Johansson H, Siggeirsdóttir K, Harvey N C, Odén A, Gudnason V, McCloskey E, Sigurdsson G, Kanis J A
Institute for Health and Aging, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Icelandic Heart Association, Kopavogur, Iceland.
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Mar;28(3):775-780. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3868-0. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
The risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) after a first MOF is increased over the whole duration of follow-up, but the imminent risk is even higher. If the acute increment in risk in the few years following MOF is amenable to therapeutic intervention, then immediate short-term treatments may provide worthwhile clinical dividends in a very cost-effective manner.
A history of fracture is a strong risk factor for future fractures. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the predictive value of a past MOF for future MOF changed with time.
The study was based on a population-based cohort of 18,872 men and women born between 1907 and 1935. Fractures were documented over 510,265 person-years. An extension of Poisson regression was used to investigate the relationship between the first MOF and the second. All associations were adjusted for age and time since baseline.
Five thousand thirty-nine individuals sustained one or more MOFs, of whom 1919 experienced a second MOF. The risk of a second MOF after a first increased by 4% for each year of age (95% CI 1.02-1.06) and was 41% higher for women than men (95% CI 1.25-1.59). The risk of a second MOF was highest immediately after the first fracture and thereafter decreased with time though remained higher than the population risk throughout follow-up. For example, 1 year after the first MOF, the risk of a second fracture was 2.7 (2.4-3.0) fold higher than the population risk. After 10 years, this risk ratio was 1.4 (1.2-1.6). The effect was more marked with increasing age.
The risk of MOF after a first MOF is increased over the whole follow-up, but the imminent risk is even higher. If the acute increment in risk in the few years following MOF is amenable to therapeutic intervention, then immediate short-term treatments may provide worthwhile clinical dividends in a very cost-effective manner, particularly in the elderly.
首次发生严重骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)后,在整个随访期间再次发生MOF的风险都会增加,但近期风险更高。如果MOF后几年内风险的急剧增加适合进行治疗干预,那么立即进行短期治疗可能会以非常具有成本效益的方式带来有价值的临床益处。
骨折病史是未来发生骨折的一个强风险因素。本研究的目的是确定既往MOF对未来MOF的预测价值是否随时间而变化。
该研究基于一个以人群为基础的队列,队列中有18872名出生于1907年至1935年之间的男性和女性。在510265人年的时间里记录了骨折情况。使用泊松回归的扩展方法来研究首次MOF与第二次MOF之间的关系。所有关联均根据年龄和自基线以来的时间进行了调整。
5039人发生了一次或多次MOF,其中1919人经历了第二次MOF。首次MOF后发生第二次MOF的风险随年龄每增加一岁而增加4%(95%置信区间1.02 - 1.06),女性比男性高41%(95%置信区间1.25 - 1.59)。第二次MOF的风险在首次骨折后立即最高,此后随时间下降,但在整个随访期间仍高于总体风险。例如,在首次MOF后1年,第二次骨折的风险比总体风险高2.7(2.4 - 3.0)倍。10年后,该风险比为1.4(1.2 - 1.6)。年龄越大,这种效应越明显。
首次MOF后发生MOF的风险在整个随访期间都会增加,但近期风险更高。如果MOF后几年内风险的急剧增加适合进行治疗干预,那么立即进行短期治疗可能会以非常具有成本效益的方式带来有价值的临床益处,尤其是在老年人中。