Sommer C M, Pallwein-Prettner L, Vollherbst D F, Seidel R, Rieder C, Radeleff B A, Kauczor H U, Wacker F, Richter G M, Bücker A, Rodt T, Massmann A, Pereira P L
Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern Linz, Linz, Austria.
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan;86:143-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.10.024. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of stage I renal cell carcinoma has recently gained significant attention as the now available long-term and controlled data demonstrate that RFA can result in disease-free and cancer-specific survival comparable with partial and/or radical nephrectomy. In the non-controlled single center trials, however, the rates of treatment failure vary. Operator experience and ablation technique may explain some of the different outcomes. In the controlled trials, a major limitation is the lack of adequate randomization. In case reports, original series and overview articles, transarterial embolization (TAE) before percutaneous RFA was promising to increase tumor control and to reduce complications. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on TAE as add-on to percutaneous RFA for renal tumors. Specific data regarding technique, tumor and patient characteristics as well as technical, clinical and oncologic outcomes have been analyzed. Additionally, an overview of state-of-the-art embolization materials and the radiological perspective of advanced image-guided tumor ablation (TA) will be discussed. In conclusion, TAE as add-on to percutaneous RFA is feasible and very effective and safe for the treatment of T1a tumors in difficult locations and T1b tumors. Advanced radiological techniques and technologies such as microwave ablation, innovative embolization materials and software-based solutions are now available, or will be available in the near future, to reduce the limitations of bland RFA. Clinical implementation is extremely important for performing image-guided TA as a highly standardized effective procedure even in the most challenging cases of localized renal tumors.
经皮射频消融(RFA)治疗I期肾细胞癌最近受到了广泛关注,因为现有的长期对照数据表明,RFA可实现与部分和/或根治性肾切除术相当的无病生存率和癌症特异性生存率。然而,在非对照的单中心试验中,治疗失败率各不相同。术者经验和消融技术可能解释了部分不同的结果。在对照试验中,一个主要限制是缺乏充分的随机分组。在病例报告、原始系列研究和综述文章中,经皮RFA前的经动脉栓塞(TAE)有望提高肿瘤控制率并减少并发症。本研究的目的是系统回顾关于TAE作为肾肿瘤经皮RFA辅助治疗的文献。分析了有关技术、肿瘤和患者特征以及技术、临床和肿瘤学结果的具体数据。此外,还将讨论最先进的栓塞材料概述以及先进图像引导肿瘤消融(TA)的放射学观点。总之,TAE作为经皮RFA的辅助治疗对于治疗困难部位的T1a肿瘤和T1b肿瘤是可行的,且非常有效和安全。先进的放射学技术和工艺,如微波消融、创新的栓塞材料和基于软件的解决方案现已可用,或在不久的将来可用,以减少单纯RFA的局限性。即使在局部肾肿瘤最具挑战性的病例中,临床实施对于将图像引导TA作为一种高度标准化的有效程序也极为重要。