Brand Ralf, Antoniewicz Franziska
1 University of Potsdam.
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016 Dec;38(6):631-638. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2016-0171. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
Sometimes our automatic evaluations do not correspond well with those we can reflect on and articulate. We present a novel approach to the assessment of automatic and reflective affective evaluations of exercising. Based on the assumptions of the associative-propositional processes in evaluation model, we measured participants' automatic evaluations of exercise and then shared this information with them, asked them to reflect on it and rate eventual discrepancy between their reflective evaluation and the assessment of their automatic evaluation. We found that mismatch between self-reported ideal exercise frequency and actual exercise frequency over the previous 14 weeks could be regressed on the discrepancy between a relatively negative automatic and a more positive reflective evaluation. This study illustrates the potential of a dual-process approach to the measurement of evaluative responses and suggests that mistrusting one's negative spontaneous reaction to exercise and asserting a very positive reflective evaluation instead leads to the adoption of inflated exercise goals.
有时我们的自动评价与那些我们能够反思并清晰表达的评价并不相符。我们提出了一种新颖的方法来评估对锻炼的自动和反思性情感评价。基于评价模型中联想 - 命题过程的假设，我们测量了参与者对锻炼的自动评价，然后将此信息分享给他们，要求他们对此进行反思，并对他们的反思评价与自动评价之间的最终差异进行评分。我们发现，自我报告的理想锻炼频率与前14周实际锻炼频率之间的不匹配可以通过相对消极的自动评价与更积极的反思评价之间的差异进行回归分析。这项研究说明了双过程方法在测量评价反应方面的潜力，并表明不信任自己对锻炼的消极自发反应，转而坚持非常积极的反思评价会导致采用过高的锻炼目标。
