英国精神科病房中患者对医患关系及医护人员士气的看法
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Dec 2;15:307. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0690-8.
8
Increasing access to psychological therapy on acute mental health wards: staff and patient experiences of a stepped psychological intervention.增加急性精神科病房心理治疗的可及性:阶梯式心理干预的医护人员及患者体验
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06721-7.
9
The psychiatric ward environment and nursing observations at night: A qualitative study.精神科病房环境和夜间护理观察:一项定性研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Aug;27(4):342-351. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12583. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
10
From ideals to resignation - interprofessional teams perspectives on everyday life processes in psychiatric inpatient care.从理想状态到无奈放弃——跨专业团队对精神科住院护理日常生活流程的看法
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Nov;23(9-10):595-604. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12349. Epub 2016 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing access to psychological therapy on acute mental health wards: staff and patient experiences of a stepped psychological intervention.增加急性精神科病房心理治疗的可及性:阶梯式心理干预的医护人员及患者体验
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06721-7.
2
A systematic review and narrative synthesis of indirect psychological intervention in acute mental health inpatient settings.在急性心理健康住院环境中进行间接心理干预的系统评价和叙述性综合。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2023 Jan;30(1):24-37. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2780. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
3
Recruiting and retaining participants in three randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions conducted on acute psychiatric wards: top ten tips for success.
在急性精神科病房进行的三项心理干预随机对照试验中招募和留住参与者:成功的十大秘诀。
BJPsych Open. 2022 Jul 7;8(4):e125. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.527.
4
A cluster randomised controlled trial of a ward-based intervention to improve access to psychologically-informed care and psychological therapy for mental health in-patients.一项基于病房的干预措施的整群随机对照试验,旨在改善心理健康住院患者获得心理知情护理和心理治疗的机会。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 3;22(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03696-7.
5
Criminal risk and mental illness in psychiatric inpatient units: An opportunity to provide psychological services for unmet criminogenic needs.精神病住院患者中的犯罪风险和精神疾病:为未满足的犯罪风险需求提供心理服务的机会。
Psychol Serv. 2023 Aug;20(3):565-575. doi: 10.1037/ser0000612. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
6
A psychological intervention for suicide applied to non-affective psychosis: the CARMS (Cognitive AppRoaches to coMbatting Suicidality) randomised controlled trial protocol.一项针对非情感性精神病的自杀心理干预措施:CARMS(认知方法应对自杀倾向)随机对照试验方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02697-8.